Literature DB >> 21691591

The Use of Sample Weights in Hot Deck Imputation.

Rebecca R Andridge1, Roderick J Little.   

Abstract

A common strategy for handling item nonresponse in survey sampling is hot deck imputation, where each missing value is replaced with an observed response from a "similar" unit. We discuss here the use of sampling weights in the hot deck. The naive approach is to ignore sample weights in creation of adjustment cells, which effectively imputes the unweighted sample distribution of respondents in an adjustment cell, potentially causing bias. Alternative approaches have been proposed that use weights in the imputation by incorporating them into the probabilities of selection for each donor. We show by simulation that these weighted hot decks do not correct for bias when the outcome is related to the sampling weight and the response propensity. The correct approach is to use the sampling weight as a stratifying variable alongside additional adjustment variables when forming adjustment cells.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21691591      PMCID: PMC3117228     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Off Stat        ISSN: 0282-423X            Impact factor:   0.920


  4 in total

1.  A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures.

Authors:  L M Collins; J L Schafer; C M Kam
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2001-12

2.  On weighting the rates in non-response weights.

Authors:  Roderick J Little; Sonya Vartivarian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Handling missing data in survey research.

Authors:  J M Brick; G Kalton
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non-response.

Authors:  Rebecca R Andridge; Roderick J A Little
Journal:  Int Stat Rev       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.217

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  The HCUP SID Imputation Project: Improving Statistical Inferences for Health Disparities Research by Imputing Missing Race Data.

Authors:  Yan Ma; Wei Zhang; Stephen Lyman; Yihe Huang
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non-response.

Authors:  Rebecca R Andridge; Roderick J A Little
Journal:  Int Stat Rev       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Multiple imputation with missing data indicators.

Authors:  Lauren J Beesley; Irina Bondarenko; Michael R Elliot; Allison W Kurian; Steven J Katz; Jeremy Mg Taylor
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 2.494

4.  Innate and adaptive immune cell subsets as risk factors for coronary heart disease in two population-based cohorts.

Authors:  Nels C Olson; Colleen M Sitlani; Margaret F Doyle; Sally A Huber; Alan L Landay; Russell P Tracy; Bruce M Psaty; Joseph A Delaney
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 5.162

5.  Understanding Racial Disparities in COVID-19-Related Complications: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Jessica L Harding; Shivani A Patel; Teaniese Davis; Rachel E Patzer; Bennett McDonald; Doraina Walker-Williams; Ram Jagannathan; Larissa Teunis; Jennifer Gander
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-10-06

6.  Paternal Diet before Conception and Its Social Determinants in the Elfe Cohort.

Authors:  Blandine de Lauzon-Guillain; Sacha Krinitzki; Sandrine Lioret; Marie-Aline Charles
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 6.706

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.