Literature DB >> 21692633

Histologic comparison of healing after ridge preservation using human demineralized bone matrix putty with one versus two different-sized bone particles.

Tram N Hoang1, Brian L Mealey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ridge preservation can minimize the loss of alveolar bone subsequent to tooth extraction in preparation for implant therapy. The purpose of this study is to histologically and clinically compare human demineralized bone matrix (DBM) putty with one size of bone particles (SPS) to human DBM putty with two different sizes of bone particles (multiple particle sizes [MPS]) in ridge preservation after molar extractions.
METHODS: Molar tooth extraction and ridge preservation were performed in 20 participants for each treatment group. Approximately 20 weeks after grafting, core biopsies were obtained during implant placement and analyzed under light microscopy. Specimens were analyzed for the percentage area of vital bone, residual graft particles, and non-mineralized structures (connective tissue/other non-mineralized tissue [CT]). Changes in alveolar ridge dimensions were also determined.
RESULTS: Sixteen participants in the SPS group and 14 in the MPS group completed the study. The SPS group had a mean of 49% vital bone, 8% residual graft, and 43% CT. The MPS group had 53%, 5%, and 42%, respectively. Patients in both groups lost a mean of <1 mm alveolar height on the buccal and lingual aspects and <1.5 mm of total ridge width. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups for any clinical or histologic parameters.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that addition of larger bone particles to DBM putty does not offer additional benefit in the preservation of alveolar bone after the extraction of molar teeth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21692633     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2011.110209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  6 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development.

Authors:  Momen A Atieh; Nabeel H M Alsabeeha; Alan G T Payne; Warwick Duncan; Clovis M Faggion; Marco Esposito
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-28

2.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development.

Authors:  Momen A Atieh; Nabeel Hm Alsabeeha; Alan Gt Payne; Sara Ali; Clovis M Jr Faggion; Marco Esposito
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-26

3.  Alveolar ridge preservation using an open membrane approach for sockets with bone deficiency: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Dong-Joo Sun; Hyun-Chang Lim; Dong-Woon Lee
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.932

4.  Osteoconductivity of Bovine Xenograft Granules of Different Sizes in Sinus Lift: A Histomorphometric Study in Rabbits.

Authors:  Eduardo Pires Godoy; Karol Alí Apaza Alccayhuaman; Daniele Botticelli; Andrea Amaroli; Vitor Ferreira Balan; Erick Ricardo Silva; Samuel Porfirio Xavier
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31

5.  Ridge preservation for implant therapy: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Tomlin; Shelby J Nelson; Jeffrey A Rossmann
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2014-05-16

Review 6.  The Influence of Different Grafting Materials on Alveolar Ridge Preservation: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jad Majzoub; Andrea Ravida; Thomas Starch-Jensen; Mustafa Tattan; Fernando Suárez-López Del Amo
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2019-09-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.