Literature DB >> 21691256

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic profiles of telmisartan after the oral microdose and therapeutic dose.

Ichiro Ieiri1, Chisa Nishimura, Kazuya Maeda, Tomohiro Sasaki, Miyuki Kimura, Takeshi Chiyoda, Tekeshi Hirota, Shin Irie, Hitoshi Shimizu, Takanori Noguchi, Kenji Yoshida, Yuichi Sugiyama.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we evaluated (a) the contribution of SLCO1B3 and UGT1A polymorphisms to the pharmacokinetics of telmisartan in two forms, a microdose (MD) and a therapeutic dose (TD); (b) linkage disequilibrium (LD) between UGT1A1 and UGT1A3; and (c) linearity in the pharmacokinetics of telmisartan between the two forms.
METHODS: Telmisartan was orally administered at MD condition (100 μg), and then at TD condition (80 mg) to 33 healthy volunteers whose genotypes were prescreened by DMET Plus. Plasma concentrations of telmisartan and its glucuronide were measured by LC-MS/MS, and population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed.
RESULTS: No obvious effect of SLCO1B3 polymorphisms (334T>G, 699G>A, and rs11045585) on the pharmacokinetics of telmisartan was observed. The strong LD between UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A3*4a, and between UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A3*2a were observed. After both MD and TD administration, the mean area under the curve0-24 (±standard deviation) of telmisartan was significantly lower and higher in individuals with the UGT1A3*2a (TD, 1701±970 ng hr/ml; MD, 978±537 pg hr/ml) and *4a variants (TD, 5340±1168; MD, 3145±1093), respectively, compared with those in individuals with UGT1A3*1/*1 (TD, 2969±1456; MD, 1669±726). These results were quantitatively confirmed by population pharmacokinetic analysis. Nonlinearity of the dose-exposure relationship was observed between the MD and TD.
CONCLUSION: The haplotypes of UGT1A3 significantly influenced pharmacokinetics of telmisartan and a strong LD between UGT1A1 genotype and UGT1A3 haplotype was observed. These findings are potentially of pharmacological and toxicological importance to the development and clinical use of drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21691256     DOI: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e3283489ce2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics        ISSN: 1744-6872            Impact factor:   2.089


  19 in total

1.  To Apply Microdosing or Not? Recommendations to Single Out Compounds with Non-Linear Pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Sieto Bosgra; Maria L H Vlaming; Wouter H J Vaes
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Significant effect of age on docetaxel pharmacokinetics in Japanese female breast cancer patients by using the population modeling approach.

Authors:  Haruka Onoue; Ikuko Yano; Atsuko Tanaka; Kotaro Itohara; Akiko Hanai; Hiroshi Ishiguro; Hideyuki Motohashi; Satohiro Masuda; Kazuo Matsubara
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Fimasartan: A New Angiotensin Receptor Blocker.

Authors:  Hae-Young Lee; Byung-Hee Oh
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of the Enterohepatic Recirculation of Fimasartan in Rats, Dogs, and Humans.

Authors:  Tae Hwan Kim; Soyoung Shin; Cornelia B Landersdorfer; Yong Ha Chi; Soo Heui Paik; Jayhyuk Myung; Rajbharan Yadav; Stefan Horkovics-Kovats; Jürgen B Bulitta; Beom Soo Shin
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 5.  Phase 0/microdosing approaches: time for mainstream application in drug development?

Authors:  Tal Burt; Graeme Young; Wooin Lee; Hiroyuki Kusuhara; Oliver Langer; Malcolm Rowland; Yuichi Sugiyama
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 6.  Predictive Value of Microdose Pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Merel van Nuland; Hilde Rosing; Alwin D R Huitema; Jos H Beijnen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Pharmacogenomics in early-phase clinical development.

Authors:  Tal Burt; Savita Dhillon
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 8.  Microdosing and drug development: past, present and future.

Authors:  Graham Lappin; Robert Noveck; Tal Burt
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.481

9.  Biphasic elimination of tenofovir diphosphate and nonlinear pharmacokinetics of zidovudine triphosphate in a microdosing study.

Authors:  Jianmeng Chen; Charles Flexner; Rosa G Liberman; Paul L Skipper; Nicolette A Louissaint; Steven R Tannenbaum; Craig W Hendrix; Edward J Fuchs
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.731

10.  Apple juice greatly reduces systemic exposure to atenolol.

Authors:  Hyewon Jeon; In-Jin Jang; SeungHwan Lee; Kyoichi Ohashi; Tsutomu Kotegawa; Ichiro Ieiri; Joo-Youn Cho; Seo Hyun Yoon; Sang-Goo Shin; Kyung-Sang Yu; Kyoung Soo Lim
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.