Literature DB >> 21700443

Uptake, benefits of and barriers to safer crack use kit (SCUK) distribution programmes in Victoria, Canada--a qualitative exploration.

Andrew Ivsins1, Eric Roth, Nadine Nakamura, Mel Krajden, Benedikt Fischer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Crack use is prevalent amongst street drug users in Canadian cities, and associated with severe drug use, health and social problems. Whilst few targeted interventions are available for crack use, the common use and sharing of hazardous makeshift paraphernalia are a key concern, as these risks may be associated with oral injury and blood-borne virus (BBV)--e.g., hepatitis C virus (HCV)--transmission amongst users. Recently, distribution programmes of so-called 'safer crack use kits' (SCUKs) have been initiated in select Canadian cities, primarily to reduce the use of unsafe materials and paraphernalia sharing amongst crack users. This study explored uptake and benefits of, barriers to, and possible improvements to two recently implemented SCUK distribution programme in Victoria, Canada.
METHODS: N=31 regular crack smokers were recruited through community-based efforts between June and August 2010, and assessed via an interviewer-administered protocol involving quantitative and qualitative data items. Descriptive analyses were completed with the quantitative data, and thematic content analyses were conducted with the qualitative data in order to identify and extract prominent themes and issues.
RESULTS: The sample indicated high levels of socio-economic marginalization, poly-substance use, health problems, lengthy crack use histories and common crack paraphernalia sharing. Most participants exclusively utilized the SCUK programme including glass-stems in addition to other paraphernalia materials. Participants described: lesser need to share--or to commit property crimes to obtain resources for--crack to paraphernalia, increased health awareness, and increased personal and community safety as benefits experienced from SCUK use. Limitations in SCUK resources and distribution, shortcomings in materials, and police interference were cited as barriers to current SCUK program delivery.
CONCLUSIONS: SCUK distribution in Victoria appears to result in a variety of individual and community health benefits. These benefits could be solidified by addressing current programme limitations, including better resourcing, expanding geographic distributions and eliminating police interference.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21700443     DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Drug Policy        ISSN: 0955-3959


  12 in total

1.  A 38-year-old man who uses crack cocaine.

Authors:  Amy H W Sur; Lawrence C Loh
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Drug use and phylogenetic clustering of hepatitis C virus infection among people who use drugs in Vancouver, Canada: A latent class analysis approach.

Authors:  B Jacka; B C Bray; T L Applegate; B D L Marshall; V D Lima; K Hayashi; K DeBeck; J Raghwani; P R Harrigan; M Krajden; J S G Montaner; J Grebely
Journal:  J Viral Hepat       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.728

3.  Crack pipe sharing among street-involved youth in a Canadian setting.

Authors:  Tessa Cheng; Evan Wood; Paul Nguyen; Julio Montaner; Thomas Kerr; Kora DeBeck
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2014-07-25

4.  Factors associated with difficulty accessing crack cocaine pipes in a Canadian setting.

Authors:  Lianping Ti; Jane Buxton; Evan Wood; Kate Shannon; Ruth Zhang; Julio Montaner; Thomas Kerr
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2012-03-30

5.  Reducing widespread pipe sharing and risky sex among crystal methamphetamine smokers in Toronto: do safer smoking kits have a potential role to play?

Authors:  Charlotte Hunter; Carol Strike; Lorraine Barnaby; Adam Busch; Chantel Marshall; Susan Shepherd; Shaun Hopkins
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2012-02-16

6.  A cost-benefit/cost-effectiveness analysis of an unsanctioned supervised smoking facility in the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver, Canada.

Authors:  Ehsan Jozaghi
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2014-11-13

Review 7.  Is there room for resilience? A scoping review and critique of substance use literature and its utilization of the concept of resilience.

Authors:  Katherine Rudzinski; Peggy McDonough; Rosemary Gartner; Carol Strike
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2017-09-15

8.  Education and equipment for people who smoke crack cocaine in Canada: progress and limits.

Authors:  Carol Strike; Tara Marie Watson
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2017-05-12

9.  Social network support and harm reduction activities in a peer researcher-led pilot study, British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  Sulaf Elkhalifa; Ehsan Jozaghi; Samona Marsh; Erica Thomson; Delilah Gregg; Jane Buxton; Ann Jolly
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2020-08-21

10.  Patterns, determinants and barriers of health and social service utilization among young urban crack users in Brazil.

Authors:  Marcelo Santos Cruz; Tarcisio Andrade; Francisco I Bastos; Erotildes Leal; Neilane Bertoni; Lara Lipman; Chantal Burnett; Benedikt Fischer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.