Literature DB >> 21699844

Left ventricular pacing with long pulse duration can avoid phrenic nerve stimulation.

Seil Oh1, Woo-Young Kim, Hee Chan Kim, Il-Young Oh, Eue-Keun Choi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the major limitations of left ventricular pacing is phrenic nerve stimulation.
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the characteristics of the strength-duration curves of the left phrenic nerve (PN) and epicardium of the left ventricle (LV).
METHODS: A total of 12 mongrel dogs were studied. Capture threshold was assessed during pacing with 180 beats/min and various pulse durations (0.25 to 2.0 ms) in an open chest model. A commercially available LV lead was inserted through a small hole created in the pericardium. The tip electrode position was maintained at the course of the left PN with gentle manual pressure under visual inspection. The LV threshold was evaluated at the epicardium just below the PN. The LV threshold was defined as the highest amplitude that showed loss of 1:1 capture. The PN threshold was defined as the highest amplitude that could not induce any diaphragmatic contraction.
RESULTS: The strength-duration curve of the PN had a higher rheobase and shorter chronaxie than that of the LV. The LV threshold was higher than that of the PN at pulse duration <1.0 ms in bipolar pacing, but significantly lower than that of the PN at a pulse duration of 2.0 ms, especially during unipolar pacing (1.3 ± 0.21 V vs. 2.0 ± 0.56 V, LV vs. PN, P =.012).
CONCLUSION: LV pacing without PN stimulation could be achieved in pacing with long pulse duration. The longer pulse duration option can be considered in the development of devices for LV pacing such as cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Copyright © 2011 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21699844     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of different pacing strategies to minimize phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Jose F Huizar; Karoly Kaszala; Jayanthi N Koneru; Leroy R Thacker; Kenneth A Ellenbogen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-04-26

2.  Crossing of strength-duration curves with His bundle pacing and impact of pacing mode on thresholds.

Authors:  Elise Bakelants; Alwin Zweerink; Haran Burri
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2020-11-28

3.  Preventing phrenic nerve stimulation by a patch insulation in an intact swine heart model.

Authors:  Jin-Long Huang; Yenn-Jiang Lin; Yi-Wen Hung; Yu-Cheng Hsieh; Chien-Ming Cheng; Kuo-Yang Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.