Literature DB >> 21696933

The optimal dose of esmolol and nicardipine for maintaining cardiovascular stability during rapid-sequence induction.

Young-Eun Moon1, Sang-Hoon Lee, Jaemin Lee.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal dose of esmolol in combination with nicardipine in effectively blocking undesirable cardiovascular responses during rapid-sequence induction.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical comparison study.
SETTING: Operating room of a university hospital. PATIENTS: 200 ASA physical status 1 and 2 patients requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal tube placement.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated into one of 4 groups: Group E0 (no esmolol; control), Group E0.25 (esmolol 0.25 mg/kg), Group E0.5 (esmolol 0.5 mg/kg), and Group E1.0 (esmolol 1.0 mg/kg). All patients received 20 μg/kg of nicardipine, and esmolol was then given according to group allocation. Ninety seconds later, thiopental sodium 5 mg/kg and succinylcholine 1.0 mg/kg were injected. Endotracheal intubation was performed 60 seconds after injection of the anesthetic agents. MEASUREMENTS: Systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and mean arterial (MAP) pressures; heart rate (HR), and rate-pressure product (RPP) were measured 30 seconds before and after intubation, and at 1, 3, 5, and 10 minutes after intubation. Rate changes using baseline values as the standard [rate changes = measured value/baseline value × 100 (%)] were calculated. MAIN
RESULTS: Significant attenuations in SBP, MAP, HR, and RPP after intubation were noted in the experimental groups as compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Rate changes in HR in Groups E0.5 and E1.0 were significantly lower than those in Group E0.25 immediately and one minute after intubation (P < 0.05). No difference in rate changes in HR were noted between the E0.5 and E1.0 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of nicardipine 20 μg/kg and esmolol 0.5 mg/kg most effectively attenuates the cardiovascular responses during rapid-sequence induction.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21696933     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  4 in total

1.  Esmolol infusion versus propranolol infusion: effects on heart rate and blood pressure in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Matthew D Muller; Tariq Ali Ahmad; Alvaro F Vargas Pelaez; David N Proctor; Anthony S Bonavia; J Carter Luck; Stephan R Maman; Amanda J Ross; Urs A Leuenberger; Patrick M McQuillan
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2016-12-29

2.  Comparative evaluation of esmolol and dexmedetomidine for attenuation of sympathomimetic response to laryngoscopy and intubation in neurosurgical patients.

Authors:  Vinit Kumar Srivastava; Sanjay Agrawal; Sujeet Kumar Singh Gautam; Mukadder Ahmed; Sunil Sharma; Raj Kumar
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

3.  Comparison of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine for Suppression of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Study.

Authors:  Sandeep Sharma; Om Prakash Suthar; M L Tak; Abhilasha Thanvi; Naveen Paliwal; Rakesh Karnawat
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

4.  Effect of Different Concentrations of Esmolol on Perioperative Hemodynamics and Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Colectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Fuxi Song; Yanwu Jin; Peng Li; Chao Zheng; Xin Zhao
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.162

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.