Literature DB >> 21691162

Predictors of cesarean delivery for periviable neonates.

Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds1, Corinne Fager, Sindhu Srinivas, Scott Lorch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test for racial or ethnic disparities or both in periviable cesarean delivery and describe sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with periviable cesarean delivery.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of state-level maternal and neonatal hospital discharge data linked to vital statistics data for deliveries occurring between 23 0/7 and 24 6/7 [corrected] weeks of gestation in California, Missouri, and Pennsylvania from 1995 to 2005 (N=8,290).
RESULTS: Approximately 79% of the population was aged 18-35 years, and almost half were nulliparous. Almost 20% of the women were African American, 36.4% were Hispanic, and 33.6% were white. Overall, 33.6% of periviable neonates were delivered by cesarean. In multivariable analyses adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, cesarean delivery did not differ among African American and Hispanic women compared with white women (odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.05; and OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.83-1.09, respectively). Women presenting with preterm labor were significantly less likely to undergo cesarean delivery (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.96), whereas women presenting with preterm premature rupture of membranes (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.14-1.45) or abruption (OR 2.43, 95% CI 2.09-2.81) were more likely to have cesarean deliveries. The strongest predictor of periviable cesarean delivery was pregnancy-induced hypertension (OR 15.6.4, 95% CI 12.3-19.7).
CONCLUSION: Unlike disparities observed at later gestational ages, cesarean delivery did not differ by race and ethnicity among this periviable cohort. Instead, medical indications such as pregnancy-induced hypertension, preterm premature rupture of membranes, or abruption were associated with a higher likelihood of cesarean delivery. Periviable deliveries represent a subset of deliveries, wherein race and ethnicity do not influence mode of delivery; the acuity of the clinical encounter dictates the course of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21691162     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821c4071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  The risk factors for failure of labor induction: a cohort study.

Authors:  Emilio Giugliano; Elisa Cagnazzo; Viviana Milillo; Massimo Moscarini; Fortunato Vesce; Donatella Caserta; Roberto Marci
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-12-01

Review 2.  Maternal, Labor, Delivery, and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with Placental Abruption: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Katheryne L Downes; Katherine L Grantz; Edmond D Shenassa
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Morbidity and mortality associated with mode of delivery for breech periviable deliveries.

Authors:  Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds; Fatima McKenzie; Michelle Macheras; Sindhu K Srinivas; Scott A Lorch
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Using simulation to assess the influence of race and insurer on shared decision making in periviable counseling.

Authors:  Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds; Fatima McKenzie; William F Fadel; Marianne S Matthias; Michelle P Salyers; Amber E Barnato; Richard M Frankel
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.929

5.  Hospitalization of rural and urban infants during the first year of life.

Authors:  Kristin N Ray; Scott A Lorch
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Regional and Racial-Ethnic Differences in Perinatal Interventions Among Periviable Births.

Authors:  Nansi S Boghossian; Marco Geraci; Erika M Edwards; Danielle E Y Ehret; George R Saade; Jeffrey D Horbar
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.