Literature DB >> 21695794

Advanced maturation by electrical stimulation: Differences in response between C2C12 and primary muscle progenitor cells.

Marloes L P Langelaan1, Kristel J M Boonen, Kang Yuen Rosaria-Chak, Daisy W J van der Schaft, Mark J Post, Frank P T Baaijens.   

Abstract

Skeletal muscle tissue engineering still does not result in the desired functional properties and texture as preferred for regenerative medicine and meat production applications. Electrical stimulation has been appropriately used as a tool to advance muscle cell maturation in vitro, thereby simulating nerve stimulation, as part of the muscle cell niche in vivo. We first investigated the effects of electrical stimulation protocols in two-dimensional (2D) monolayers of C2C12 and translated these protocols to a three-dimensional (3D) model system, based on a collagen type I/Matrigel(™) hydrogel. More importantly, we addressed the ongoing debate of the translation of results found in cell lines (C2C12) to a primary cell source [muscle progenitor cells (MPCs)] in our 3D system. Striking differences in maturation level were found between the different cell sources. Constructs with MPCs were much more mature than C2C12 constructs, based on developed cross-striations and expression levels of mature myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoforms. Overall, electrical stimulation, when optimally timed, accelerated sarcomere assembly in both 2D and 3D. In addition, MPC constructs were more susceptible to the electrical stimulus, resulting in a shift of MHC expression to slower isoforms.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21695794     DOI: 10.1002/term.345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med        ISSN: 1932-6254            Impact factor:   3.963


  51 in total

Review 1.  In vitro myoblast motility models: investigating migration dynamics for the study of skeletal muscle repair.

Authors:  K P Goetsch; K H Myburgh; Carola U Niesler
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Determination and validation of reference gene stability for qPCR analysis in polysaccharide hydrogel-based 3D chondrocytes and mesenchymal stem cell cultural models.

Authors:  Wai Hon Chooi; Ruijie Zhou; Suan Siong Yeo; Feng Zhang; Dong-An Wang
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  Engineering skeletal muscle tissues from murine myoblast progenitor cells and application of electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Daisy W J van der Schaft; Ariane C C van Spreeuwel; Kristel J M Boonen; Marloes L P Langelaan; Carlijn V C Bouten; Frank P T Baaijens
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 4.  Microfluidic devices for disease modeling in muscle tissue.

Authors:  Mollie M Smoak; Hannah A Pearce; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Extracellular stimulation with human "noisy" electromyographic patterns facilitates myotube activity.

Authors:  M Sciancalepore; T Coslovich; P Lorenzon; G Ziraldo; G Taccola
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  A multiplexed chip-based assay system for investigating the functional development of human skeletal myotubes in vitro.

Authors:  A S T Smith; C J Long; K Pirozzi; S Najjar; C McAleer; H H Vandenburgh; J J Hickman
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 7.  Biomimetic 3D Tissue Models for Advanced High-Throughput Drug Screening.

Authors:  Ki-Hwan Nam; Alec S T Smith; Saifullah Lone; Sunghoon Kwon; Deok-Ho Kim
Journal:  J Lab Autom       Date:  2014-11-10

8.  Microphysiological Systems: Design, Fabrication, and Applications.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Kun Man; Jiafeng Liu; Yang Liu; Qi Chen; Yong Zhou; Yong Yang
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2020-05-10

Review 9.  Engineering skeletal muscle repair.

Authors:  Mark Juhas; Nenad Bursac
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 10.  Synergizing Engineering and Biology to Treat and Model Skeletal Muscle Injury and Disease.

Authors:  Nenad Bursac; Mark Juhas; Thomas A Rando
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 9.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.