Literature DB >> 21700056

The effect of improving cow productivity, fertility, and longevity on the global warming potential of dairy systems.

M J Bell1, E Wall, G Russell, G Simm, A W Stott.   

Abstract

This study compared the environmental impact of a range of dairy production systems in terms of their global warming potential (GWP, expressed as carbon dioxide equivalents, CO(2)-eq.) and associated land use, and explored the efficacy of reducing said impact. Models were developed using the unique data generated from a long-term genetic line × feeding system experiment. Holstein-Friesian cows were selected to represent the UK average for milk fat plus protein production (control line) or were selected for increased milk fat plus protein production (select line). In addition, cows received a low forage diet (50% forage) with no grazing or were on a high forage (75% forage) diet with summer grazing. A Markov chain approach was used to describe the herd structure and help estimate the GWP per year and land required per cow for the 4 alternative systems and the herd average using a partial life cycle assessment. The CO(2)-eq. emissions were expressed per kilogram of energy-corrected milk (ECM) and per hectare of land use, as well as land required per kilogram of ECM. The effects of a phenotypic and genetic standard deviation unit improvement on herd feed utilization efficiency, ECM yield, calving interval length, and incidence of involuntary culling were assessed. The low forage (nongrazing) feeding system with select cows produced the lowest CO(2)-eq. emissions of 1.1 kg/kg of ECM and land use of 0.65 m(2)/kg of ECM but the highest CO(2)-eq. emissions of 16.1t/ha of the production systems studied. Within the herd, an improvement of 1 standard deviation in feed utilization efficiency was the only trait of those studied that would significantly reduce the reliance of the farming system on bought-in synthetic fertilizer and concentrate feed, as well as reduce the average CO(2)-eq. emissions and land use of the herd (both by about 6.5%, of which about 4% would be achievable through selective breeding). Within production systems, reductions in CO(2)-eq. emissions per kilogram of ECM and CO(2)-eq. emissions per hectare were also achievable by an improvement in feed utilization. This study allowed development of models that harness the biological trait variation in the animal to improve the environmental impact of the farming system. Genetic selection for efficient feed use for milk production according to feeding system can bring about reductions in system nutrient requirements, CO(2)-eq. emissions, and land use per unit product.
Copyright © 2011 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21700056     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-4023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  9 in total

Review 1.  The Impacts of Climate Change Mitigation Strategies on Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Sara Shields; Geoffrey Orme-Evans
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  The Influence of Climate, Soil and Pasture Type on Productivity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity of Modeled Beef Cow-Calf Grazing Systems in Southern Australia.

Authors:  Matthew J Bell; Brendan R Cullen; Richard J Eckard
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Effect of production quotas on economic and environmental values of growth rate and feed efficiency in sea cage fish farming.

Authors:  M Besson; I J M de Boer; M Vandeputte; J A M van Arendonk; E Quillet; H Komen; J Aubin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A Survey of Dairy Cattle Behavior in Different Barns in Northern Italy.

Authors:  Daniela Lovarelli; Alberto Finzi; Gabriele Mattachini; Elisabetta Riva
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Effects of Ketosis in Dairy Cows on Blood Biochemical Parameters, Milk Yield and Composition, and Digestive Capacity.

Authors:  Wei Yang; Bingbing Zhang; Chuang Xu; Hongyou Zhang; Cheng Xia
Journal:  J Vet Res       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 1.744

6.  Identification of immune traits correlated with dairy cow health, reproduction and productivity.

Authors:  Georgios Banos; Eileen Wall; Michael P Coffey; Ainsley Bagnall; Sandra Gillespie; George C Russell; Tom N McNeilly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Modelling the Effect of Diet Composition on Enteric Methane Emissions across Sheep, Beef Cattle and Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Matt Bell; Richard Eckard; Peter J Moate; Tianhai Yan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Relative emissions intensity of dairy production systems: employing different functional units in life-cycle assessment.

Authors:  S A Ross; C F E Topp; R A Ennos; M G G Chagunda
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The effects of improved performance in the U.S. dairy cattle industry on environmental impacts between 2007 and 2017.

Authors:  Judith L Capper; Roger A Cady
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.