Literature DB >> 21699951

Comparison of the immunogenicity and safety of a split-virion, inactivated, trivalent influenza vaccine (Fluzone®) administered by intradermal and intramuscular route in healthy adults.

Robert W Frenck1, Robert Belshe, Rebecca C Brady, Patricia L Winokur, James D Campbell, John Treanor, Christine M Hay, Cornelia L Dekker, Emmanuel B Walter, Thomas R Cate, Kathryn M Edwards, Heather Hill, Mark Wolff, Tom Leduc, Nadia Tornieporth.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine whether reduced doses of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) administered by the intradermal (ID) route generated similar immune responses to standard TIV given intramuscularly (IM) with comparable safety profiles. Recent changes in immunization recommendations have increased the number of people for whom influenza vaccination is recommended. Thus, given this increased need and intermittent vaccine shortages, means to rapidly expand the vaccine supply are needed. Previously healthy subjects 18-64 years of age were randomly assigned to one of four TIV vaccine groups: standard 15 μg HA/strain TIV IM, either 9 μg or 6 μg HA/strain of TIV ID given using a new microinjection system (BD Soluvia™ Microinjection System), or 3 μg HA/strain of TIV ID given by Mantoux technique. All vaccines contained A/New Caledonia (H1N1), A/Wyoming (H3N2) and B/Jiangsu strains of influenza. Sera were obtained 21 days after vaccination and hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assays were performed and geometric mean titers (GMT) were compared among the groups. Participants were queried immediately following vaccination regarding injection pain and quality of the experience. Local and systemic reactions were collected for 7 days following vaccination and compared. Ten study sites enrolled 1592 subjects stratified by age; 18-49 years [N=814] and 50-64 years [N=778]. Among all subjects, for each of the three vaccine strains, the GMTs at 21 days post-vaccination for both the 9 μg and the 6 μg doses of each strain given ID were non inferior to GMTs generated after standard 15 μg doses/strain IM. However, for the 3 μg ID dose, only the A/Wyoming antigen produced a GMT that was non-inferior to the standard IM dose. Additionally, in the subgroup of subjects 50-64 years of age, the 6μg dose given ID induced GMTs that were inferior to the standard IM TIV for the A/H1N1 and B strains. No ID dose produced a GMT superior to that seen after standard IM TIV. Local erythema and swelling were significantly more common in the ID groups but the reactions were mild to moderate and short-lived. No significant safety issues related to intradermal administration were identified. Participants given TIV ID provided favorable responses to questions about their experiences with ID administration. In conclusion, for the aggregated cohorts of adults 18-64 years of age, reduced doses (6 μg and 9 μg) of TIV delivered ID using a novel microinjection system stimulated comparable HAI antibody responses to standard TIV given IM. The reduced 3 μg dose administered ID by needle and syringe, as well as the 6 μg ID for subjects aged 50-64 years of age generated poorer immune responses as compared to the 15 μg IM dose.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21699951      PMCID: PMC3150501          DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of a single dose of half strength inactivated influenza vaccine in healthy adults.

Authors:  John Treanor; Wendy Keitel; Robert Belshe; James Campbell; Gilbert Schiff; Ken Zangwill; Mark Wolff; Alexander Klimov; Roland Levandowski; Linda Lambert
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Influenza vaccine shortage hits the USA.

Authors:  Roxanne Nelson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-12-20       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Serum antibody responses after intradermal vaccination against influenza.

Authors:  Robert B Belshe; Frances K Newman; Joan Cannon; Carol Duane; John Treanor; Christian Van Hoecke; Barbara J Howe; Gary Dubin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-11-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Dose sparing with intradermal injection of influenza vaccine.

Authors:  Richard T Kenney; Sarah A Frech; Larry R Muenz; Christina P Villar; Gregory M Glenn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-11-03       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Experiences with obtaining influenza vaccination among persons in priority groups during a vaccine shortage--United States, October-November, 2004.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 17.586

6.  Evaluation of the clinical performance of a new intradermal vaccine administration technique and associated delivery system.

Authors:  Philippe E Laurent; Stephane Bonnet; Paul Alchas; Paulina Regolini; John A Mikszta; Ronald Pettis; Noel G Harvey
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Comparative immunogenicity of trivalent influenza vaccine administered by intradermal or intramuscular route in healthy adults.

Authors:  Robert B Belshe; Frances K Newman; Ken Wilkins; Irene L Graham; Elizabeth Babusis; Marian Ewell; Sharon E Frey
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Epidermal powder immunization induces both cytotoxic T-lymphocyte and antibody responses to protein antigens of influenza and hepatitis B viruses.

Authors:  D Chen; K F Weis; Q Chu; C Erickson; R Endres; C R Lively; J Osorio; L G Payne
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Half- vs full-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (2004-2005): age, dose, and sex effects on immune responses.

Authors:  Renata J M Engler; Michael R Nelson; Mary M Klote; Mark J VanRaden; Chiung-Yu Huang; Nancy J Cox; Alexander Klimov; Wendy A Keitel; Kristin L Nichol; Warner W Carr; John J Treanor
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-08

10.  Intradermal influenza vaccination of healthy adults using a new microinjection system: a 3-year randomised controlled safety and immunogenicity trial.

Authors:  Jiri Beran; Arvydas Ambrozaitis; Alvydas Laiskonis; Narseta Mickuviene; Patrick Bacart; Yvan Calozet; Etienne Demanet; Stephane Heijmans; Paul Van Belle; Françoise Weber; Camille Salamand
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Microneedle-Mediated Vaccine Delivery to the Oral Mucosa.

Authors:  Rachel L Creighton; Kim A Woodrow
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 9.933

2.  Effects of different routes of administration on the immunogenicity of the Tat protein and a Tat-derived peptide.

Authors:  Valentina Finessi; Francesco Nicoli; Eleonora Gallerani; Fabio Sforza; Mariaconcetta Sicurella; Aurelio Cafaro; Antonella Caputo; Barbara Ensoli; Riccardo Gavioli
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Cross-protection against drifted influenza viruses: options offered by adjuvanted and intradermal vaccines.

Authors:  Andrea Orsi; Filippo Ansaldi; Daniela de Florentiis; Antonella Ceravolo; Valentina Parodi; Paola Canepa; Martina Coppelli; Giancarlo Icardi; Paolo Durando
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  A reduced-dose seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine is safe and immunogenic in adult and elderly patients in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Zoltan Vajo; Ferenc Tamas; Istvan Jankovics
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-01-04

Review 5.  Fluzone® intra-dermal (Intanza®/Istivac® Intra-dermal): An updated overview.

Authors:  Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Andrea Orsi; Filippo Ansaldi; Roberto Gasparini; Giancarlo Icardi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Head-to-head comparison of an intradermal and a virosome influenza vaccine in patients over the age of 60: evaluation of immunogenicity, cross-protection, safety and tolerability.

Authors:  Filippo Ansaldi; Andrea Orsi; Daniela de Florentiis; Valentina Parodi; Emanuela Rappazzo; Martina Coppelli; Paolo Durando; Giancarlo Icardi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Intanza (®) 9 µg intradermal seasonal influenza vaccine for adults 18 to 59 years of age.

Authors:  Isabel Leroux-Roels; Françoise Weber
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Intradermal vaccination for infants and children.

Authors:  Akihiko Saitoh; Yuta Aizawa
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Mucosal adjuvants for influenza virus-like particle vaccine.

Authors:  Fu-Shi Quan; Eun-Ju Ko; Young-Man Kwon; Kyoung Hwan Joo; Richard W Compans; Sang-Moo Kang
Journal:  Viral Immunol       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 2.257

10.  Macrophage- and neutrophil-derived TNF-α instructs skin langerhans cells to prime antiviral immune responses.

Authors:  Olivier Epaulard; Lucille Adam; Candice Poux; Gerard Zurawski; Nina Salabert; Pierre Rosenbaum; Nathalie Dereuddre-Bosquet; Sandra Zurawski; Anne-Laure Flamar; Sangkon Oh; Gabrielle Romain; Catherine Chapon; Jacques Banchereau; Yves Lévy; Roger Le Grand; Frédéric Martinon
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 5.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.