Literature DB >> 21694988

Development and evaluation of pharmacosomes of aceclofenac.

A Semalty1, Mona Semalty, B S Rawat, D Singh, M S M Rawat.   

Abstract

Pharmacosomes are amphiphilic lipid vesicular systems containing phospholipid complexes with a potential to improve bioavailability of poorly water soluble as well as poorly lipophilic drugs. To improve the water solubility, bioavailability and minimize the gastrointestinal toxicity of aceclofenac, its pharmacosomes were prepared. Aceclofenac was complexed with phosphatidylcholine (80%) in two different ratios (1:1 and 2:1) using conventional solvent evaporation technique. Pharmacosomes thus prepared were subjected to solubility and drug content evaluation, scanning electron microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, X ray powder diffraction and in vitro dissolution study. Pharmacosomes of aceclofenac were found to be disc shaped with rough surface in scanning electron microscopy. Drug content was found to be 91.88% (w/w) for aceclofenac phospholipid complex (1:1) and 89.03% (w/w) aceclofenac-phospholipid complex (2:1). Differential scanning calorimetric thermograms and X ray powder diffraction datas confirmed the formation of phospholipid complex. Solubility and dissolution profile of the prepared complex was found to be much better than aceclofenac.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aceclofenac; bioavailability; pharmacosomes; phospholipid complex; solubility

Year:  2010        PMID: 21694988      PMCID: PMC3116301          DOI: 10.4103/0250-474X.78523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0250-474X            Impact factor:   0.975


Aceclofenac is a nonsteroidal antiinflamatory and analgesic agent. Most frequent side effects of aceclofenac on long-term administration are gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances, peptic ulceration and gastrointestinal bleeding. Apart from GI toxicity of aceclofenac, it is poorly water soluble, due to which its dissolution in GI fluid is very low, which in turn adversely affect the bioavailability[12]. Studies have reported that phosphatidylcholine (PC) complex of nonsteroidal antiinflamatory drugs (NSAIDs) improve the permeation of these drugs across the biomembranes and thereby improving their bioavailability to target sites. Phospholipids are hydrophobic zwitterionic molecules which upon complexation with diclofenac, have been reported to yield the amphiphilic products which show the improvement in water solubility of phospholipids and lipid solubility of diclofenac. In another study, the lipid complexes were also found to be reducing GI toxicity of NSAIDs[34]. GI safety of NSAIDs has been reported to be improved upon complexation or any other interaction with phospholipid. The phospholipids (acting as surfactants) provide a protective a hydrophobic cover on the surface of the mucus to protect the GI tissue[56]. A large number of lipids can bind with mucus glycoprotein by covalent and non-covalent bonds[78]. The various phospholipids can be used for the development of amphiphilic phospholipid complexes for improving the solubility in GI fluid and permeation through the biomembranes[910]. Therefore, developing the drugs as lipid complexes (pharmacosomes) may prove to be a potential approaches to improve solubility and to minimize the GI toxicity of aceclofenac. Pharmacosomes are amphiphilic complexes of drugs (containing an active hydrogen atom) bound covalently, electrostatically or by hydrogen bonds to lipids (PC). Depending on the chemical structure of the drug lipid complex these are generally obtained as colloidal dispersions existing as ultrafine vesicular, micellar, or hexagonal aggregates.. The Pharmacosomes show the high percent loading, leakage proof with respect to drug loss through leakage (which is a common drawback with liposomes). Moreover, unlike liposomes they are easy to prepare, store (high stability) and effective (high bioavailability) drug delivery systems.[1011]. Therefore the present work aims to develop and characterize the pharmacosomes of aceclofenac along with its in vitro drug release study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Aceclofenac sodium was obtained as a gift sample from Intas Pharmaceutical Ltd. Dehradun, India. Soya phosphatidylcholine (Lipoid S-80) was obtained as a gift sample from Lipoid GmbH Germany. All other chemicals were of analytical grade. Pharmacosomes of aceclofenac were prepared by conventional solvent evaporation technique[1012]. To prepare the pharmacosomes of aceclofenac sodium, it was acidified first so that active hydrogen might be available for complexation. Aceclofenac acid was prepared by acidification of an aqueous solution of aceclofenac sodium, extraction into chloroform, and subsequent recrystallization. Aceclofenac-PC complex was prepared by associating Aceclofenac acid with PC in two different molar ratios viz. 1:1 and 2:1. The accurately weighed PC and aceclofenac acid were placed in a 100 ml round bottom flask and dissolved in dichloromethane. The mixture was refluxed for 1 h. Then the solvent was evaporated off under vacuum at 40º in a rotary vacuum evaporator (Perfit Model No. 5600 Buchi type). The dried residues were collected and placed in vacuum desiccator overnight and then subjected to characterization.

Evaluation of pharmacosomes:

To determine the drug content in aceclofenac-PC complex (Complex A and Complex B with drug: PC ratio of 1:1 and 2:1), complex equivalent to 50 mg aceclofenac was weighed and added in a volumetric flask with 100 ml of pH 6.8 phosphate buffer. Then the volumetric flask was stirred continuously for 24 h on a magnetic stirrer. At the end of 24 h, dilutions were made suitably and measured for the drug content at 274 nm UV spectrophotometrically. To determine the change in solubility due to complexation, the apparent solubility of aceclofenac and aceclofenac pharmacosome was determined by adding an excess amount of drug and pharmacosome to 6 ml distilled water, 6.8 pH phosphate buffers and in n-octanol in screw capped vials. The vials were allowed to shake at 25º for 24 h in water bath. After equilibrium had been attained, the saturated solutions were centrifuge to remove excess drug (15 min, 1000 rpm). The supernatant was filtered immediately and rapidly through a 0.45 mm membrane filter and diluted suitably with same solvent to prevent crystallization. All the materials used for the filtration was brought to the same temperature as that of the solutions. Each experiment was performed in triplicate, filtered and diluted solutions were analyzed spectrophotometrically. To detect the surface morphology of the pharmacosomes, SEM of complex was performed by Scanning Electron Microscope (JEOL JSM 5600, Japan) at UGC-DAE consortium Indore, India. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) thermograms of aceclofenac acid, phosphatidylcholine (80%) and the aceclofenac-PC complex (A and B) were recorded using a differential scanning calorimeter (2910 Modulated DSC V4.4E, TA Instruments, US). The thermal behavior was studied by heating 2.0±0.2 mg of each individual sample in a covered sample pan under nitrogen gas flow. The investigations were carried out over the temperature range 25-250º with a heating rate of 10º/min. The crystalline state of aceclofenac in the different samples was evaluated with X-ray powder diffraction. Diffraction patterns were obtained on a Bruker Axs- D8 Discover Powder X-ray diffractometer, Germany. The X-ray generator was operated at 40 KV tube voltages and 40 mA of tube current, using the Ka lines of copper as the radiation source. The scanning angle ranged from 1 to 60° of 2θ in step scan mode (step width 1° min-1). Drug, phosphatidylcholine (80%), and drug-PC complexes were analyzed with X-ray diffractions. In vitro dissolution studies for drug complex as well as plain drug were performed in triplicate in a USP XXIII six station dissolution test apparatus (Veego Model No.6DR, India) at 100 rpm and at 37º. An accurately weighed amount of the complex equivalent to 100 mg of drug was placed in to 900 ml media (pH 6.8 phosphate buffer). Samples (3 ml each) of dissolution fluid were withdrawn at different intervals and replaced with the equal volume of fresh media, to maintain sink conditions. Withdrawn samples were filtered (through a 0.45 mm membrane filter) and diluted suitably and then analyzed spectrophotometrically. Results were expressed as mean values±standard deviations and the significance of the difference observed was analyzed by the Student's t-test.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Pharmacosomes of aceclofenac were prepared with two different molar ratios (1:1 and 2:1) of aceclofenac and phopsphatidylcholine in the presence of dichloromethane by conventional solvent evaporation technique. Drug content of aceclofenac in the complex, as estimated by UV Spectrophotometry (at 274 nm in pH 6.8 phosphate buffer), was found to be 91.88 % (w/w) for aceclofenac phospholipid complex (1:1) and 89.03 % (w/w) aceclofenac-phospholipid complex (2:1). Pharmacosomes showed a high percentage of drug loading, which is prime advantage over the liposomes. The good percent loading of the drug makes the delivery of drug possible for clinical use. Unlike liposomes, pharmacosomes preparations do not require any special methods like coating of these vesicular systems for improving the loading of the drug[13]. Various previous studies on pharmacosomes report that in the pharmacosomes the drug is reversibly bonded chemically with the lipids and thus show not only a good percent loading but also the better stability than liposomes[10]. Solubility of the aceclofenac complex was found to be much higher (in water and n-octanol) than the aceclofenac and aceclofenac physical mixture (Table 1). The increase in solubility of aceclofenac in the complex can be explained by the solubilization theory resulted from the formation of micelle in the medium and also by the amorphous nature of the complex. These amphiphilic surfactants (phospholipids) may increase the solubility of the drug by their wetting and dispersion properties[314]. Unlike non-polar nature of aceclofenac, the complex showed an amphiphilic nature, which in turn may prove to be responsible for improved bioavailability of the drug[7].
TABLE 1

SOLUBILITY STUDY OF ACECLOFENAC AND ITS PHARMACOSOMES

SOLUBILITY STUDY OF ACECLOFENAC AND ITS PHARMACOSOMES Scanning Electron Micrographs of the complex are shown in fig. 1. Pharmacosomes were found to be of disc shaped with rough surface morphology. Some were seen as aggregates in SEM. Complexes were found to be as free flowing particles. As the phospholipids are natural component their different purity grades may yield products with different morphology. The surface was found to be sticky in the complexes of aspirin prepared with low purity grades (40%) of phospholipids. On the other hand the surface of the complexes prepared with the high purity grades of phospholipids (80%) was rough, non-sticky and free flowing in nature[15].
Fig. 1

Scanning electron micrography of aceclofenac and pharmacosomes (a) Aceclofenac, (b) Phospholipid, (c) Pharmacosome of aceclofenac 1:1(drug: lipid ratio) and (d) Pharmacosome of aceclofenac 2:1(drug: lipid ratio)

Scanning electron micrography of aceclofenac and pharmacosomes (a) Aceclofenac, (b) Phospholipid, (c) Pharmacosome of aceclofenac 1:1(drug: lipid ratio) and (d) Pharmacosome of aceclofenac 2:1(drug: lipid ratio) For evaluating interaction/complexation of aceclofenac with PC, DSC analysis was performed on aceclofenac, PC, and the aceclofenac-PC complex[16]. The results of the DSC test confirmed the formation of a complex of aceclofenac and PC due to presence of unique peak in the complex which were entirely different from the positions of the peaks of aceclofenac and PC (fig. 2).
Fig. 2

DSC thermograms of drug, complex and physical mixture Aceclofenac (a), Phosphatidylcholine (80% PC) (b), aceclofenac-PC complex (2:1) (c) and aceclofenac-PC complex (1:1) (d).

DSC thermograms of drug, complex and physical mixture Aceclofenac (a), Phosphatidylcholine (80% PC) (b), aceclofenac-PC complex (2:1) (c) and aceclofenac-PC complex (1:1) (d). PC showed two major peaks at 83.21º and 107.90º and a small peak at 64.45º, while aceclofenac showed a sharp endothermic peak at 154.01º. On the other hand complex (2:1) showed a broad peak (at 248.16º) and a sharp peak at 43.64º. Complex (1:1) showed two sharp peaks at 51.16º and 64.80º. There are clearly visible differences in the peaks between the individual complex and components of the complex. The thermogram of the complex was not showing the peaks representing aceclofenac and phospholipids. Moreover, the phase transition temperature of the compex was found to be lowered than that of PC. It has been reported that reduction in melting point and enthalpy accounts for reduced crystallinity of the drug[17]. The DSC data of the prepared complex showed a noticeable reduction in the enthalpy as well as the melting point in comparison with aceclofenac and PC. This confirmed the interaction between drug and PC. These results are well supported by various previous studies done on the phospholipid complexes of some phytoconstituents like silybin, puerarin curcumin, naringenin and gallic acid[18-20]. Acemetacin and indomethacin when complexed with 1,2-dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine, showed the similar changes in the DSC thermogram of their complexes[21]. To see the changes in crystallinity of the drug in the aceclofenac phospholipid complex, XRPD analysis was conducted. The patterns of changes in peaks may indicate the degree of crystallinity (fig. 3). The integrated intensity (the area under the curves of the XRPD patterns) is the characteristics of given sample[22]. It was observed that crystalline diffraction peaks of aceclofenac were disappeared in XRPD of the complex which in turn confirmed the formation of phospholipid complex. The chemical bonding between drug and the phospholipids responsible for the development of pharmacosomes might have resulted into the significant change in XRPD. The phospholipid complexes of insulin and salmon calcitonin have been reported to improve the bioavailability of these proteins with similar results for their DSC and XRPD study[2324].
Fig. 3

X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) study of aceclofenac and its complexes (a) Aceclofenac; (b) Pharmacosome of aceclofenac (aceclofenac-PC complex) in (1:1); and (c) in (2:1) ratio of drug and the phosphatidylcholine

X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) study of aceclofenac and its complexes (a) Aceclofenac; (b) Pharmacosome of aceclofenac (aceclofenac-PC complex) in (1:1); and (c) in (2:1) ratio of drug and the phosphatidylcholine The Pharmacosomes of aceclofenac showed better dissolution profile than the aceclofenac acid. Unlike the free aceclofenac (which showed a total of only 68.69% drug release at the end of 4 h) pharmacosome (1:1) showed 79.78% while pharmacosome (2:1) showed 76.17% at the end of 4 h of dissolution study in pH 6.8 phosphate buffer (fig. 4). The solid dissolution is a complex process which is affected by various factorslike the particle size, crystal habit, surface area, surface energies and wettability[25]. Wetting and dispersion properties of phospholipids (an amphiphilic surfactant) increased the solubility of the drug and hence improved the dissolution profile of the complex. The in-vitro drug release of the complexes of phytoconstituents like silybin and some xanthones, showed the pH (of media) dependent release[2627].
Fig. 4

Dissolution study of aceclofenac- phospholipid complex and aceclofenac acid in pH 6.8 phosphate buffer

(-♦-) aceclofenac acid; (-■-) aceclofenac-phospholipid complex (1:1); (-×-) aceclofenac phospholipid complex (2:1)

Dissolution study of aceclofenac- phospholipid complex and aceclofenac acid in pH 6.8 phosphate buffer (-♦-) aceclofenac acid; (-■-) aceclofenac-phospholipid complex (1:1); (-×-) aceclofenac phospholipid complex (2:1) In the present study aceclofenacphospholipid complex (pharmacosomes) were prepared by a simple and reproducible method and evaluated for various physicochemical parameters. The physicochemical investigations showed that aceclofenac formed a complex with phospholipids with better solubility and dissolution profile. The DSC and XRPD studies confirmed the formation of the complex. Thus it can be concluded that the pharmacosomes of aceclofenac may be of effective in improving bioavailability and gastrointestinal safety of the drug. The pharmacosomes may be developed for adding the biopharmaceutical values (like solubility, permeability) to the delivery of NSAIDs as well as phytoconstituents for improving their bioavailability and GI safety.
  18 in total

1.  Curcumin-phospholipid complex: Preparation, therapeutic evaluation and pharmacokinetic study in rats.

Authors:  Kuntal Maiti; Kakali Mukherjee; Arunava Gantait; Bishnu Pada Saha; Pulok K Mukherjee
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 5.875

2.  The preparation of silybin-phospholipid complex and the study on its pharmacokinetics in rats.

Authors:  Xiao Yanyu; Song Yunmei; Chen Zhipeng; Ping Qineng
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 5.875

Review 3.  Gastric mucus and the mucosal barrier.

Authors:  B L Slomiany; J Sarosiek; A Slomiany
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.404

4.  Biodegradable nanoparticles loaded with insulin-phospholipid complex for oral delivery: preparation, in vitro characterization and in vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Fude Cui; Kai Shi; Liqiang Zhang; Anjin Tao; Yoshiaki Kawashima
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  Comparative physicochemical characterization of phospholipids complex of puerarin formulated by conventional and supercritical methods.

Authors:  Ying Li; Da-Jian Yang; Shi-Lin Chen; Si-Bao Chen; Albert Sun-Chi Chan
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-09-08       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 6.  Role of mucus in gastric mucosal protection.

Authors:  B L Slomiany; A Slomiany
Journal:  J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.011

7.  Luminal surface hydrophobicity of canine gastric mucosa is dependent on a surface mucous gel.

Authors:  P J Goddard; Y C Kao; L M Lichtenberger
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Development and physicochemical evaluation of pharmacosomes of diclofenac.

Authors:  Ajay Semalty; Mona Semalty; Devendra Singh; M S M Rawat
Journal:  Acta Pharm       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  Biodegradable nanoparticles containing protein-fatty acid complexes for oral delivery of salmon calcitonin.

Authors:  Hyuk Sang Yoo; Tae Gwan Park
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.534

10.  Pharmacology of the potent new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent aceclofenac.

Authors:  M Grau; J Guasch; J L Montero; A Felipe; E Carrasco; S Juliá
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1991-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Development, In-Vitro Characterization and Preclinical Evaluation of Esomeprazole-Encapsulated Proniosomal Formulation for the Enhancement of Anti-Ulcer Activity.

Authors:  Dibyalochan Mohanty; Ameeduzzafar Zafar; Mohammed Jafar; Atul Kumar Upadhyay; Mohammad Akiful Haque; Jeetendra Kumar Gupta; Vasudha Bakshi; Mohammed M Ghoneim; Sultan Alshehri; Mohammed Asadullah Jahangir; Mohammed Javed Ansari
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.927

2.  Improved oral bioavailability of 20(R)-25-methoxyl-dammarane-3β, 12β, 20-triol using nanoemulsion based on phospholipid complex: design, characterization, and in vivo pharmacokinetics in rats.

Authors:  Xiangrong Zhang; Yi Zhang; Shuang Guo; Feifei Bai; Tong Wu; Yuqing Zhao
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 3.  Lipid-Based Nanocarriers for Neurological Disorders: A Review of the State-of-the-Art and Therapeutic Success to Date.

Authors:  Bwalya Angel Witika; Madan Sai Poka; Patrick Hulisani Demana; Scott Kaba Matafwali; Siyabonga Melamane; Sandile Maswazi Malungelo Khamanga; Pedzisai Anotida Makoni
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 6.525

Review 4.  Pharmacosomes: an emerging novel vesicular drug delivery system for poorly soluble synthetic and herbal drugs.

Authors:  Archana Pandita; Pooja Sharma
Journal:  ISRN Pharm       Date:  2013-09-09

Review 5.  Lipid-Based Nanovesicular Drug Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Tania Limongi; Francesca Susa; Monica Marini; Marco Allione; Bruno Torre; Roberto Pisano; Enzo di Fabrizio
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 5.076

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.