Literature DB >> 21698345

[Ultrasonographic clarification of adnexal findings].

H J Prömpeler1.   

Abstract

The most important diagnostic test for clarification of an adnexal mass is ultrasonographic evaluation. The prognostic value of an ultrasonographic examination is higher in combination with the patient history and clinical findings. In order to achieve high diagnostic accuracy certain requirements are mandatory. Firstly a high level of expertise, meticulousness and patience of the examiner is crucial. Secondly the use of a high-end ultrasound machine is essential. Thirdly a thorough evaluation and interpretation of sonomorphologic findings are necessary. Furthermore, these skills have to be trained continuously. This is fundamental for subjective, sonographic pattern recognition and the successful use of tumor scores resulting in a correct classification of adnexal tumors. Most adnexal tumors (approximately 75%) can be correctly (sensitivity 95% and specificity 91%) classified as benign or malignant using a set of simple rules. Tumors which cannot be classified (approximately 25%) can be differentiated by ultrasound examination by an expert examiner on the basis of subjective evaluation in about 90% of cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21698345     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-010-2121-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  19 in total

Review 1.  Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group.

Authors:  D Timmerman; L Valentin; T H Bourne; W P Collins; H Verrelst; I Vergote
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  A new sonomorphologic scoring-system (Mainz score) for the assessment of ovarian tumors using transvaginal ultrasonography. Part II: A comparison between the scoring-system and the assessment by an experienced sonographer in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  G Weber; E Merz; F Bahlmann; A M Leber
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.548

3.  Diagnostic formula for the differentiation of adnexal tumors by transvaginal sonography.

Authors:  H J Prömpeler; H Madjar; W Sauerbrei; U Lattermann; A Pfleiderer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group.

Authors:  Dirk Timmerman; Antonia C Testa; Tom Bourne; Enrico Ferrazzi; Lieveke Ameye; Maja L Konstantinovic; Ben Van Calster; William P Collins; Ignace Vergote; Sabine Van Huffel; Lil Valentin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS).

Authors:  Usha Menon; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Rachel Hallett; Andy Ryan; Matthew Burnell; Aarti Sharma; Sara Lewis; Susan Davies; Susan Philpott; Alberto Lopes; Keith Godfrey; David Oram; Jonathan Herod; Karin Williamson; Mourad W Seif; Ian Scott; Tim Mould; Robert Woolas; John Murdoch; Stephen Dobbs; Nazar N Amso; Simon Leeson; Derek Cruickshank; Alistair McGuire; Stuart Campbell; Lesley Fallowfield; Naveena Singh; Anne Dawnay; Steven J Skates; Mahesh Parmar; Ian Jacobs
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  A scoring system to differentiate malignant from benign masses in specific ultrasound-based subgroups of adnexal tumors.

Authors:  L Ameye; L Valentin; A C Testa; C Van Holsbeke; E Domali; S Van Huffel; I Vergote; T Bourne; D Timmerman
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 7.299

7.  Risk of malignancy in unilocular ovarian cystic tumors less than 10 centimeters in diameter.

Authors:  Susan C Modesitt; Edward J Pavlik; Frederick R Ueland; Paul D DePriest; R J Kryscio; J R van Nagell
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  D Timmerman; A C Testa; T Bourne; L Ameye; D Jurkovic; C Van Holsbeke; D Paladini; B Van Calster; I Vergote; S Van Huffel; L Valentin
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.299

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses.

Authors:  A Sokalska; D Timmerman; A C Testa; C Van Holsbeke; A A Lissoni; F P G Leone; D Jurkovic; L Valentin
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 7.299

10.  Which extrauterine pelvic masses are difficult to correctly classify as benign or malignant on the basis of ultrasound findings and is there a way of making a correct diagnosis?

Authors:  L Valentin; L Ameye; D Jurkovic; U Metzger; F Lécuru; S Van Huffel; D Timmerman
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.299

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.