| Literature DB >> 21695118 |
George A Wolff1, David S M Billett, Brian J Bett, Jens Holtvoeth, Tania FitzGeorge-Balfour, Elizabeth H Fisher, Ian Cross, Roger Shannon, Ian Salter, Ben Boorman, Nicola J King, Alan Jamieson, Frédéric Chaillan.
Abstract
The addition of iron to high-nutrient low-chlorophyll (HNLC) oceanic waters stimulates phytoplankton, leading to greater primary production. Large-scale artificial ocean iron fertilization (OIF) has been proposed as a means of mitigating anthropogenic atmospheric CO(2), but its impacts on ocean ecosystems below the photic zone are unknown. Natural OIF, through the addition of iron leached from volcanic islands, has been shown to enhance primary productivity and carbon export and so can be used to study the effects of OIF on life in the ocean. We compared two closely-located deep-sea sites (∼400 km apart and both at ∼4200 m water depth) to the East (naturally iron fertilized; +Fe) and South (HNLC) of the Crozet Islands in the southern Indian Ocean. Our results suggest that long-term geo-engineering of surface oceanic waters via artificial OIF would lead to significant changes in deep-sea ecosystems. We found that the +Fe area had greater supplies of organic matter inputs to the seafloor, including polyunsaturated fatty acid and carotenoid nutrients. The +Fe site also had greater densities and biomasses of large deep-sea animals with lower levels of evenness in community structuring. The species composition was also very different, with the +Fe site showing similarities to eutrophic sites in other ocean basins. Moreover, major differences occurred in the taxa at the +Fe and HNLC sites revealing the crucial role that surface oceanic conditions play in changing and structuring deep-sea benthic communities.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21695118 PMCID: PMC3114783 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020697
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Location maps of the +Fe and HNLC sites with respect to:
a. monthly (October 1998) SeaWiFS chlorophyll (mg m−3) distribution, showing a typical spring bloom to the north of the Crozet Plateau (adapted from Ref. 15), with the meander of the Sub-Antarctic Front indicated by parallel black lines. b. Water depth (km) in the corresponding Crozet region (derived from the General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans, Centenary Edition).
Details of selected scientific deployments at +Fe and HNLC sites around the Crozet Plateau.
| Site | Discovery Station Number | Latitude (S) | Longitude(E) | Date | Depth (m) | Gear | Sampling type |
| +Fe | 15773#6 | 45°50.43′ | 56°06.16′ | 12/12/2005 | 4157 | ROBIO | Bottom video/stills |
| +Fe | 15773#8 | 45°43.06′ | 56°32.16′ | 12/12/2005 | 4258–4290 | Trawl | Invertebrate megabenthos |
| +Fe | 13773#9 | 45° 50.45′ | 56°24.78′ | 13/12/2005 | 4200 | WASP | Bottom video/stills |
| +Fe | 15773#13 | 45°50.47′ | 56°06.42′ | 14/12/2005 | 4162 | ROBIO | Bottom stills |
| +Fe | 15773#17 | 45°43.47′ | 56°36.66′ | 15/12/2005 | 4301–4283 | Trawl | Invertebrate megabenthos |
| +Fe | 15773#20 | 45°53.34′ | 56°24.24′ | 15/12/2005 | 4189 | Megacorer | Surface sediments |
| +Fe | 15773#21 | 45°53.67′ | 56°24.40′ | 15/12/2005 | 4193 | Megacorer | Surface sediments |
| +Fe | 15773#23 | 45°40.05′ | 56°35.27′ | 16/12/2005 | 4269–4275 | Trawl | Invertebrate megabenthos |
| +Fe | 15773#25 | 45°55.07′ | 56°27.95′ | 17/12/2005 | 4203 | Megacorer | Surface sediments |
| +Fe | 15773#26 | 45°54.10′ | 56°25.42′ | 17/12/2005 | 4188 | SAPs | Suspended POM |
| +Fe | 15773#28 | 45°53.81′ | 56°25.03′ | 18/12/2005 | 4191 | Megacorer | Surface sediments |
| +Fe | 15773#30 | 45°00.00′ | 56°05.00′ | 26/12/2004–20/12/2005 | 3195 | Sediment trap mooring | Sinking POM flux |
| +Fe | 15773#31 | 45°53.56′ | 56°25.77′ | 20/12/2005 | 4200 | Megacorer | Surface sediments |
| +Fe | 15773#32 | 45°40.45′ | 56°33.70′ | 20/12/2005 | 4267–4270 | Trawl | Invertebrate megabenthos |
| +Fe | 15773#42 | 45°53.88′ | 56°25.38′ | 24/12/2005 | 4194–4196 | WASP | Bottom video/stills |
| HNLC | 15775#3 | 49°03.65′ | 51°14.21′ | 27/12/2005 | 4202 | Megacorer | Surface sediments |
| HNLC | 15775#4 | 48°56.21′ | 51°03.90′ | 27/12/2005 | 4182–4195 | Trawl | Invertebrate megabenthos |
| HNLC | 15775#10 | 49°03.99′ | 51°14.02′ | 29/12/2005 | 4204 | Megacorer | Surface sediments |
| HNLC | 15775#13 | 49°01.15′ | 51°04.52′ | 29/12/2005 | 4187–4191 | Trawl | Invertebrate megabenthos |
| HNLC | 15775#15 | 49°11.41′ | 51°09.56′ | 30/12/2005 | 4221 | SAPs | Suspended POM |
| HNLC | 15775#19 | 49°04.59′ | 51°13.49′ | 31/12/2005 | 4202 | Megacorer | Surface sediments |
| HNLC | 15775#23 | 49°00.03′ | 51°30.59′ | 03/01/2005–03/01/2006 | 3183 | Sediment trap mooring | Sinking POM flux |
| HNLC | 15775#26 | 49°04.63′ | 51°11.48′ | 03/01/2006 | 4169–4193 | WASP | Bottom video/stills |
| HNLC | 15775#37 | 49°01.88′ | 51°14.10′ | 05/01/2006 | 4192 | Megacorer | Surface sediments |
Figure 2Carbon fluxes determined over a period of ∼12 months in 2005 at the Crozet Plateau (see also Ref. 12): a. the +Fe site at 3183 m water depth b. the HNLC site at 3195 m water depth.
Both ∼1000 m above the seabed. Bar widths are proportional to cup opening times of the Parflux sediment traps. Bar heights represent the material supplied over the period of cup opening.
Total organic carbon (TOC), mean molar C/N, chlorophyll a and lipid concentrations (mg g−1 TOC) and ratio of chlorophyll a to pheopigments (Chl/P) in surface sediments (0–5 mm) and in sPOM at the Crozet islands abyssal locations, +Fe and HNLC at ∼4200 m.
| TOC | C/N | Chl | Chl/P | Total Lipids | FA | Br-FA | MUFA | PUFA | ALK | Sterol | Other lipids | |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| 4.2 (0.3) | 7.0 (0.7) | 0.060 (0.007) | 1.89 | 3.56 (1.08) | 0.56 (0.11) | 0.2 (0.04) | 1.17 (0.24) | 0.66 (0.49) | 0.007 (0.003) | 0.43 (0.11) | 0.081 (0.035) |
|
| 4.7 (0.5) | 4.2 | 1.618 | ND | 85.7 | 20.6 | 0.5 | 21.6 | 23.9 | 2.8 | 15.2 | 0.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| 5.1 (1.1) | 6.1 (0.85) | 0.019 (0.014) | 0.77 | 4.88 (2.54) | 1.09 (0.49) | 0.46 (0.29) | 2.67 (1.67) | 0.47 (0.48) | 0.02 (0.007) | 0.79 (0.68) | 0.11 (0.05) |
|
| 2.7 (1.1) | 4.5 | BD | ND | 51.2 | 19.4 | 1.4 | 12.3 | 5.6 | 7.2 | 5.1 | 0.1 |
Concentrations are normalised to TOC to allow comparison of chlorophyll and lipid concentrations in sPOM and sediment samples.
TOC – Total organic carbon, Chl – Chlorophyll a, FAs - saturated fatty acids, Br-FAs – branched fatty acids; MUFAs – monunsaturated fatty acids; PUFAs – polyunsaturated fatty acids; ALKs – n-alkanols; US-ALKs – unsaturated alkanols; Other lipids include branched alkanols, tritepenoids, steroidal ketones, phytol derivatives and alkenones.
Units mg g−1 (dry sediment);
Other lipids include tritepenoids, phytol derivatives, alkenones and hydrocarbons.
n = 5, standard deviation in parentheses; except for chlorophyll, where n = 2, range in parentheses.
One SAP deployment, pumped 2138 L of water, 10 mab, units µg L−1 standard deviation of 5 replicate analyses of GFF filter;
n = 5 except for chlorophyll, where n = 4;
One SAP deployment, pumped 1517 L water, 60 mab, units µg L−1 standard deviation of 5 replicate analyses of GFF filter; BD Below Detection. ND Not Determined.
Figure 3Lipid fluxes at the Crozet abyssal locations, +Fe and HNLC at 3195 and 3183 m water depth in 2005.
Labile lipids: Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) and unsaturated alkanols (U-ALK); Semi-labile lipids: Saturated fatty acids (FA), branched fatty acids (Br-FA) and n-alkanols (ALK); Refractory lipids: Sterols (STER) and other lipids including branched alkanols, triterpenoids, steroidal ketones, phytol derivatives and alkenones (OLIP).
Figure 4Seabed seafloor mosaic from WASP photographic images of:
a. & b. the +Fe site, showing substantial cover of phytodetritus patches, which are clearly visible and appear green. c. & d. for comparison the HNLC site, where there is no phytodetritus but faecal casts are visible. In each case the swath width is c. 1.2 m and the total along track distance shown is approximately 2 m. (Total area illustrated c. 20 m2).
The abundance and biomass (wet weight) of the dominant megafaunal invertebrates at abyssal sites around the Crozet Plateau.
| Species Name | Taxon | Density (+Fe) (ind. ha−1) n = 4 | Biomass (+Fe) (g ha−1) n = 4 | Rank (+Fe) Abundance (Biomass) | Density (HNLC) (ind. ha−1) n = 2 | Biomass (HNLC) (g ha−1) n = 2 | Rank (HNLC) Abundance (Biomass) |
|
| Holothuroidea |
|
| 1 (3) |
|
| |
|
| Ophiuroidea | 194.7 | 53.43 | 2 | 162.3 | 64.25 | 1 |
|
| Ophiuroidea | 128 |
| 3 | 37.9 |
| 5 |
|
| Holothuroidea |
|
| 4 |
|
| |
|
| Ophiuroidea | 41.3 | 38.53 | 5 | 18.7 | 17.61 | |
|
| Holothuroidea | 0 | 0 | 17.4 | 3.276 | ||
|
| Holothuroidea |
|
|
|
| 3 (1) | |
|
| Holothuroidea |
|
|
|
| 2 (3) | |
|
| Ophiuroidea |
|
|
|
| 4 | |
|
| Holothuroidea |
|
| (1) |
|
| (5) |
|
| Holothuroidea |
|
| (2) |
|
| |
|
| Holothuroidea |
|
| (4) |
|
| |
|
| Holothuroidea | 5.1 |
| (5) | 3.5 |
| (4) |
|
| Asteroidea | 6.8 |
| 13.1 |
| (2) |
Bold italic numbers indicate significantly different populations in terms of abundance or biomass (p<0.05; ANOVA). Rankings (1–5) for the most abundant species and those having the highest biomass (parentheses) are also shown.
Figure 5Variation in holothurian species composition between +Fe and HNLC sites.
a. Dendrogram representation using group-average clustering. Based on trawl (A–F) catch data standardized to area fished, subject to log(x+1) transformation and assessed with Bray-Curtis similarity coefficient. b. Non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination plot (ordination stress = 0) for the same data.
Figure 6Fresh wet weight biomass composition of the megabenthos at Crozet (HNLC, +Fe) and the NE Atlantic Porcupine Abyssal Plain (PAP) sites.
A. Average relative biomass of dominant holothurian families, combined ‘other holothurians’ and ‘other invertebrates’. B. Similarity of individual trawl catches based on the relative biomass of the same taxonomic groups (proportional biomass; Bray-Curtis similarity; group-average clustering).