Literature DB >> 21695436

Tendon lesions in the shoulder: tear and wear without push and pull?

P P F M Kuijer, M J M Hoozemans, M H W Frings-Dresen.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21695436      PMCID: PMC3299974          DOI: 10.1007/s00420-011-0669-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


× No keyword cloud information.
First of all, we would like to complement Siedler and his colleagues for their innovative case–control study in patients with clinically established tendon lesions of the m. supraspinatus in order to verify a pathological dose–response relation for work-related risk factors of shoulder complaints, taking into account personal and sport-related confounders (Seidler et al. 2011). We were surprised to read that lifting and carrying was considered as a potential risk factor or confounder and not pushing and pulling. As far as we know, there is no epidemiological evidence for an association between lifting and carrying and shoulder symptoms. However, several studies reported significant associations between pushing and pulling and shoulder symptoms (Van der Beek et al. 1993; Hughes et al. 1997; Hoozemans et al. 2002a, b; Harkeness et al. 2003; Smedley et al. 2003). Not taking into account pushing and pulling as a potential risk factor or confounder may partly explain the observed differences in odds ratio’s (ORs) between exposure in terms of occupational groups (Table 2; Seidler et al. 2011) and in terms of strenuous activities (Table 3; Seidler et al. 2011). For instance, for construction workers, packers and physically exposed service workers (f.i. nurses and refuse collectors), Seidler et al. (2011) observed significant adjusted ORs of 2.5, 5.0 and 1.9, respectively. These ORs are somewhat higher than for lifting and carrying, which may be caused by the fact that jobs that consist of manual materials handling often include pushing and pulling besides lifting and carrying (Baril-Gingras and Lortie 1995). For comparable jobs, Hoozemans et al. (2002a) reported significant prevalence rate ratios (PRRs) for shoulder symptoms between 2.2 and 4.9 for self-reported and observed exposure to pushing and pulling in their 1-year prospective cohort study among 829 workers. In this study, the PRRs were adjusted for working above shoulder level and lifting and carrying. These findings are supported by biomechanical studies on contact forces at the glenohumeral joint in jobs like service workers in distribution (Hoozemans et al. 2004) and refuse collectors (Kuijer et al. 2003). Therefore, we strongly recommend taking into account pushing and pulling when evaluating manual materials handling, especially in relation to shoulder symptoms (Kuijer et al. 2007).
  9 in total

1.  Mechanical loading of the low back and shoulders during pushing and pulling activities.

Authors:  Marco J M Hoozemans; P Paul F M Kuijer; Idsart Kingma; Jaap H van Dieën; Wiebe H K de Vries; Luc H V van der Woude; Dirk Jan H E J Veeger; Allard J van der Beek; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Effect of a redesigned two-wheeled container for refuse collecting on mechanical loading of low back and shoulders.

Authors:  P Paul F M Kuijer; Marco J M Hoozemans; Idsart Kingma; Jaap H Van Dieën; Wiebe H K De Vries; Dirk Jan Veeger; Allard J Van der Beek; Bart Visser; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Pushing and pulling in association with low back and shoulder complaints.

Authors:  M J M Hoozemans; A J van der Beek; M H W Frings-Dresen; L H V van der Woude; F J H van Dijk
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders in an aluminum smelter.

Authors:  R E Hughes; B A Silverstein; B A Evanoff
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  The handling of objects other than boxes: univariate analysis of handling techniques in a large transport company.

Authors:  Genevieve Baril-Gingras; Monique Lortie
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Work-related lesions of the supraspinatus tendon: a case-control study.

Authors:  Andreas Seidler; Ulrich Bolm-Audorff; Gabriela Petereit-Haack; Elke Ball; Magdalena Klupp; Noëlle Krauss; Gine Elsner
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Low-back and shoulder complaints among workers with pushing and pulling tasks.

Authors:  Marco J M Hoozemans; Allard J van der Beek; Monique H W Fring-Dresen; Luc H V van der Woude; Frank J H van Dijk
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.024

8.  Risk factors for incident neck and shoulder pain in hospital nurses.

Authors:  J Smedley; H Inskip; F Trevelyan; P Buckle; C Cooper; D Coggon
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Mechanical and psychosocial factors predict new onset shoulder pain: a prospective cohort study of newly employed workers.

Authors:  E F Harkness; G J Macfarlane; E S Nahit; A J Silman; J McBeth
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.402

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.