Literature DB >> 21697209

Common carotid intima-media thickness in cardiovascular risk stratification of older people: the Rotterdam Study.

Suzette E Elias-Smale1, Maryam Kavousi, Germaine C Verwoert, Michael T Koller, Ewout W Steyerberg, Francesco U S Mattace-Raso, Albert Hofman, Arnold P G Hoeks, Robert S Reneman, Jacqueline C M Witteman.   

Abstract

AIM: Non-invasive measures of atherosclerosis, such as carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), may improve global cardiovascular risk prediction. The aim of this study was to determine whether common carotid IMT in addition to traditional risk factors improves risk classification in a general population of older people. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A group of 3580 non-diabetic people aged 55-75 years and free of cardiovascular disease at baseline were followed for a median time of 12.2 years. Compared to models based on Framingham risk factors, we studied the ability of common cIMT measurement to better classify people into categories of low (<10%), intermediate (10-20%) and high (>20%) 10-year risk of hard coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke. In older men, addition of cIMT to Framingham risk factors did not improve prediction of hard CHD or stroke. In older women, addition of cIMT to Framingham risk factors significantly improved risk classification. cIMT improved the C-statistic of the model for hard CHD from 0.711 to 0.719 and for stroke from 0.712 to 0.721, at good calibration. Reclassification was least in the majority of women classified as low risk (4% (n = 76) for hard CHD and 3% (n = 62) for stroke) and most substantial in women at intermediate risk (43% (n = 70) for hard CHD and 28% (n = 76) for stroke). The net reclassification improvement in women was 8.2% (p = 0.03) for hard CHD and 8.0% (p = 0.06) for stroke.
CONCLUSION: cIMT had some additional value beyond traditional risk factors in the cardiovascular risk stratification of older women, but not of older men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21697209     DOI: 10.1177/1741826711414623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol        ISSN: 2047-4873            Impact factor:   7.804


  23 in total

Review 1.  Sex differences in cardiovascular ageing.

Authors:  Allison A Merz; Susan Cheng
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Ultrasound imaging of carotid intima-media thickness: an office-based tool to assist physicians in cardiovascular risk assessment.

Authors:  Eric Y Yang; Vijay Nambi
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Emelia J Benjamin; Michael J Blaha; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Sandeep R Das; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; James Floyd; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Rachel H Mackey; Kunihiro Matsushita; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Comilla Sasson; Amytis Towfighi; Connie W Tsao; Melanie B Turner; Salim S Virani; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  New risk markers for cardiovascular prevention.

Authors:  Guy G De Backer
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.113

5.  Relation of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness to Cardiovascular Events in Black Americans (From the Jackson Heart Study).

Authors:  Todd C Villines; Lucy L Hsu; Chad Blackshear; Cheryl R Nelson; Michael Griswold
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  The atherosclerosis burden score (ABS): a convenient ultrasound-based score of peripheral atherosclerosis for coronary artery disease prediction.

Authors:  Patrick Yerly; Pedro Marquès-Vidal; Reza Owlya; Eric Eeckhout; Lukas Kappenberger; Roger Darioli; Michèle Depairon
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 7.  The role of carotid intimal thickness testing and risk prediction in the development of coronary atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Sirous Darabian; Mehera Hormuz; Muhammad Aamir Latif; Sogol Pahlevan; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.113

8.  What do carotid intima-media thickness and plaque add to the prediction of stroke and cardiovascular disease risk in older adults? The cardiovascular health study.

Authors:  Julius M Gardin; Traci M Bartz; Joseph F Polak; Daniel H O'Leary; Nathan D Wong
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.251

9.  Common carotid intima-media thickness measurements do not improve cardiovascular risk prediction in individuals with elevated blood pressure: the USE-IMT collaboration.

Authors:  Michiel L Bots; Karlijn A Groenewegen; Todd J Anderson; Annie R Britton; Jacqueline M Dekker; Gunnar Engström; Greg W Evans; Jacqueline de Graaf; Diederick E Grobbee; Bo Hedblad; Albert Hofman; Suzanne Holewijn; Ai Ikeda; Maryam Kavousi; Kazuo Kitagawa; Akihiko Kitamura; M Arfan Ikram; Eva M Lonn; Matthias W Lorenz; Ellisiv B Mathiesen; Giel Nijpels; Shuhei Okazaki; Daniel H O'Leary; Joseph F Polak; Jacqueline F Price; Christine Robertson; Christopher M Rembold; Maria Rosvall; Tatjana Rundek; Jukka T Salonen; Matthias Sitzer; Coen D A Stehouwer; Oscar H Franco; Sanne A E Peters; Hester M den Ruijter
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Ultrasound in cardiovascular risk prediction: don't forget the plaque!

Authors:  Vijay Nambi; Gerd Brunner; Christie M Ballantyne
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.