Cara L Booker1, Amanda Sacker. 1. Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK. cbooker@essex.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Unemployment has been negatively associated with psychological well-being. This study examines the effect of multiple unemployment spells, specifically whether people become sensitised or adapt to unemployment if they are previously employed or economically inactive. METHODS: Data come from waves 1-17 of the British Household Panel Survey. Psychological well-being was measured using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), and employment status was self-reported. Multilevel modelling was used to examine the effects of unemployment, overall and by previous employment status, on well-being. RESULTS: Without consideration of prior employment status, psychological well-being was poorer at each unemployment spell. Previously employed persons had significantly higher GHQ-12 scores at the first and second unemployment spells but not at the third spell (p(trend)<0.0001). Previously economically inactive persons had poorer psychological well-being at all unemployment spells, with significantly higher scores at the third spell than those at the first two spells (p(trend)=0.0004). Thus, those employed prior to all unemployment spells adapted, while those previously economically inactive became more sensitised with additional unemployment spells. Pre-study unemployment and average annual household income moderated the effects of unemployment; effects varied by previous employment status and unemployment spell number. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that initially employed people who experience repeated unemployment cope better psychologically if they are able to regain employment in between unemployment spells. Those who make several attempts to re-enter the labour market following economic inactivity have a more difficult time, becoming more distressed with each try. This has implications for people affected by welfare to work policies.
BACKGROUND: Unemployment has been negatively associated with psychological well-being. This study examines the effect of multiple unemployment spells, specifically whether people become sensitised or adapt to unemployment if they are previously employed or economically inactive. METHODS: Data come from waves 1-17 of the British Household Panel Survey. Psychological well-being was measured using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), and employment status was self-reported. Multilevel modelling was used to examine the effects of unemployment, overall and by previous employment status, on well-being. RESULTS: Without consideration of prior employment status, psychological well-being was poorer at each unemployment spell. Previously employed persons had significantly higher GHQ-12 scores at the first and second unemployment spells but not at the third spell (p(trend)<0.0001). Previously economically inactive persons had poorer psychological well-being at all unemployment spells, with significantly higher scores at the third spell than those at the first two spells (p(trend)=0.0004). Thus, those employed prior to all unemployment spells adapted, while those previously economically inactive became more sensitised with additional unemployment spells. Pre-study unemployment and average annual household income moderated the effects of unemployment; effects varied by previous employment status and unemployment spell number. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that initially employed people who experience repeated unemployment cope better psychologically if they are able to regain employment in between unemployment spells. Those who make several attempts to re-enter the labour market following economic inactivity have a more difficult time, becoming more distressed with each try. This has implications for people affected by welfare to work policies.
Authors: Fernando G Benavides; Xavier Duran; David Gimeno; Christophe Vanroelen; José Miguel Martínez Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2014-12-03 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Fredrik Norström; Pekka Virtanen; Anne Hammarström; Per E Gustafsson; Urban Janlert Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-12-22 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Laura Goodwin; Ilan Ben-Zion; Nicola T Fear; Matthew Hotopf; Stephen A Stansfeld; Simon Wessely Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Xiaoshi Yang; Lutian Yao; Hui Wu; Yang Wang; Li Liu; Jiana Wang; Lie Wang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-08-08 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Matilde Leonardi; Davide Guido; Rui Quintas; Fabiola Silvaggi; Erika Guastafierro; Andrea Martinuzzi; Somnath Chatterji; Seppo Koskinen; Beata Tobiasz-Adamczyk; Josep Maria Haro; Maria Cabello; Alberto Raggi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-04-11 Impact factor: 3.390