Susanna Toivanen1. 1. Centre for Health Equity Studies (CHESS), Stockholm University/Karolinska Institute, Sweden. susanna.toivanen@chess.su.se
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study explored the interplay between work stress and socioeconomic position and investigated if the interaction of work stress and low socioeconomic position is associated with poorer health. METHODS: A representative sample of the Swedish working population, including 2,613 employees (48.7% women) aged 19-64 years, was analyzed. The health outcomes were poor self-rated health, psychological distress, and musculoskeletal pain. Work stress was operationalized as job strain and effort-reward imbalance, and socioeconomic position as occupational class. Interaction analysis was based on departure from additivity as criterion, and a synergy index (SI) was applied, using odds ratios (ORs) from logistic regressions for women and men. RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS: In fully adjusted models, work stress, and in a lesser extent also socioeconomic position, was associated with higher odds for the three health complaints. The prevalence of poorer health was highest among those individuals jointly exposed to high work stress and low occupational class, with ORs ranging from 1.94 to 6.77 (95%CI 1.01-18.65) for poor self-rated health, 2.42-8.44 (95%CI 1.28-27.06) for psychological distress and 1.93-3.93 (95%CI 1.11-6.78) for musculoskeletal pain. The joint influence of work stress and low socioeconomic position on health was additive rather than multiplicative.
BACKGROUND: This study explored the interplay between work stress and socioeconomic position and investigated if the interaction of work stress and low socioeconomic position is associated with poorer health. METHODS: A representative sample of the Swedish working population, including 2,613 employees (48.7% women) aged 19-64 years, was analyzed. The health outcomes were poor self-rated health, psychological distress, and musculoskeletal pain. Work stress was operationalized as job strain and effort-reward imbalance, and socioeconomic position as occupational class. Interaction analysis was based on departure from additivity as criterion, and a synergy index (SI) was applied, using odds ratios (ORs) from logistic regressions for women and men. RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS: In fully adjusted models, work stress, and in a lesser extent also socioeconomic position, was associated with higher odds for the three health complaints. The prevalence of poorer health was highest among those individuals jointly exposed to high work stress and low occupational class, with ORs ranging from 1.94 to 6.77 (95%CI 1.01-18.65) for poor self-rated health, 2.42-8.44 (95%CI 1.28-27.06) for psychological distress and 1.93-3.93 (95%CI 1.11-6.78) for musculoskeletal pain. The joint influence of work stress and low socioeconomic position on health was additive rather than multiplicative.
Authors: Stephen J Mooney; Stephanie T Grady; Nona Sotoodehnia; Rozenn N Lemaitre; Erin R Wallace; April F Mohanty; Jean Yee; David S Siscovick; Thomas D Rea; Barbara McKnight; Pui-Yan Kwok; Angel C Y Mak; Stephanie Hesselson; Gina S Lovasi Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Jenni Kulmala; Timo Hinrichs; Timo Törmäkangas; Mikaela B von Bonsdorff; Monika E von Bonsdorff; Clas-Håkan Nygård; Matti Klockars; Jorma Seitsamo; Juhani Ilmarinen; Taina Rantanen Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2014-11-07
Authors: Nathan Hutting; Josephine A Engels; J Bart Staal; Yvonne F Heerkens; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 2.646
Authors: Magdalena Stadin; Maria Nordin; Anders Broström; Linda L Magnusson Hanson; Hugo Westerlund; Eleonor I Fransson Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Magdalena Stadin; Maria Nordin; Anders Broström; Linda L Magnusson Hanson; Hugo Westerlund; Eleonor I Fransson Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 3.015