Literature DB >> 21691342

A prospective study to compare a symptom-based reflux disease questionnaire to 48-h wireless pH monitoring for the identification of gastroesophageal reflux (revised 2-26-11).

Brian E Lacy1, Robert Chehade, Michael D Crowell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GerdQ) is a validated questionnaire that identifies patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the association between GerdQ scores and 48-h wireless pH recording in patients studied either on or off acid suppression.
METHODS: Demographics, symptoms, acid suppressant use, and GerdQ scores were obtained from consecutive patients referred for wireless pH testing; 48-h pH data and endoscopic findings were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression models controlling for age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) were used to evaluate the association between GerdQ scores, acid reflux, and symptom association probability (SAP) scores.
RESULTS: Wireless pH-metry was completed in 180 patients off proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (mean (s.d.) age, 50 (14) years; BMI, 28.08 (6.87) kg/m(2)) and 178 patients on PPI (mean (s.d.) age, 52 (14) years; BMI, 29.00 (6.90) kg/m(2)). Abnormal acid exposure was noted in 26% of patients on and 61% off PPI therapy. The odds of an abnormal study were 5.04 (95% confidence interval (CI), 3.14-8.11) times greater in patients studied off PPI therapy compared with patients studied on PPI therapy. The odds ratio of the SAP being >95% was 5.69 (95% CI, 3.36-9.64; P<0.001) for patients studied off PPI therapy compared with on PPI therapy. The mean (s.d.) GerdQ score was 7.48 (4.53) in patients on PPI therapy and 9.11 (1.25) in patients off PPI therapy (P<0.001). The odds of having an abnormal pH study was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.99-1.16; P=0.07) in patients studied off PPI therapy and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.92-1.08; P=0.94) in patients on PPI therapy for each point increase on the GerdQ. The odds of an abnormal SAP 95% in patients studied off PPI therapy was 1.18 (95% CI, 1.09-1.28; P<0.001) and 1.10 (95% CI, 1.01-1.21; P<0.03) in patients studied on PPI therapy for each point increase in the GerdQ score.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher GerdQ scores were predictive of an abnormal pH study in patients studied off PPI therapy. Compared with wireless pH capsule monitoring, the GerdQ has only modest sensitivity and specificity at diagnosing acid reflux and thus cannot be recommended as a screening tool for GERD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21691342     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2011.180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  17 in total

1.  A budget impact analysis of a magnetic sphincter augmentation device for the treatment of medication-refractory mechanical gastroesophageal reflux disease: a United States payer perspective.

Authors:  John Pandolfino; John Lipham; Amarpreet Chawla; Nicole Ferko; Andrew Hogan; Rana A Qadeer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Many patients continue using proton pump inhibitors after negative results from tests for reflux disease.

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; Jami Rothe; Angela J Fought; Anita Fareeduddin; Erin Toto; Lubomyr Boris; Peter J Kahrilas; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Early referral for 24-h esophageal pH monitoring may prevent unnecessary treatment with acid-reducing medications.

Authors:  David A Kleiman; Matthew J Sporn; Toni Beninato; Yasmin Metz; Carl Crawford; Thomas J Fahey; Rasa Zarnegar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Ambulatory reflux monitoring in GERD--which test should be performed and should therapy be stopped?

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-04

Review 5.  Types and applications of cough-related questionnaires.

Authors:  Zhijing Wang; Miao Wang; Siwan Wen; Li Yu; Xianghuai Xu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Epidemiology of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas M Runge; Julian A Abrams; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.806

7.  Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease Increases the Risk of Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms.

Authors:  Yuan He; Zhi-Jun Duan; Cheng-Fang Wang; Yu-Shan Wei; Ming-Xu Cai
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.168

8.  Early referral for esophageal pH monitoring is more cost-effective than prolonged empiric trials of proton-pump inhibitors for suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  David A Kleiman; Toni Beninato; Brian P Bosworth; Laurent Brunaud; Thomas Ciecierega; Carl V Crawford; Brian G Turner; Thomas J Fahey; Rasa Zarnegar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Prevalence of symptoms of gastroesopahgeal reflux in a cohort of Saudi Arabians: a study of 1265 subjects.

Authors:  Majid A Almadi; Maitha A Almousa; Amani F Althwainy; Afnan M Altamimi; Hala O Alamoudi; Hiba S Alshamrani; Othman R Alharbi; Nahla A Azzam; Nazia Sadaf; Abdulrahman M Aljebreen
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.485

Review 10.  Diagnostic yield of ambulatory oesophageal studies on versus off proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daphne Ang; Qishi Zheng; Luming Shi; Jan Tack
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 4.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.