Literature DB >> 21695775

An improved flow cytometric assay for detection and discrimination between malignant cells and atypical mesothelial cells, in serous cavity effusions.

Nektaria A Kentrou1, Nikolaos J Tsagarakis, Konstantina Tzanetou, Maria Damala, Konstantinos A Papadimitriou, Dimitra Skoumi, Aimilia Stratigaki, Nikolaos I Anagnostopoulos, Eleni Malamou-Lada, Pauline Athanassiadou, George Paterakis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate a flow cytometric assay for the detection of malignant effusions.
METHODS: During the last 4-year period, 125 effusions suspicious for malignancy were prospectively analyzed by flow cytometry and conventional cytology. A three-step flow cytometric assay was performed, beginning with an initial informative panel of two protocols, containing SYTO-16, 7-AAD, CD71-PE, CD45-ECD, and CD66abce-FITC, CD64-PE, CD45-ECD, CD16-PECy5, CD14-PECy7, respectively. This was followed by a basic immunophenotypic panel of seven three-color combinations, containing in the first position, EMA, Ber-EP4, CD66abce, CD56, and intracellular desmin-33, combined with CD71-PE and CD45-PeCy5 in each tube. Finally, a cytokeratin-FITC/propidium iodide DNA panel was conducted, for the detection of aneuploidy in cytokeratin positive cells.
RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of flow cytometry were 85.1 and 97.8%, and of cytology 93.2 and 95.6%, respectively. A significant association was observed between the results of the two techniques (P < 0.001). Among eight atypical cases detected by cytology, five had been precisely characterized as malignant by flow cytometry. EMA and Ber-EP4 proved the most sensitive markers for malignancy diagnosis, while the detection of desmin-33 negative/cytokeratin positive cells had the simultaneous highest positive and negative predictive values. CD66abce was very specific, although nonsensitive, while DNA ploidy analysis was nonspecific, as hyperploidy was observed in reactive mesothelial cells.
CONCLUSIONS: A flow cytometric assay of high sensitivity and specificity is proposed for the routine identification of carcinoma cells in effusions and their distinction from atypical mesothelial cells, as an ancillary to conventional cytology.
Copyright © 2011 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21695775     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.20608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom        ISSN: 1552-4949            Impact factor:   3.058


  4 in total

1.  An integrated, multiparametric flow cytometry chip using "microfluidic drifting" based three-dimensional hydrodynamic focusing.

Authors:  Xiaole Mao; Ahmad Ahsan Nawaz; Sz-Chin Steven Lin; Michael Ian Lapsley; Yanhui Zhao; J Philip McCoy; Wafik S El-Deiry; Tony Jun Huang
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Diagnostic and prognostic significance of flow cytometry immunophenotyping in patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  D Subirá; M Simó; J Illán; C Serrano; S Castañón; R Gonzalo; J J Granizo; M Martínez-García; M Navarro; J Pardo; J Bruna
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  Usefulness of Flow Cytometric Analysis for Detecting Leptomeningeal Diseases in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Sang Yong Shin; Seung Tae Lee; Hee Jin Kim; Young Lyun Oh; Seok Jin Kim; Won Seog Kim; Sun Hee Kim
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Free-Floating Mesothelial Cells in Pleural Fluid After Lung Surgery.

Authors:  Arne Kienzle; Andrew B Servais; Alexandra B Ysasi; Barry C Gibney; Cristian D Valenzuela; Willi L Wagner; Maximilian Ackermann; Steven J Mentzer
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-04-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.