Literature DB >> 21694745

Sacral nerve stimulation.

Stig Norderval1, Mona Rydningen, Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo, Dag Lein, Barthold Vonen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sacral nerve stimulation implies electrical stimulation of a sacral nerve root by an electrode and a pacemaker. Within the past few years, sacral nerve stimulation has become a possible treatment option for selected patients with urinary retention, urinary incontinence, anal incontinence and constipation. The method is furthermore being tested for several other conditions.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The article presents the method and treatment results following various indications based on the authors' own experience and non-systematic PubMed search.
RESULTS: During a test period an external pacemaker is used for 3-30 days, with length of test differing according to the indication. A positive test (improvement of symptoms by 50 % or more) is achieved by 70-90 % of patients with anal incontinence, 70 % with urinary non-obstructive retention, 52-77 % with urinary urge incontinence and 43-72 % with constipation. Sacral nerve stimulation may also be effective in patients with chronic pelvic pain. Following implantation of a pacemaker a sustainable effect is seen in 50-90 % of patients with a positive test. Up to 75 % of patients will need repeated follow-up including pacemaker reprogramming or reoperations due to diminished effect. The longevity of the pacemaker is 3-10 years, and it must be replaced operatively when the battery has depleted.
INTERPRETATION: Treatment with sacral nerve stimulation may be efficient over time in patients with various pelvic floor dysfunctions, especially anal incontinence and non-obstructive urinary retention. Most of the patients will need close follow-up in order to maintain an optimal result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21694745     DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.10.1417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen        ISSN: 0029-2001


  6 in total

1.  Sacral nerve stimulation--hidden costs (uncovered).

Authors:  M Zeiton; Sara Faily; James Nicholson; Karen Telford; Abhiram Sharma
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Sacral neuromodulation: an effective treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Federica Puccini; Alka Bhide; Suzy Elneil; G Alessandro Digesu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  WITHDRAWN: Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for treatment of constipation in children.

Authors:  Ruey Terng Ng; Way Seah Lee; Hak Lee Ang; Kai Ming Teo; Yee Ian Yik; Nai Ming Lai
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-12

Review 4.  Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for treatment of constipation in children.

Authors:  Ruey Terng Ng; Way Seah Lee; Hak Lee Ang; Kai Ming Teo; Yee Ian Yik; Nai Ming Lai
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-11

Review 5.  Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for treatment of constipation in children.

Authors:  Ruey Terng Ng; Way Seah Lee; Hak Lee Ang; Kai Ming Teo; Yee Ian Yik; Nai Ming Lai
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-05

6.  Sacral neuromodulation versus personalized conservative treatment in patients with idiopathic slow-transit constipation: study protocol of the No.2-trial, a multicenter open-label randomized controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  S C M Heemskerk; A H Rotteveel; M A Benninga; C I M Baeten; A A M Masclee; J Melenhorst; S M J van Kuijk; C D Dirksen; S O Breukink
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.571

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.