BACKGROUND & AIMS: One particularly important individual dynamic known to influence the experience of pain is neuroticism, of which little is known about in visceral pain research. Our aim was to study the relationship between neuroticism, psychophysiologic response, and brain processing of visceral pain. METHODS: Thirty-one healthy volunteers (15 male; age range, 22-38 years) participated in the study. The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire was used to assess neuroticism. Skin conductance level, pain ratings, and functional magnetic resonance imaging data were acquired during anticipation of pain and painful esophageal distention. The effect of neuroticism was assessed using correlation analysis. RESULTS: There was a wide spread of neuroticism scores (range, 0-22) but no influence of neuroticism on skin conductance level and pain tolerance or pain ratings. However, a positive correlation between brain activity and neuroticism during anticipation was found in regions associated with emotional and cognitive pain processing, including the parahippocampus, insula, thalamus, and anterior cingulate cortex. These regions showed a negative correlation with neuroticism during pain (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides novel data suggesting higher neuroticism is associated with engagement of brain regions responsible for emotional and cognitive appraisal during anticipation of pain but reduced activity in these regions during pain. This may reflect a maladaptive mechanism in those with higher neuroticism that promotes overarousal during anticipation and avoidance coping during pain.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: One particularly important individual dynamic known to influence the experience of pain is neuroticism, of which little is known about in visceral pain research. Our aim was to study the relationship between neuroticism, psychophysiologic response, and brain processing of visceral pain. METHODS: Thirty-one healthy volunteers (15 male; age range, 22-38 years) participated in the study. The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire was used to assess neuroticism. Skin conductance level, pain ratings, and functional magnetic resonance imaging data were acquired during anticipation of pain and painful esophageal distention. The effect of neuroticism was assessed using correlation analysis. RESULTS: There was a wide spread of neuroticism scores (range, 0-22) but no influence of neuroticism on skin conductance level and pain tolerance or pain ratings. However, a positive correlation between brain activity and neuroticism during anticipation was found in regions associated with emotional and cognitive pain processing, including the parahippocampus, insula, thalamus, and anterior cingulate cortex. These regions showed a negative correlation with neuroticism during pain (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides novel data suggesting higher neuroticism is associated with engagement of brain regions responsible for emotional and cognitive appraisal during anticipation of pain but reduced activity in these regions during pain. This may reflect a maladaptive mechanism in those with higher neuroticism that promotes overarousal during anticipation and avoidance coping during pain.
Authors: Lizbeth J Ayoub; Alexander Barnett; Aziliz Leboucher; Mitchell Golosky; Mary Pat McAndrews; David A Seminowicz; Massieh Moayedi Journal: Pain Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: James K Ruffle; Steven J Coen; Vincent Giampietro; Steven C R Williams; A Vania Apkarian; Adam D Farmer; Qasim Aziz Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-10-28 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Brian M Quigley; Christopher C Sova; Darren M Brenner; Laurie A Keefer; Michael D Sitrin; Christopher D Radziwon; Susan S Krasner; Jeffrey M Lackner Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: Alexander Otti; Harald Guendel; Peter Henningsen; Claus Zimmer; Afra M Wohlschlaeger; Michael Noll-Hussong Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 6.186
Authors: Michiko Kano; Adam D Farmer; Qasim Aziz; Vincent P Giampietro; Michael J Brammer; Steven C R Williams; Shin Fukudo; Steven J Coen Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 4.052