HYPOTHESIS: Extended surgical resection (ESR) may improve survival in patients with early-stage primary gallbladder cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of findings in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. SETTING: Academic research. PATIENTS: Individuals with potentially surgically curable gallbladder cancer (Tis, T1, or T2) who underwent a surgical procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival, number of lymph nodes (LNs) excised, and results of simple cholecystectomy vs ESR. RESULTS: We identified 3209 patients with early-stage gallbladder cancer (11.7% Tis, 30.1% T1, and 58.2% T2). On multivariate analysis, decreased survival was noted among patients older than 60 years (hazard ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-1.90), among patients with more advanced cancer (1.99; 1.46-2.70 for T1; 3.29; 2.45-4.43 for T2), and among patients with disease-positive LNs (1.65; 1.39-1.95 for regional; 2.58; 1.54-4.34 for distant) (P < .001 for all), while increased survival was observed among female patients (0.82; 0.70-0.96; P = .02) and among patients undergoing ESR (0.59; 0.45-0.78; P < .001). The survival advantage of ESR was seen only in patients with T2 lesions (0.49; 0.35-0.68; P < .001). Lymph node excision data were available for a subset of 2507 patients, of whom 68.2% had no LN excised, 28.2% had 1 to 4 LNs excised, and 3.6% had 5 or more LNs excised. On multivariate analysis, patients with 1 to 4 LNs excised had a survival benefit over those with no LN excised (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.46-0.66; P < .001), and patients with 5 or more LNs excised had a survival benefit over patients with 1 to 4 LNs removed (0.63; 0.40-0.96; P = .03). Lymph node excision improved survival in patients with T2 lesions (0.42; 0.33-0.53; P < .001 for patients with 1-4 LNs excised). CONCLUSION: Extended surgical resection, LN excision, or both may improve survival in certain patients with incidentally discovered gallbladder cancer.
HYPOTHESIS: Extended surgical resection (ESR) may improve survival in patients with early-stage primary gallbladder cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of findings in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. SETTING: Academic research. PATIENTS: Individuals with potentially surgically curable gallbladder cancer (Tis, T1, or T2) who underwent a surgical procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival, number of lymph nodes (LNs) excised, and results of simple cholecystectomy vs ESR. RESULTS: We identified 3209 patients with early-stage gallbladder cancer (11.7% Tis, 30.1% T1, and 58.2% T2). On multivariate analysis, decreased survival was noted among patients older than 60 years (hazard ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-1.90), among patients with more advanced cancer (1.99; 1.46-2.70 for T1; 3.29; 2.45-4.43 for T2), and among patients with disease-positive LNs (1.65; 1.39-1.95 for regional; 2.58; 1.54-4.34 for distant) (P < .001 for all), while increased survival was observed among female patients (0.82; 0.70-0.96; P = .02) and among patients undergoing ESR (0.59; 0.45-0.78; P < .001). The survival advantage of ESR was seen only in patients with T2 lesions (0.49; 0.35-0.68; P < .001). Lymph node excision data were available for a subset of 2507 patients, of whom 68.2% had no LN excised, 28.2% had 1 to 4 LNs excised, and 3.6% had 5 or more LNs excised. On multivariate analysis, patients with 1 to 4 LNs excised had a survival benefit over those with no LN excised (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.46-0.66; P < .001), and patients with 5 or more LNs excised had a survival benefit over patients with 1 to 4 LNs removed (0.63; 0.40-0.96; P = .03). Lymph node excision improved survival in patients with T2 lesions (0.42; 0.33-0.53; P < .001 for patients with 1-4 LNs excised). CONCLUSION: Extended surgical resection, LN excision, or both may improve survival in certain patients with incidentally discovered gallbladder cancer.
Authors: Juan C Roa; Oscar Tapia; Carlos Manterola; Miguel Villaseca; Pablo Guzman; Juan Carlos Araya; Pelin Bagci; Burcu Saka; Volkan Adsay Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Jimme K Wiggers; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Zachri Ovadia; Olivier R C Busch; Dirk J Gouma; Thomas M van Gulik Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2013-11-07 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Thomas A Aloia; Nicolas Járufe; Milind Javle; Shishir K Maithel; Juan C Roa; Volkan Adsay; Felipe J F Coimbra; William R Jarnagin Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Neda Amini; Yuhree Kim; Ana Wilson; Georgios Antonios Margonis; Cecilia G Ethun; George Poultsides; Thuy Tran; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Ryan C Fields; Bradley Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; Shishir K Maithel; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-05-05 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Danielle M Hari; J Harrison Howard; Anna M Leung; Connie G Chui; Myung-Shin Sim; Anton J Bilchik Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2012-09-26 Impact factor: 3.647