PURPOSE: To develop instruments for measuring empathic and sympathetic orientations in patient care and to provide evidence in support of their psychometrics. METHOD: Third-year medical students at Jefferson Medical College responded to four clinical vignettes in 2010. For each vignette, students indicated the extent of their agreement with an empathic response (conveying their understanding of patients' concerns) and with a sympathetic response (sharing patients' feelings). The authors calculated, based on students' responses to the clinical vignettes, two measures of empathic and sympathetic orientation. Students also completed the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE) and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). RESULTS: Of the 258 students in the class, 201 (78%) responded to all four vignettes and completed the JSE and IRI. The authors confirmed construct validity of the measures of empathic and sympathetic orientation through factor analysis. The empathic orientation was significantly associated with the measure of empathy (as measured by the JSE) but not with measures of sympathy (as measured by specific scales of the IRI). Conversely, sympathetic orientation was significantly associated with measures of sympathy. Thus, these results support the validity of the empathic and sympathetic orientation measures as assessed by four clinical vignettes. Coefficient alphas for the two measures were, respectively, 0.79 and 0.84. CONCLUSIONS: The validated measures of empathic and sympathetic orientation provide research opportunities to enhance the understanding of the contributions of empathy and sympathy to physicians' competence and patient outcomes.
PURPOSE: To develop instruments for measuring empathic and sympathetic orientations in patient care and to provide evidence in support of their psychometrics. METHOD: Third-year medical students at Jefferson Medical College responded to four clinical vignettes in 2010. For each vignette, students indicated the extent of their agreement with an empathic response (conveying their understanding of patients' concerns) and with a sympathetic response (sharing patients' feelings). The authors calculated, based on students' responses to the clinical vignettes, two measures of empathic and sympathetic orientation. Students also completed the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE) and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). RESULTS: Of the 258 students in the class, 201 (78%) responded to all four vignettes and completed the JSE and IRI. The authors confirmed construct validity of the measures of empathic and sympathetic orientation through factor analysis. The empathic orientation was significantly associated with the measure of empathy (as measured by the JSE) but not with measures of sympathy (as measured by specific scales of the IRI). Conversely, sympathetic orientation was significantly associated with measures of sympathy. Thus, these results support the validity of the empathic and sympathetic orientation measures as assessed by four clinical vignettes. Coefficient alphas for the two measures were, respectively, 0.79 and 0.84. CONCLUSIONS: The validated measures of empathic and sympathetic orientation provide research opportunities to enhance the understanding of the contributions of empathy and sympathy to physicians' competence and patient outcomes.
Authors: Helena B M S Paro; Renata M Daud-Gallotti; Iolanda C Tibério; Rogério M C Pinto; Mílton A Martins Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Alison Watson; Andrea Power; Christopher Brown; Wael El-Deredy; Anthony Jones Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2012-03-30 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Jeffrey S Bedwell; Michael T Compton; Florian G Jentsch; Andrew E Deptula; Sandra M Goulding; Erin B Tone Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-11-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Arthur R Williams; David D Williams; Phoebe D Williams; Farrokh Alemi; Hosai Hesham; Blaine Donley; Raya E Kheirbek Journal: Biomed Eng Online Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 2.819