Literature DB >> 21697166

Experimental evidence that women's mate preferences are directly influenced by cues of pathogen prevalence and resource scarcity.

Anthony J Lee1, Brendan P Zietsch.   

Abstract

When choosing a mate, women are thought to face a trade-off between genetic and parental quality. Recent research suggests that this trade-off is influenced by environmental factors such as pathogen prevalence and resource scarcity, which affect the relative value of genetic and parental quality to offspring fitness. To further investigate these findings, the current study primed 60 women with pathogen prevalence, resource scarcity or an irrelevant threat, before administering a forced trade-off task that assessed mate preferences for traits thought to be indicative of genetic or parental quality. Women primed with pathogen prevalence revealed greater preferences for traits indicative of genetic quality at the expense of traits indicative of parental quality. The reverse was found for women primed with resource scarcity. These findings suggest that environmental factors may directly influence women's mate preferences owing to evolved plasticity, such that mate preferences are flexible in response to environmental factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21697166      PMCID: PMC3210674          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  11 in total

1.  National income inequality predicts women's preferences for masculinized faces better than health does.

Authors:  Robert Brooks; Isabel M Scott; Alexei A Maklakov; Michael M Kasumovic; Andrew P Clark; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Mate selection-a selection for a handicap.

Authors:  A Zahavi
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Romantic involvement often reduces men's testosterone levels--but not always: the moderating role of extrapair sexual interest.

Authors:  Matthew McIntyre; Steven W Gangestad; Peter B Gray; Judith Flynn Chapman; Terence C Burnham; Mary T O'Rourke; Randy Thornhill
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2006-10

4.  The evolution of human mating: trade-offs and strategic pluralism.

Authors:  S W Gangestad; J A Simpson
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.579

5.  The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for masculinized male faces.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones; John R Crawford; Lisa L M Welling; Anthony C Little
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Women's fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence.

Authors:  Martie G Haselton; Geoffrey F Miller
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2006-03

7.  Multiple partners are associated with higher testosterone in North American men and women.

Authors:  Sari M van Anders; Lisa Dawn Hamilton; Neil V Watson
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2007-01-27       Impact factor: 3.587

8.  Testosterone increases perceived dominance but not attractiveness in human males.

Authors:  John P Swaddle; Gillian W Reierson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs.

Authors:  Norman P Li; J Michael Bailey; Douglas T Kenrick; Joan A W Linsenmeier
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-06

Review 10.  Good genes, complementary genes and human mate preferences.

Authors:  S Craig Roberts; Anthony C Little
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 1.082

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  An Evolutionary Perspective on Appearance Enhancement Behavior.

Authors:  Adam C Davis; Steven Arnocky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-10-06

2.  Mate value and self-esteem: evidence from eight cultural groups.

Authors:  Robin Goodwin; Tara Marshall; Marta Fülöp; Joseph Adonu; Slawomir Spiewak; Felix Neto; Sonia Hernandez Plaza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Competition-related factors directly influence preferences for facial cues of dominance in allies.

Authors:  Christopher D Watkins; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 4.  Evolved but Not Fixed: A Life History Account of Gender Roles and Gender Inequality.

Authors:  Nan Zhu; Lei Chang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-07-23

Review 5.  Infection threat shapes our social instincts.

Authors:  Peter Kramer; Paola Bressan
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.944

6.  The association of cultural and contextual factors with social contact avoidance during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Wolfgang Messner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Environmental influences on mate preferences as assessed by a scenario manipulation experiment.

Authors:  Daniele Marzoli; Francesco Moretto; Aura Monti; Ornella Tocci; S Craig Roberts; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The influence of the digital divide on face preferences in El Salvador: people without internet access prefer more feminine men, more masculine women, and women with higher adiposity.

Authors:  Carlota Batres; David I Perrett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.