AIM: Non-invasive measures of atherosclerosis, such as carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), may improve global cardiovascular risk prediction. The aim of this study was to determine whether common carotid IMT in addition to traditional risk factors improves risk classification in a general population of older people. METHODS AND RESULTS: A group of 3580 non-diabetic people aged 55-75 years and free of cardiovascular disease at baseline were followed for a median time of 12.2 years. Compared to models based on Framingham risk factors, we studied the ability of common cIMT measurement to better classify people into categories of low (<10%), intermediate (10-20%) and high (>20%) 10-year risk of hard coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke. In older men, addition of cIMT to Framingham risk factors did not improve prediction of hard CHD or stroke. In older women, addition of cIMT to Framingham risk factors significantly improved risk classification. cIMT improved the C-statistic of the model for hard CHD from 0.711 to 0.719 and for stroke from 0.712 to 0.721, at good calibration. Reclassification was least in the majority of women classified as low risk (4% (n = 76) for hard CHD and 3% (n = 62) for stroke) and most substantial in women at intermediate risk (43% (n = 70) for hard CHD and 28% (n = 76) for stroke). The net reclassification improvement in women was 8.2% (p = 0.03) for hard CHD and 8.0% (p = 0.06) for stroke. CONCLUSION: cIMT had some additional value beyond traditional risk factors in the cardiovascular risk stratification of older women, but not of older men.
AIM: Non-invasive measures of atherosclerosis, such as carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), may improve global cardiovascular risk prediction. The aim of this study was to determine whether common carotid IMT in addition to traditional risk factors improves risk classification in a general population of older people. METHODS AND RESULTS: A group of 3580 non-diabeticpeople aged 55-75 years and free of cardiovascular disease at baseline were followed for a median time of 12.2 years. Compared to models based on Framingham risk factors, we studied the ability of common cIMT measurement to better classify people into categories of low (<10%), intermediate (10-20%) and high (>20%) 10-year risk of hard coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke. In older men, addition of cIMT to Framingham risk factors did not improve prediction of hard CHD or stroke. In older women, addition of cIMT to Framingham risk factors significantly improved risk classification. cIMT improved the C-statistic of the model for hard CHD from 0.711 to 0.719 and for stroke from 0.712 to 0.721, at good calibration. Reclassification was least in the majority of women classified as low risk (4% (n = 76) for hard CHD and 3% (n = 62) for stroke) and most substantial in women at intermediate risk (43% (n = 70) for hard CHD and 28% (n = 76) for stroke). The net reclassification improvement in women was 8.2% (p = 0.03) for hard CHD and 8.0% (p = 0.06) for stroke. CONCLUSION:cIMT had some additional value beyond traditional risk factors in the cardiovascular risk stratification of older women, but not of older men.
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Michael J Blaha; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Sandeep R Das; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; James Floyd; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Rachel H Mackey; Kunihiro Matsushita; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Comilla Sasson; Amytis Towfighi; Connie W Tsao; Melanie B Turner; Salim S Virani; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Patrick Yerly; Pedro Marquès-Vidal; Reza Owlya; Eric Eeckhout; Lukas Kappenberger; Roger Darioli; Michèle Depairon Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2015-03-14 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Julius M Gardin; Traci M Bartz; Joseph F Polak; Daniel H O'Leary; Nathan D Wong Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Michiel L Bots; Karlijn A Groenewegen; Todd J Anderson; Annie R Britton; Jacqueline M Dekker; Gunnar Engström; Greg W Evans; Jacqueline de Graaf; Diederick E Grobbee; Bo Hedblad; Albert Hofman; Suzanne Holewijn; Ai Ikeda; Maryam Kavousi; Kazuo Kitagawa; Akihiko Kitamura; M Arfan Ikram; Eva M Lonn; Matthias W Lorenz; Ellisiv B Mathiesen; Giel Nijpels; Shuhei Okazaki; Daniel H O'Leary; Joseph F Polak; Jacqueline F Price; Christine Robertson; Christopher M Rembold; Maria Rosvall; Tatjana Rundek; Jukka T Salonen; Matthias Sitzer; Coen D A Stehouwer; Oscar H Franco; Sanne A E Peters; Hester M den Ruijter Journal: Hypertension Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 10.190