RATIONALE: Emerging evidence indicates that psychosocial stress enhances the effect of traffic exposure on the development of asthma. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that psychosocial stress would also modify the effect of traffic exposure on lung function deficits. METHODS: We studied 1,399 participants in the Southern California Children's Health Study undergoing lung function testing (mean age, 11.2 yr). We used hierarchical mixed models to assess the joint effect of traffic-related air pollution and stress on lung function. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Psychosocial stress in each child's household was assessed based on parental response to the perceived stress scale (range, 0-16) at study entry. Exposures to nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide, and total oxides of nitrogen (NOx), surrogates of the traffic-related pollution mixture, were estimated at schools and residences based on a land-use regression model. Among children from high-stress households (parental perceived stress scale > 4) deficits in FEV1 of 4.5 (95% confidence interval, -6.5 to -2.4) and of 2.8% (-5.7 to 0.3) were associated with each 21.8 ppb increase in NOx at homes and schools, respectively. These pollutant effects were significantly larger in the high-stress compared with lower-stress households (interaction P value 0.007 and 0.05 for residential and school NOx, respectively). No significant NOx effects were observed in children from low-stress households. A similar pattern of association was observed for FVC. The observed associations for FEV1 and FVC remained after adjusting for sociodemographic factors and after restricting the analysis to children who do not have asthma. CONCLUSIONS: A high-stress home environment is associated with increased susceptibility to lung function effects of air pollution both at home and at school.
RATIONALE: Emerging evidence indicates that psychosocial stress enhances the effect of traffic exposure on the development of asthma. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that psychosocial stress would also modify the effect of traffic exposure on lung function deficits. METHODS: We studied 1,399 participants in the Southern California Children's Health Study undergoing lung function testing (mean age, 11.2 yr). We used hierarchical mixed models to assess the joint effect of traffic-related air pollution and stress on lung function. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Psychosocial stress in each child's household was assessed based on parental response to the perceived stress scale (range, 0-16) at study entry. Exposures to nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide, and total oxides of nitrogen (NOx), surrogates of the traffic-related pollution mixture, were estimated at schools and residences based on a land-use regression model. Among children from high-stress households (parental perceived stress scale > 4) deficits in FEV1 of 4.5 (95% confidence interval, -6.5 to -2.4) and of 2.8% (-5.7 to 0.3) were associated with each 21.8 ppb increase in NOx at homes and schools, respectively. These pollutant effects were significantly larger in the high-stress compared with lower-stress households (interaction P value 0.007 and 0.05 for residential and school NOx, respectively). No significant NOx effects were observed in children from low-stress households. A similar pattern of association was observed for FVC. The observed associations for FEV1 and FVC remained after adjusting for sociodemographic factors and after restricting the analysis to children who do not have asthma. CONCLUSIONS: A high-stress home environment is associated with increased susceptibility to lung function effects of air pollution both at home and at school.
Authors: Hanns Moshammer; Gerard Hoek; Heike Luttmann-Gibson; Manfred A Neuberger; Temenuga Antova; Ulrike Gehring; Frantiska Hruba; Sam Pattenden; Peter Rudnai; Hana Slachtova; Renata Zlotkowska; Tony Fletcher Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2006-02-16 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Jane E Clougherty; Christina A Rossi; Joy Lawrence; Mark S Long; Edgar A Diaz; Robert H Lim; Bruce McEwen; Petros Koutrakis; John J Godleski Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Rob McConnell; Kiros Berhane; Jassy Molitor; Frank Gilliland; Nino Künzli; Peter S Thorne; Duncan Thomas; W James Gauderman; Edward Avol; Fred Lurmann; Edward Rappaport; Michael Jerrett; John M Peters Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Rhonda Spencer-Hwang; Sam Soret; Mark Ghamsary; Nico Rizzo; Marti Baum; David Juma; Susanne Montgomery Journal: J Environ Health Date: 2016 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.179
Authors: Mariam S Girguis; Lianfa Li; Fred Lurmann; Jun Wu; Carrie Breton; Frank Gilliland; Daniel Stram; Rima Habre Journal: Air Qual Atmos Health Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 3.763
Authors: Sonali Bose; Yueh-Hsiu Mathilda Chiu; Hsiao-Hsien Leon Hsu; Qian Di; Maria José Rosa; Alison Lee; Itai Kloog; Ander Wilson; Joel Schwartz; Robert O Wright; Sheldon Cohen; Brent A Coull; Rosalind J Wright Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Alison G Lee; Yueh-Hsiu M Chiu; Maria J Rosa; Sheldon Cohen; Brent A Coull; Robert O Wright; Wayne J Morgan; Rosalind J Wright Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2017-06-28 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: Maria José Rosa; Allan C Just; Itai Kloog; Ivan Pantic; Lourdes Schnaas; Alison Lee; Sonali Bose; Yueh-Hsiu Mathilda Chiu; Hsiao-Hsien Leon Hsu; Brent Coull; Joel Schwartz; Sheldon Cohen; Martha María Téllez Rojo; Robert O Wright; Rosalind J Wright Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: Lianne S Kopel; Carter R Petty; Jonathan M Gaffin; William J Sheehan; Sachin N Baxi; Watcharoot Kanchongkittiphon; Chunxia Fu; Diane R Gold; Wanda Phipatanakul Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2017-04-19