Literature DB >> 21691575

Mitochondrial complex 1 gene analysis in keratoconus.

Dhananjay Pathak1, Bhagabat Nayak, Manvendra Singh, Namrata Sharma, Radhika Tandon, Rajesh Sinha, Jeewan S Titiyal, Rima Dada.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Keratoconus is characterized by the thinning of corneal stroma, resulting in reduced vision. The exact etiology of keratoconus (KC) is still unknown. The involvement of oxidative stress (OS) in this disease has been reported. However, the exact mechanism of OS in keratoconus is still unknown. Thus we planned this study to screen mitochondrial complex I genes for sequence changes in keratoconus patients and controls, as mitochondrial complex I is the chief source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production.
METHODS: A total of 20 keratoconus cases and 20 healthy controls without any ocular disorder were enrolled in this study. Mitochondrial complex I genes (ND1, 2, 3, 4, 4L, 5, and 6) were amplified in all patients and controls using 12 pairs of primers by PCR. After sequencing, DNA sequences were analyzed against the mitochondrial reference sequence NC_012920. Haplogroup frequency based Principle Component Analysis (PCA) was constructed to determine whether the gene pool of keratoconus patients is closer to major populations in India.
RESULTS: DNA sequencing revealed a total 84 nucleotide variations in patients and 29 in controls. Of 84 nucleotide changes, 18 variations were non-synonymous and two novel frame-shift mutations were detected in cases. Non-synonymous mtDNA sequence variations may account for increased ROS and decreased ATP production. This ultimately leads to OS; which is a known cause for variety of corneal abnormalities. Haplotype analysis showed that most of the patients were clustered under the haplogroups: T, C4a2a, R2'TJ, M21'Q1a, M12'G2a2a, M8'CZ and M7a2a, which are present as negligible frequency in normal Indian population, whereas only few patients were found to be a part of the other haplogroups like U7 (Indo-European), R2 and R31, whose origin is contentious.
CONCLUSIONS: Mt complex I sequence variations are the main cause of elevated ROS production which leads oxidative stress. This oxidative stress then starts a cascade of events which ultimately can lead to keratoconus. Prompt antioxidant therapy should be initiated in keratoconus patients to minimize ROS related damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21691575      PMCID: PMC3116726     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Vis        ISSN: 1090-0535            Impact factor:   2.367


Introduction

Keratoconus (KC; Mendelian Inheritance in Man [MIM] 14830) is a rare disease characterized by thinning of the corneal stroma, resulting in reduced vision, irregular astigmatism and corneal scarring. The age of onset is mostly at puberty with the estimated prevalence of KC is 1–4 in 2000 in general population. Exact cause of KC is still unclear, although pathogenesis may involve genetic [1,2], environmental and behavioral factors [3,4]. KC is one of the most common cause for corneal transplantation. Inheritance of KC does not usually follow a simple Mendelian inheritance in majority of cases and appears to be sporadic [5], but positive family history is reported in 6% to 10% of patients [6]. Both recessive and dominant pattern of inheritance have been reported with predominance of autosomal dominant inheritance and disease shows incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity [7,8]. Since, cornea is an avascular structure and first target of ultraviolet radiation entering the eyes, it is potentially vulnerable to oxidative stress [9]. Studies report the role of oxidative damage in KC and other corneal diseases [10,11]. In a previous study from our laboratory we have reported association of mtDNA variations with congenital glaucoma [12]. We have shown the presence of mtDNA complex I sequence variations which were associated with elevated ROS production in congenital glaucoma. In this pilot study we reported the results of mitochondrial complex I gene analysis in 20 keratoconus patients negative for Visual System Homeobox 1 (VSX1) mutations [13].

Methods

Ethics statement

All patients provided informed consent before participation in this study. The study was approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB00006862; All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India).

Clinical examination and selection of cases

A total of twenty keratoconus patients (Table 1) presented (during April 2009 to April 2010) at the Dr. R. P. Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences (AIIMS, New Delhi, India) were enrolled in this study. Clinical evaluation involved Ultrasonic Pachymetry, videokeratography (VKG), Orbscan, visual testing, fundoscopy, slitlamp-biomicroscopy, and retinoscopy. Of these patients, 14 were males and 6 were females. The mean age of presentation was 17.2 years. Diagnosis of keratoconus involved the presence of characteristic topographic features, such as inferior or central corneal steepening, or an asymmetric bowtie pattern with skewing of the radial axes, and the presence of one or more of the following characteristic, clinical features in one or both eyes: conical corneal deformation, munsen sign, corneal stromal thinning, a Fleischer ring or Vogt striae. Family history up to three generations was collected and pedigrees were drawn. All 20 cases were sporadic without any family history. All keratoconus cases secondary to causes like trauma, surgery, Ehlers Danlos syndrome, osteogenesis imperfecta, and pellucid marginal degeneration were excluded from the study. Twenty ethnically matched normal individuals without any ocular disorder were enrolled as controls. Health information was obtained from controls through the questionnaire; all underwent ophthalmological examination. Five milliliters of blood was collected by venipuncture in EDTA (EDTA) vaccutainers (Greiner Bio-One GmbH, Frickenhausen, Germany) from both patients and controls. DNA was extracted from whole blood samples by the inorganic method. For the population study, controls were taken from published data defining the lineage of the Indian population [14,15].
Table 1

Clinical phenotype of keratoconus patients.

Patient ID
Age in years
Sex
Visual acuity in Snellen’s chart
Munsen sign
Vogt's striae
Hydrops
Scarring
Keratometry in VKG (in diopters)
Ultrasonic pachymetry (in micrometers)
   ODOSODOSODOSODOSODOSODOSODOS
KC1
20
F
6/12
6/12
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
45.62
46.37
490
414
KC2
12
M
6/60
6/60
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
56
52
344
347
KC3
22
F
6/12
6/6
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
56.6
49.5
396
412
KC4
20
M
6/12
6/9
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
48.5
45
406
498
KC5
20
M
6/24
6/6
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
-
54
46.5
410
520
KC6
19
M
6/12
6/12
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
46.5
46.5
501
488
KC7
18
M
618
6/60
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
52.12
Distorted
480
344
KC8
14
F
6/36
6/24
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
>52
52
336
346
KC9
20
M
6/9
6/9
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
50.5
49.1
460
436
KC10
22
M
6/24
6/9
+
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
52
47.1
344
420
KC11
19
M
6/18
6/18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
54.75
56
410
400
KC12
17
M
6/12
6/18
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
51.12
49.87
419
414
KC13
20
F
6/9
6/12
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
48.5
51.25
440
456
KC14
10
M
6/12
6/9
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
61.12
48.75
402
512
KC15
22
F
6/12
6/12
+
+
-
+
-
-
+
+
48.5
48
502
486
KC16
18
F
6/6
6/60
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
+
Distorted
49.5
510
265
KC17
22
M
6/6
6/9
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
49.5
51.75
399
353
KC18
15
M
6/9
6/18
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
48.25
48.75
485
493
KC19
20
F
6/60
6/60
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Distorted
Distorted
230
330
KC2016M6/126/9++++----4848.25484496

Key: M=male; F=female; OD=right eye; OS=left eye; +=positive; -=negative; VKG=videokeratography.

Key: M=male; F=female; OD=right eye; OS=left eye; +=positive; -=negative; VKG=videokeratography.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and sequence analysis of the mitochondrial DNA coding region

The mitochondrial complex 1 (ND1, ND2, ND3, ND4, ND4L, ND5, and ND6 [ND stands for NADH dehydrogenase]) was amplified in all patients and controls using 12 pairs of primers using cycling conditions as described by Kumar and associates [16] and presented in Table 2. Briefly, PCR amplifications for all primer sets were performed in a 40-μl volume containing 1.0 μl of 20 μM stock solution for each primer (Eurofins Genomics India pvt Ltd, Bangalore, India), 100 ng of genomic DNA, 1 unit of Taq polymerase (Banglore Genei, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India), 0.1 mM of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate (dNTP), and 4 μl of 10× PCR buffer (with 15 mM MgCl2) by means of 30 cycles of amplification, each consisting of 30 s denaturation at 94 °C, 30 s annealing at 55 °C, and 1 min extension at 72 °C. Finally, an extension for 5 min at 72 °C was performed. Amplified PCR products were purified using a gel/PCR DNA fragments extraction kit (catalog number DF100; Geneaid Biotech Ltd., Sijhih City, Taiwan). Purified PCR products of both primers (forward and reverse) were sent for sequencing to MCLAB (Molecular Cloning Laboratories, South San Francisco, CA). All sequence variants from both KC patients and controls were compared to the Human Mitochondrial reference sequence NC_012920 provided by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) using ClustalW2 (multiple sequence alignment program for DNA; European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL)-European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI).
Table 2

Primer used for amplification of complex-I gene of mitochondria.

Primer namePrimer sequenceProduct sizeMelting temperature (°C)
1
F-3’GGACTAACCCCTATACCTTCTGC5’
  
  
  
R-3’GGCAGGTCAATTTCACTGGT5’
859
55
2
F-3’AAATCTTACCCCGCCTGTTT5’
  
  
  
R-3’AGGAATGCCATTGCGATTAG5’
885
55
3
F-3’TACTTCACAAAGCGCCTTCC5’
  
  
  
R-3’ATGAAGAATAGGGCGAAGGG5’
831
55
4
F-3’TGGCTCCTTTAACCTCTCCA5’
  
  
  
R-3’AAGGATTATGGATGCGGTTG5’
903
55
5
F-3’ACTAATTAATCCCCTGGCCC5’
  
  
  
R-3’CCTGGGGTGGGTTTTGTATG5’
978
55
6
F-3’TCTCCATCTATTGATGAGGGTCT5’
  
  
  
R-3’AATTAGGCTGTGGGTGGTTG5’
892
55
7
F-3’GCCATACTAGTCTTTGCCGC5’
  
  
  
R-3’TTGAGAATGAGTGTGAGGCG5’
859
55
8
F-3’TCACTCTCACTGCCCAAGAA5’
  
  
  
R-3’GGAGAATGGGGGATAGGTGT5’
801
55
9
F-3’TATCACTCTCCTACTTACAG5’
  
  
  
R-3’AGAAGGATATAATTCCTACG5’
865
55
10
F-3’AAACAACCCAGCTCTCCCTAA5’
  
  
  
R-3’TCGATGATGTGGTCTTTGGA5’
976
55
11
F-3’ACATCTGTACCCACGCCTTC5’
  
  
  
R-3’AGAGGGGTCAGGGTTGATTC5’
969
55
12
F-3’GCATAATTAAACTTTACTTC5’
  
  
  R-3’AGAATATTGAGGCGCCATTG5’93755

Computational assessment of missense mutations

For prediction of pathogenic characteristics of all non-synonymous mtDNA changes two homology based programs PolyPhen-2 (Polymorphism Phenotyping) and SIFT (Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant) were used. PolyPhen structurally analyzes an amino acid polymorphism and predicts whether that amino acid change is likely to be deleterious to protein function [17-19]. Polyphen-2 is more advanced version of the earlier version PolyPhen [20]. The prediction is based on the position-specific independent counts (PSIC) score derived from multiple sequence alignments of observations in case of functional domain of protein and predicted hydrophobic and transmembrane (PHAT) matrix element difference in case of transmembrane region of protein. PolyPhen scores of above 0.85 indicate the polymorphism is probably damaging to protein function. Scores of above 0.15 are possibly damaging, and scores of less than 0.15 are classified as benign. SIFT is a sequence homology-based tool that sorts intolerant from tolerant amino acid substitutions and predicts whether an amino acid substitution in a protein will have a phenotypic effect [21-23]. SIFT is based on the premise that protein evolution is correlated with protein function. Positions important for function should be conserved in an alignment of the protein family, whereas unimportant positions should appear diverse in an alignment. Positions with normalized probabilities less than 0.05 are predicted to be deleterious and, those greater than or equal to 0.05 are predicted to be tolerated.

Haplogroup and phylogenetic analysis

To check the fidelity of our conclusion, the evolutionary information and the significance of mutations should be known. For haplogroups (Hg) analysis we have carefully chosen two hundred healthy individual samples from same area for comparison analysis and these were also treated as controls. For all control samples, sequences of the control region were determined from position 16024 to 00300, using the ABI Prism Dye Terminator cycle-sequencing protocols developed by Applied Biosystems (Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, CA), to provide an initial presumed Hg assignment and cases were haplogrouped by complete coding region sequences. The C-track length variation at positions 16182 and 16183 in HVS-I and the indels at positions 00309 and 00315 in HVS-II were excluded from further analyses. Hg assignment was then confirmed, based on control and coding region Hg defining polymorphisms determined by means of direct sequencing. The NETWORK 4.5.1.6 program was run for placing all the mutations of control samples in their respective phylogenetic tree using the protocol as described at the Fluxus Engineering Website. The matrilineal lineages of the case were drawn manually in the reduced median network of control samples, to create the topology map we have applied the reduced median algorithm (r=1), followed by the median-joining algorithm (epsilon=2).

Principal component analysis

To minimize errors both strands were double-sequenced. Principal component analysis (PCA) of mtDNA was performed. For this experiment we compiled our data of mitochondrial haplogroups. Controls samples of five different populations were taken from published data defining Indian lineage for comparative analysis representing each sector of India i.e., Northern India, North-Western India, Western India, Eastern India, and Southern India. The MVSP software package (Kovach WL, Services KC. MVSP - A multi-variate statistical package for Windows ver 3.13m. 2004) was used to identify the principal components (PCs) of mitochondrial variations that lead to form a haplogroup for every individual. To express the relative importance of top two eigenvectors in the resulting PCA plot, two axes were scaled by a factor equal to the square root of the corresponding eigen value. This experiment was repeated to confirm the outcomes.

Results

Sequence variation in Complex I genes

DNA sequencing of Complex I genes revealed a total 84 nucleotide variation in patients (Table 3) and 29 variations in controls (Table 4). Of the 84 nucleotide variations in patients, 18 (21.42%) were non synonymous (Table 5), 52 (61.90%) were synonymous, 9 (10.71%) variations were in RNA genes and 3 (3.57%) were in non-coding region. Of 84 nucleotide variations in KC patients; five variations (3918G>A, 5348C>T, 12007G>A, 12372G>A and 12561G>A) were also present in controls. Out of 29 nucleotide variations found in controls 5 were non-synonymous. Maximum nucleotide variations were in ND5 (n=28) followed by ND4 (n=15); ND2 (n=13); ND3 (n=7); ND1 (n=3); ND4L (n=3), tRNAs (n=9), rRNAs (n=2) and 3 in non-coding regions.
Table 3

Complex 1variations observed in KC patients.

Sample numberGenomic positionBase changeGene/ locationAmino acid positionCodon changeAmino acid changeChange in proteinTotal no. of patients with nt changesGeneBank accession number if novel
1
2706
G>A
16rRNA
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
2887
T>C
16rRNA
 
 
 
 
1
 
3
3918
G>A
ND1
204
GAG>GAA
Glu>Glu
p.E204E
1
 
4
3921
T>C
ND1
205
TCT>TCT
Ser>Ser
p.S205S
1
 
5
4216
T>C
ND1
304
TAT>CAT
Tyr>His
p.Y304H
3
 
6
4454
T>C
tRNA met
 
 
 
 
1
 
7
4682
C>A
ND2
71
CTA>ATA
Leu>Ile
p.L71I
1
Yes
8
4688
T>C
ND2
73
GCT>GCC
Ala>Ala
p.A73A
1
 
9
4696
T>C
ND2
76
TTC>TCC
Phe>Ser
p.F76S
1
Yes
10
4715
A>G
ND2
100
ATG>ATA
Met>Met
p.M100M
1
 
11
4833
A>G
ND2
122
ACC>GCC
Thr>Ala
p.T122A
1
 
12
4917
A>G
ND2
150
AAC>GAC
Asn>Asp
p.N150D
1
 
13
5046
G>A
ND2
193
GTT>ATT
Val>Ile
p.V193I
1
 
14
5108
T>C
ND2
213
ACT>ACC
Thr>Thr
p.T213T
1
 
15
5300
T>T, Del CA
ND2
277
Frame shift
p.Ile277His fs X11
p.I287X
1
Yes
16
5348
C>T
ND2
293
TAT>TAC
Tyr>Tyr
p.Y293Y
1
 
17
5351
A>G
ND2
294
TTA>TTG
Leu>Leu
p.L294L
1
 
18
5360
C>T
ND2
297
ATC>ATT
Ile>Ile
p.I297I
1
 
19
5460
G>A
ND2
331
GCC>ACC
Ala>Thr
p.A331T
1
 
20
5580
C>T
NC
 
 
 
 
20
 
21
5585
G>A
NC
 
 
 
 
20
 
22
5601
C>T
tRNA Ala
 
 
 
 
2
 
23
5790
C>A
OL
 
 
 
 
1
 
24
5899
InsC
NC
 
 
 
 
1
Yes
25
5900
InsC
NC
 
 
 
 
 
Yes
26
10084
T>C
ND3
9
ATC>ACC
Ile>Thr
p.I9T
1
 
27
10142
C>T
ND3
18
AAC>AAT
Asn>Asn
p.N18N
1
 
28
10253
T>C
ND3
65
TTT>TTC
Phe>Phe
p.F65F
1
 
29
10304
T>C
ND3
82
ACT>ACC
Thr>Thr
p.T82T
1
Yes
30
10373
G>A
ND3
105
GAG>GAA
Glu>Glu
p.E105E
1
 
31
10398
G-A
ND3
114
GCC-ACC
Ala>Thr
p. A 114 T
8
 
32
10400
C-T
ND3
114
GCC-GCT
Ala-Ala
p. A114 A
9
 
33
10411
A>G
tRNA Arg
 
 
 
 
 
 
34
10463
T>C
tRNA Arg
 
 
 
 
1
 
35
10685
G>A
ND4L
72
 
Ala>Ala
p.A72A
1
 
36
10631
C>T
ND4L
54
 
Leu>Leu
p.L54L
1
 
38
10819
A>G
ND4
20
CTG>CTA
Lys-Lys
p.K20K
20
 
39
10873
C-T
ND 4
38
CCC-CCT
Pro-Pro
P38P
20
 
40
10951
C>T
ND4
64
CCC>CCT
Pro>Pro
p.P64P
1
Yes
41
11017
C-T
ND 4
86
AGC-AGT
Ser-Ser
S86S
20
 
42
11251
A>G
ND4
164
CTA>CTG
Leu>Leu
p.L164L
1
 
43
11273
G>C, Del G
ND4
172
Frame shift
p.gly172AlafsX2
p.L174X
1
Yes
44
11437
T>C
ND4
226
GCT>GCC
Ala>Ala
p.A226A
1
 
45
11467
A>G
ND4
236
TTA>TTG
Leu>Leu
p.L236L
3
 
46
11673
C>T
ND4
305
ACC>ACT
Thr>Thr
p.T305T
1
 
47
11722
C>T
ND4
321
CTC>CTT
Leu>leu
p.L305L
20
 
48
11902
G>C
ND4
381
GTG>GTC
Val>Val
p.V381V
1
 
49
11914
G>A
ND4
385
ACG>ACA
Thr>Thr
p.T385T
1
 
50
11947
A>G
ND4
396
ACA>ACG
Thr>Thr
p.T396T
1
 
51
11969
G>A
ND4
404
GCC>ACC
Ala>thr
p.A404T
3
 
52
12007
G>A
ND 4
416
TGG-TGA
Tryp-Tryp
p. W416 W
9
 
53
12234
G>A
tRNA Ser
 
 
 
 
1
 
54
12236
G>A
tRNA Ser
 
 
 
 
1
 
55
12330
A>G
tRNA Ser
 
 
 
 
3
Yes
56
12308
A>G
tRNA Leu
 
 
 
 
5
 
37
12330
A>G
tRNA Leu
 
 
 
 
 
 
57
12361
A>G
ND5
9
ACC>AAA
Thr>Ala
p.T9A
1
 
58
12372
G>A
ND5
12
CTG>CTA
Leu>Leu
p.L12L
5
 
59
12414
T>C
ND5
26
CCT>CCC
Pro>Pro
p.P26P
1
 
60
12426
C>A
ND5
30
AAC>AAA
Asp>Lys
p.D30L
1
 
61
12561
G>A
ND5
75
CAG>CAA
Gln>Gln
p.Q75Q
1
 
62
12633
C>A
ND5
99
TCC>TCA
Ser>Ser
p.S99S
2
 
63
12624
T>C
ND5
96
GTT>GTC
Val>Val
p.V96V
1
 
64
12672
A>G
ND5
112
CCA>CCG
Pro>Pro
p.P112P
2
 
65
12654
A>G
ND5
106
TGA>TGG
Trp>Trp
p.W106W
1
Yes
66
12705
T-C
ND5
123
ATT-ATC
Ile-Ile
p. I 123 I
11
 
67
12850
G-A
ND 5
172
GTC-ATC
Val –Ile
p. I 172 V
20
 
68
12879
G>C
ND5
181
GGT>GGC
Gly>Gly
P.G181G
1
 
69
13065
C>T
ND5
243
GTC>CTT
Val>Val
p.V243V
1
 
70
13104
A>G
ND5
256
GGA>GGG
Gly>Gly
p.G256G
1
 
71
13174
T>C
ND5
280
TTA>CTA
Leu>Leu
p.L280L
1
 
72
13263
A>G
ND5
309
CAA>CAG
Gln>Gln
p.Q309Q
1
 
73
13368
G>A
ND5
344
GGG>GGA
Gly>Gly
p.G344G
2
Yes
74
13434
A>G
ND5
367
ATA>ATG
Met>Met
p.M366M
2
 
75
13488
T>C
ND5
384
GGT>GGC
Gly>Gly
p.G384G
1
 
76
13500
T>C
ND5
388
GGT>GGC
Pro>Pro
p.P388P
3
 
77
13563
A>G
ND5
409
CTA>CTG
Leu>Leu
P.L409L
4
 
78
13557
A>G
ND5
407
TGA>TGG
Trp>Trp
p.W407W
1
Yes
79
13617
T>G
ND5
427
ATT>ATC
Ile>Ile
p.I427I
2
 
80
13637
A>G
ND5
434
CAA>CAG
Glu>Arg
p.Q434R
2
 
81
13768
T>C
ND5
478
TTC>ATC
Phe>Ile
p.F479I
3
 
82
13914
C>A
ND5
526
CTC>CTA
Leu>Leu
p.L526L
3
 
83
14058
C>T
ND5
574
TCC>TCT
Ser>Ser
p.S574S
1
 
8414070A>GND5578TCA>TCGSer>Serp.S578S1 

Abbreviations: KC represents Keratoconus; nt- Nucleotides, A – Adenine; T – Thymine; G- Guanine; C- Cytosine; ND1 represents NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1, ND2 represents NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2; ND3- NADH dehydrogenase subunit 3; ND4- NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4; ND4L- NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4L; ND5- NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5.

Table 4

Complex 1 variations observed in controls.

Sample numberGenomic positionBase changeLocusAmino acid positionCodon changeAmino acid changeChange in protein
1
3591
G>A
ND1
95
CTG>CTA
Thr>Thr
p.T95T
2
3915
G>A
ND1
203
GGG>GGA
Gly>Gly
p.G203G
3
3918
G>A
ND1
204
GAG>GAA
Glu>Glu
p.E204E
4
3933
A>G
ND1
209
TCA>TCG
Ser>Ser
p.S209S
5
3970
C>T
ND1
222
CTA>TTA
Leu>Leu
p.L222L
6
3996
C>T
ND1
230
AAC>AAT
Asn>Asn
p.N230N
7
4093
A>G
ND1
263
ACC>GCC
Thr>Ala
p.T263A
8
4029
C>A
ND1
241
ATC>ATA
Ile>Ile
p.I241I
9
4793
A>G
ND2
108
ATA>ATG
Met>Met
p.M108M
10
4852
T>A
ND2
128
CTG>CAG
Leu>Gln
p.L128Q
11
5186
A>T
ND2
239
TGA>TGT
Trp>Cys
p.W239C
12
5348
C>T
ND2
293
TAC>TAT
Tyr>Tyr
p.Y293Y
13
10310
G>A
ND3
84
CTG>CTA
Thr>Thr
p.T84T
14
11467
A>G
ND4
236
TTA>TTG
Leu>Leu
p.L236L
15
11914
G>A
ND4
385
ACG>ACA
Thr>Thr
p.T385T
16
12007
G>A
ND4
416
TGG>TGA
Trp>Trp
p.W416W
17
12073
C>T
ND4
438
TTC>TTT
Phe>Phe
p.F438F
18
12107
C>T
ND4
449
CTC>CTT
Thr>Thr
p.T449T
19
12133
C>T
ND4
458
TCC>TCT
Ser>Ser
p.S458S
20
13299
A>G
ND5
321
CAA>CAG
Gln>Gln
p.Q321Q
21
12372
G>A
ND5
12
CTG>CTA
Tyr>Tyr
p.T12T
22
12373
A>G
ND5
13
ACT>GCT
Thr>Ala
p.T13A
23
12406
G>A
ND5
24
GTT>ATT
Val>Ile
p.V24I
24
12486
C>T
ND5
50
CCC>CCT
Pro>Pro
p.P50P
25
12498
C>T
ND5
54
TTC>TTT
Phe>Phe
p.F54F
26
12561
G>A
ND5
75
CAG>CAA
Gln>Gln
p.Q75Q
27
13731
A>G
ND5
465
GGA>GGG
Gly>Gly
p.G465G
28
13806
C>T
ND5
490
GCC>GCT
Ala>Ala
p.A490A
2914058C>TND5574TCC>TCTSer>Serp.S574S

Abbreviations: A – Adenine; T – Thymine; G- Guanine; C- Cytosine; ND1 represents NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1, ND2 represents NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2;ND3- NADH dehydrogenase subunit 3; ND4-NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4; ND5- NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5.

Table 5

Mitochondrial DNA sequence variations (non-synonymous) detected in KC patients.

Sample numberNucleotide substitutionAmino acid changeChange in proteinSIFT scoreSIFT predictionPolyphen score
2
4216T>C
Tyr>His
p.Y304H
0.82
Tolerant
0.008
3
4917 A>G
Asn>Asp
p.N150D
0.14
Tolerant
0.006
4
5046 G>A
Val>Ile
p.V193I
0.61
Tolerant
0.000
5
4833 A>G
Thr>Ala
p.T122A
0.10
Tolerant
0.135
6
4682 C>A
Leu>Ile
p.L71I
0.01
Pathogenic
0.001
7
4696 T>C
Phe>Ser
p.F76S
0.14
Tolerant
0.000
8
5300T>T
p.Ile277His fs X11
p.I287X
 
 
 
9
5460 G>A
Ala>Thr
p.A331T
0.37
Tolerant
0.000
10
10084T>C
Ile>Thr
p.I9T
0.49
Tolerant
0.000
11
10398 G-A
Ala>Thr
p. A 114 T
1.00
Tolerant
0.000
12
11273G>C
p.gly172AlafsX2
p.L174X
 
 
 
13
11969G>A
Ala>Thr
p.A404T
0.13
Tolerant
0.000
14
12361A>G
Thr>Ala
p.T9A
0.00
Pathogenic
Not available
15
12426C>A
Asn>Lys
p.N30L
0.21
Tolerant
0.899
16
12850G>A
Val >Ile
p. I172V
1.00
Tolerant
0.422
17
13637A>G
Glu>Arg
p.Q434R
0.41
Tolerant
0.008
1813768T>CPhe>Ilep.F478I0.17Tolerant0.005
Abbreviations: KC represents Keratoconus; nt- Nucleotides, A – Adenine; T – Thymine; G- Guanine; C- Cytosine; ND1 represents NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1, ND2 represents NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2; ND3- NADH dehydrogenase subunit 3; ND4- NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4; ND4L- NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4L; ND5- NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5. Abbreviations: A – Adenine; T – Thymine; G- Guanine; C- Cytosine; ND1 represents NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1, ND2 represents NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2;ND3- NADH dehydrogenase subunit 3; ND4-NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4; ND5- NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5. Of 84 variations, 2 variations were frame-shift (11273G>A, 5300T>T). In one patient (KC 16) a single base deletion of guanine was observed at mtDNA position 11273. This caused a frame shift mutation after codon 172 (Gly>Ala) and introduced a stop codon at position 174 which resulted in a 173 amino acids truncated protein.This variation was homoplasmic (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Mt DNA sequence chromatogram of ND4 gene. A: The reference sequence derived from control is shown. B: Sequence derived from keratoconus patient K16 shows a deletion of G at11273, which cause a codon change GGC>GCT and p.gly172AlafsX2 (p.L174X) mutation.

Mt DNA sequence chromatogram of ND4 gene. A: The reference sequence derived from control is shown. B: Sequence derived from keratoconus patient K16 shows a deletion of G at11273, which cause a codon change GGC>GCT and p.gly172AlafsX2 (p.L174X) mutation. In patient KC 2, we found a 2 base pair (CA) deletion at genomic position 5300 and 5301. This frame shift mutation altered the amino acid reading frame in ND2 protein at position 277. This CA deletion produced a truncated protein of 287 amino acids (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Mt DNA sequence chromatogram of ND2 CA Deletion. A: The reference sequence derived from control is shown. B: Sequence derived from keratoconus patient K2 shows two base deletion CA at 5300, which causes a codon change ATC>ATT and p.Ile277His fsX11(p.I287X) mutation.

Mt DNA sequence chromatogram of ND2 CA Deletion. A: The reference sequence derived from control is shown. B: Sequence derived from keratoconus patient K2 shows two base deletion CA at 5300, which causes a codon change ATC>ATT and p.Ile277His fsX11(p.I287X) mutation.

In silico analysis

SIFT analysis revealed two pathogenic changes (p.L71I and p.T9A) and PolyPhen revealed two pathogenic changes (p.N30L and p.I172V). The polyphen score of p.T9A was not available (no result for this mutation was available through PolyPhen; Table 5).

Principle component analysis

The tight cluster in Principal component Analysis (PCA) plot comprises the north-western, western, and north Indian population whereas the southern Indian and eastern Indian population is caught in a loose cluster (Figure 3). The controls were taken from published data defining Indian lineage for PCA and Haplogroup Network. We have treated the patients as a sub group of individuals having genetic structure different from normal Indians e.g., population. The inferences from PCA plot strongly supports our motive behind the planning of experiment, interestingly the patient population has not shown any relevant genetic affinity with other macropopulations of India.
Figure 3

PCA plot of keratoconus patients with Indian population.

PCA plot of keratoconus patients with Indian population.

Discussion

In this study we analyzed mitochondrial complex 1 gene in 20 keratoconus patients (negative for VSX1 mutations [13]) and 20 unrelated healthy controls. The cornea, being an avascular structure and the first in line of ultraviolet (UV) radiation, is very susceptible to UV induced oxidative damage. Previous studies [10,11] suggested the role of oxidative stress in corneal disorders and congenital glaucoma [12]. Since the complex 1 NADH group of genes are most frequently associated with increased ROS production and oxidative stress [12,24], in this pilot study we analyzed mitochondrial complex I gene for sequence variations. Most of the mutations were found in ND5 (n=28) followed by ND4 (15) and then ND2 (13). The frequent variations in ND5 are in accordance with previous reports that mutations in ND5 gene of complex 1 play an important role in mitochondrial diseases [25]. In this study we report two novel frame shift mutations. Patient (KC 2) harbored a two base deletion (CA) which caused a frameshift and introduced a stop codon at position 287 in protein (normal ND2 protein is 347 amino acids long). The truncated protein cannot substitute the wild type ND2 protein as frameshift altered the reading frame of ND2. Sequence variations in this gene are associated with several diseases e.g., Leigh syndrome, breast cancer, myocardial infarction, Parkinson disease, and primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) [12,26-29]. Patient (KC 16) harbored a single base deletion which resulted in a frame shift mutation after codon 172 (Gly>Ala) and introduced a stop codon at position 174 in protein and produced a truncated protein of 173 amino acids (wild type ND4 protein is 459 amino acids long). Studies have documented that G10398A is associated with elevated ROS production due to altered complex 1 function [29-32]. Role of this allele G10398A has been implicated in diseases like congenital glaucoma, Parkinson, Type-2 diabetes, and in pre-term births [12,29-33]. The G10398A variation though associated with high ROS levels was present significantly higher in cases as compared to controls however this is present in 43% Indian population. The 4216T>C variation considered as secondary or intermediate LHON-Leber’s Hereditary optic neuropathy mutation was also present in 3 patients. However these patients had no features of LHON.

Evolutionary insight of Mt complex I sequence variations

The genetic diversity in India is very complex. Several mutations from even control regions have been classified into the associative agent for various diseases [34]. The degree of haplotype sharing between populations is to investigate the combined frequency of the shared haplotypes in two population groups. Thus, among the northern and the southern population groups the combined frequency of the haplotypes present also in the other group is significantly lower than that which we observed in the case of random groups. This is not surprising because West Eurasian-specific mtDNA haplogroups are rather frequent in northwest India [35]. Because the Indo-European and the Dravidic speakers of India are largely concentrated to the northern and southern parts of the subcontinent, respectively, the differences arising from geographic division of the Indian populations also correspond to different linguistic groupings [36]. In this study, we found that all the mutations were apparently North-Indian specific with some novel mutations. The sequencing of Complex 1 revealed 84 mutations, of which 14, including 2 frame shift mutations and 4 non-synonymous mutations, were novel and exclusively observed in KC patients. Interestingly, most of the patients and their maternal relatives were clustered under the haplogroups (T, C4a2a, R2’TJ, M21’Q1a, M12’G2a2a, M8’CZ, M7a2a, U5b1, U1a3) which are present as negligible frequency in normal Indian population, whereas only few patients were found to be a part of the haplogroups whose origin is contentious i.e., U7 (Indo-European), R2 and R31. We have found three patients who fall under Indian haplogroups (M4, M4’63, R31a1) but they also carry the same sets of novel synonymous and non-synonymous mutations i.e., 4769, 4985, 5580, and 12850 (Figure 4). We have found some novel mutations in addition to each individual’s lineages and they are different from each other. This finding suggests the positive/causative role of different combinations of the mitochondrial coding mutations in this disease, as the normal population, completely lack these mutations.
Figure 4

Network tree of the keratoconus patients and their comparison with other normal population.

Network tree of the keratoconus patients and their comparison with other normal population. The patients harbored some novel mutations at the different sites in mitochondria i.e., 4769, 4985, 5580, and 12850. These variants have never been reported in any of the population studies whereas they were present in every patient. Nevertheless, it is impossible from the evolutionary point of view that these sets of mutations in the individuals from different haplogroup. By keeping in mind about mutation rates in the coding region and its natural selection [37], we propose that these variants could theoretically influence the patient’s phenotype. However, the variants present in coding regions of mitochondrial gene are not conserved in course of evolution. The patients were apparently homoplasmic (only one type of mtDNA was present). To determine whether the maternal inherited gene pool of keratoconus patients is truly closer to any major populations in India, we have constructed the haplogroup frequency based PCA plot for mtDNA (Figure 3). Indeed, this analysis shows ambiguously that the three Indian populations clusters tightly among themselves viz. North, North West and West populations and two populations are to be found in a loose cluster viz South Indian and East Indian, whereas the keratoconus population matches with none of them in the mtDNA PCA plots. However the genetic data indicates that the keratoconus patients comprise several different haplotypes, if they are compared to normal populations around them. Most of the patients are in the clades which are nonspecific to Indian lineages. This information suggests that keratoconus patients are among those who are recent migrants into India and some genes in mitochondria have acquired mutations which are not filtered by purifying selection. Our results explain that the patients are genetically unrelated to each other due to the present maternal lineages which were diversified in the history of evolution. This fact suggests that the polymorphisms which are playing pivotal roles in causing the disease are recently accumulated in the mitochondrial coding regions of an individual patient. We have found that mutations specifically found in KC patients can affect transcription, translation or have synergistic effect with other variants in causing the disease. It has been reported many times about synergistic effect of different mutations in mitochondria that can cause many severe diseases [38]. Nevertheless, it is impossible from the evolutionary point of view these sets of mutations to occur in the normal individual from different haplogroups. By keeping in mind about mutation rates in the coding region and its natural selection, we propose that these variants could theoretically influence the patient’s disease. Non-synonymous mutations and frame shift mutations adversely affect C1 synergetics resulting in increase ROS production and mitochondrial dysfunction. KC corneas are unable to process ROS due to depleted or low ATP levels and increased ROS production and thereby undergo oxidative damage. These corneas have increased levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), which can results in altered protein function leading to cascade of events, including apoptosis that can damage the corneal tissues. Thus this pilot study highlights the role of sequence variation in mitochondrial complex I gene in keratoconus patients. Such cases with elevated free radicals levels and oxidative damage to cornea may benefit immensely by antioxidant therapy.

Conclusions

Keratoconus corneas are known to suffer from oxidative damage. It is important to analyze the cause of raised ROS levels. Hence in this study we analyzed mitochondrial complex I genes, as sequence variations in this gene complex are associated with depleted ATP and increased ROS levels. We found a higher number of non-synonymous sequence variations in KC patients in comparison to controls.
  38 in total

Review 1.  The genetics of keratoconus.

Authors:  M Edwards; C N McGhee; S Dean
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.207

2.  Dominantly inherited keratoconus.

Authors:  H F Falls; A W Allen
Journal:  J Genet Hum       Date:  1969-10

3.  Mitochondrial genome polymorphisms associated with type-2 diabetes or obesity.

Authors:  Li-Jun Guo; Yoshiharu Oshida; Noriyuki Fuku; Takeshi Takeyasu; Yasunori Fujita; Miyuki Kurata; Yuzo Sato; Masafumi Ito; Masashi Tanaka
Journal:  Mitochondrion       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.160

4.  Oxidative stress and sperm mitochondrial DNA mutation in idiopathic oligoasthenozoospermic men.

Authors:  R Kumar; S Venkatesh; M Kumar; M Tanwar; M B Shasmsi; R Kumar; N P Gupta; R K Sharma; P Talwar; Rima Dada
Journal:  Indian J Biochem Biophys       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.918

5.  Human non-synonymous SNPs: server and survey.

Authors:  Vasily Ramensky; Peer Bork; Shamil Sunyaev
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Mitochondrial DNA analysis in primary congenital glaucoma.

Authors:  Mukesh Tanwar; Tanuj Dada; Ramanjit Sihota; Rima Dada
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.367

Review 7.  Oxidative stress, mitochondrial DNA mutation, and impairment of antioxidant enzymes in aging.

Authors:  Yau-Huei Wei; Hsin-Chen Lee
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2002-10

8.  Association of a 5178C-->A (Leu237Met) polymorphism in the mitochondrial DNA with a low prevalence of myocardial infarction in Japanese individuals.

Authors:  Katsumasa Takagi; Yoshiji Yamada; Jian-Sheng Gong; Takahito Sone; Mitsuhiro Yokota; Masashi Tanaka
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.162

9.  Development of keratoconus after contact lens wear. Patient characteristics.

Authors:  M S Macsai; G A Varley; J H Krachmer
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-04

10.  Generation of superoxide anion by the NADH dehydrogenase of bovine heart mitochondria.

Authors:  J F Turrens; A Boveris
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1980-11-01       Impact factor: 3.857

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Keratoconus: an inflammatory disorder?

Authors:  V Galvis; T Sherwin; A Tello; J Merayo; R Barrera; A Acera
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Mitochondrial Profile and Responses to TGF-β Ligands in Keratoconus.

Authors:  Akhee Sarker-Nag; Audrey E K Hutcheon; Dimitrios Karamichos
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 2.424

3.  The Genetics of Keratoconus: A Review.

Authors:  Joshua Wheeler; Michael A Hauser; Natalie A Afshari; R Rand Allingham; Yutao Liu
Journal:  Reprod Syst Sex Disord       Date:  2012-06-03

4.  Mitochondrial polymorphism A10398G and Haplogroup I are associated with Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy.

Authors:  Yi-Ju Li; Mollie A Minear; Xuejun Qin; Jacqueline Rimmler; Michael A Hauser; R Rand Allingham; Robert P Igo; Jonathan H Lass; Sudha K Iyengar; Gordon K Klintworth; Natalie A Afshari; Simon G Gregory
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Whole mitochondrial genome analysis in Chinese patients with keratoconus.

Authors:  Liyan Xu; Kaili Yang; Qi Fan; Dongqing Zhao; Chenjiu Pang; Shengwei Ren
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.367

6.  Interleukin 1 beta promoter polymorphism is associated with keratoconus in a Japanese population.

Authors:  Takenori Mikami; Akira Meguro; Takeshi Teshigawara; Masaki Takeuchi; Riyo Uemoto; Tatsukata Kawagoe; Eiichi Nomura; Yuri Asukata; Misaki Ishioka; Miki Iwasaki; Kazumi Fukagawa; Kenji Konomi; Jun Shimazaki; Teruo Nishida; Nobuhisa Mizuki
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.367

7.  Investigation of VSX1 sequence variants in South Indian patients with sporadic cases of keratoconus.

Authors:  Anshuman Verma; Manoranjan Das; Muthiah Srinivasan; Namperumalsamy V Prajna; Periasamy Sundaresan
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-03-18

8.  Mitochondrial DNA variants mediate energy production and expression levels for CFH, C3 and EFEMP1 genes: implications for age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  M Cristina Kenney; Marilyn Chwa; Shari R Atilano; Janelle M Pavlis; Payam Falatoonzadeh; Claudio Ramirez; Deepika Malik; Tiffany Hsu; Grace Woo; Kyaw Soe; Anthony B Nesburn; David S Boyer; Baruch D Kuppermann; S Michal Jazwinski; Michael V Miceli; Douglas C Wallace; Nitin Udar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Pathogenesis of Keratoconus: The intriguing therapeutic potential of Prolactin-inducible protein.

Authors:  Rabab Sharif; Sashia Bak-Nielsen; Jesper Hjortdal; Dimitrios Karamichos
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 19.704

10.  Lack of association between polymorphisms of the DNA base excision repair genes MUTYH and hOGG1 and keratoconus in a Polish subpopulation.

Authors:  Ewelina Synowiec; Katarzyna A Wójcik; Anna Czubatka; Piotr Polakowski; Justyna Izdebska; Jerzy Szaflik; Janusz Błasiak; Jacek P Szaflik
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.