OBJECTIVE: Patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy using three courses of cisplatin. However, many patients were unable to complete the scheduled cisplatin treatment due to adverse effects. The objective of this study was to retrospectively elucidate the source of the low completion rate of cisplatin courses. METHODS: Between November 2007 and 28 May 2010, patients with head and neck cancer were treated with curative intent according to the concurrent chemoradiotherapy protocol (66-70 Gy at 2 Gy/day with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 22 and 43). Treatment courses, hematological data and other parameters were investigated, and the treatment completion rates and reasons for treatment failure were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 28 patients, cisplatin was administered during the period of radiotherapy a total of 3 times in 9 (32%) patients, 2 times in 15 (54%) patients and only 1 time in 4 (14%) patients. Multiple regression analysis of the development of neutropenia at 3 weeks after the first cisplatin administration revealed that the serum albumin level was a significant explanatory variable (R(2)= 0.664, β = 0.517, P< 0.01). Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient showed a strong correlation between the serum albumin level and the neutrophil count after 3 weeks (r = 0.605, P< 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The treatment completion rate by this protocol was low in head and neck cancer patients even when the cisplatin dose was reduced to 80 mg/m(2). This tendency was seen in patients with a low serum albumin level.
OBJECTIVE:Patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy using three courses of cisplatin. However, many patients were unable to complete the scheduled cisplatin treatment due to adverse effects. The objective of this study was to retrospectively elucidate the source of the low completion rate of cisplatin courses. METHODS: Between November 2007 and 28 May 2010, patients with head and neck cancer were treated with curative intent according to the concurrent chemoradiotherapy protocol (66-70 Gy at 2 Gy/day with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 22 and 43). Treatment courses, hematological data and other parameters were investigated, and the treatment completion rates and reasons for treatment failure were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 28 patients, cisplatin was administered during the period of radiotherapy a total of 3 times in 9 (32%) patients, 2 times in 15 (54%) patients and only 1 time in 4 (14%) patients. Multiple regression analysis of the development of neutropenia at 3 weeks after the first cisplatin administration revealed that the serum albumin level was a significant explanatory variable (R(2)= 0.664, β = 0.517, P< 0.01). Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient showed a strong correlation between the serum albumin level and the neutrophil count after 3 weeks (r = 0.605, P< 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The treatment completion rate by this protocol was low in head and neck cancerpatients even when the cisplatin dose was reduced to 80 mg/m(2). This tendency was seen in patients with a low serum albumin level.