Amrita X Sarkar1, Eric A Sobie. 1. Pharmacology and Systems Therapeutics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: "Repolarization reserve" is frequently invoked to explain why potentially proarrhythmic drugs cause, across a population, a range of changes to cardiac action potentials (APs). However, the mechanisms underlying this interindividual variability are not understood quantitatively. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to perform a novel analysis of mathematical models of ventricular myocytes to quantify repolarization reserve and gain insight into the factors responsible for variability in the response to proarrhythmic drugs. METHODS/ RESULTS: In several models of human or canine ventricular myocytes, variability was simulated by randomizing model parameters and running repeated simulations. With each randomly generated set of parameters, APs before and after simulated 75% block of the rapid delayed rectifier current (I(Kr)) were calculated. Multivariable regression was performed to determine how much each model parameter attenuated or exacerbated the AP prolongation caused by the I(Kr)-blocking drug. Simulations with a human ventricular myocyte model suggest that drug response is influenced most strongly by (1) the density of I(Kr), (2) the density of slow delayed rectifier current I(Ks), (3) the voltage dependence of I(Kr) inactivation, (4) the density of L-type Ca2+ current, and (5) the kinetics of I(Ks) activation. The analysis also identified mechanisms underlying nonintuitive behavior, such as ionic currents that prolong baseline APs but decrease drug-induced AP prolongation. Finally, the simulations provided quantitative insight into conditions that aggravate the drug response, such as silent ion channel mutations and heart failure. CONCLUSION: These modeling results provide the first thorough quantification of repolarization reserve and improve our understanding of interindividual variability in adverse drug reactions.
BACKGROUND: "Repolarization reserve" is frequently invoked to explain why potentially proarrhythmic drugs cause, across a population, a range of changes to cardiac action potentials (APs). However, the mechanisms underlying this interindividual variability are not understood quantitatively. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to perform a novel analysis of mathematical models of ventricular myocytes to quantify repolarization reserve and gain insight into the factors responsible for variability in the response to proarrhythmic drugs. METHODS/ RESULTS: In several models of human or canine ventricular myocytes, variability was simulated by randomizing model parameters and running repeated simulations. With each randomly generated set of parameters, APs before and after simulated 75% block of the rapid delayed rectifier current (I(Kr)) were calculated. Multivariable regression was performed to determine how much each model parameter attenuated or exacerbated the AP prolongation caused by the I(Kr)-blocking drug. Simulations with a human ventricular myocyte model suggest that drug response is influenced most strongly by (1) the density of I(Kr), (2) the density of slow delayed rectifier current I(Ks), (3) the voltage dependence of I(Kr) inactivation, (4) the density of L-type Ca2+ current, and (5) the kinetics of I(Ks) activation. The analysis also identified mechanisms underlying nonintuitive behavior, such as ionic currents that prolong baseline APs but decrease drug-induced AP prolongation. Finally, the simulations provided quantitative insight into conditions that aggravate the drug response, such as silent ion channel mutations and heart failure. CONCLUSION: These modeling results provide the first thorough quantification of repolarization reserve and improve our understanding of interindividual variability in adverse drug reactions.
Authors: Ping Yang; Hideaki Kanki; Benoit Drolet; Tao Yang; Jian Wei; Prakash C Viswanathan; Stefan H Hohnloser; Wataru Shimizu; Peter J Schwartz; Marshall Stanton; Katherine T Murray; Kris Norris; Alfred L George; Dan M Roden Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-04-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Robert R Fenichel; Marek Malik; Charles Antzelevitch; Michael Sanguinetti; Dan M Roden; Silvia G Priori; Jeremy N Ruskin; Raymond J Lipicky; Louis R Cantilena Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2004-04
Authors: Arash Sadrieh; Stefan A Mann; Rajesh N Subbiah; Luke Domanski; John A Taylor; Jamie I Vandenberg; Adam P Hill Journal: J Physiol Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Haibo Ni; Alex Fogli Iseppe; Wayne R Giles; Sanjiv M Narayan; Henggui Zhang; Andrew G Edwards; Stefano Morotti; Eleonora Grandi Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2020-08-09 Impact factor: 8.739