BACKGROUND: Single-institution case series suggest that elderly patients do as well as younger patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy. OBJECTIVES: To compare morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients older than 70 years vs younger patients. HYPOTHESIS: Elderly patients have worse 30-day outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals. PATIENTS: All patients who had a pancreaticoduodenectomy from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2007, were identified. METHODS: Multiple logistic regression models were developed to assess the association between age and 30-day outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day postoperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Of the 2610 patients identified, 977 (37.4%) were elderly and 1633 (62.6%) were younger. Overall morbidity was 36.5%. Elderly patients had a higher likelihood of developing at least 1 morbidity (surgical site infection, wound disruption, outpatient pneumonia, unplanned intubation, pulmonary embolism, prolonged ventilation, acute renal failure, urinary tract infection, stroke, cardiac arrest, deep venous thrombosis, sepsis, or return to the operating room) compared with that of younger patients (40.7% vs 34.0%; odds ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.51; P = .01). Overall mortality was 2.7%. Elderly patients had a higher likelihood of mortality compared with that of younger patients (4.3% vs 1.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-3.43; P = .01). In patients who had at least 1 morbidity, mortality was 10.1% in the elderly compared with 4.1% in the younger patients (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Advanced age is independently associated with morbidity and death following pancreaticoduodenectomy. In addition, the elderly have a higher mortality after a complication compared with that of younger patients, suggesting that advanced age may have a role in "failure to rescue."
BACKGROUND: Single-institution case series suggest that elderly patients do as well as younger patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy. OBJECTIVES: To compare morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients older than 70 years vs younger patients. HYPOTHESIS: Elderly patients have worse 30-day outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals. PATIENTS: All patients who had a pancreaticoduodenectomy from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2007, were identified. METHODS: Multiple logistic regression models were developed to assess the association between age and 30-day outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day postoperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Of the 2610 patients identified, 977 (37.4%) were elderly and 1633 (62.6%) were younger. Overall morbidity was 36.5%. Elderly patients had a higher likelihood of developing at least 1 morbidity (surgical site infection, wound disruption, outpatientpneumonia, unplanned intubation, pulmonary embolism, prolonged ventilation, acute renal failure, urinary tract infection, stroke, cardiac arrest, deep venous thrombosis, sepsis, or return to the operating room) compared with that of younger patients (40.7% vs 34.0%; odds ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.51; P = .01). Overall mortality was 2.7%. Elderly patients had a higher likelihood of mortality compared with that of younger patients (4.3% vs 1.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-3.43; P = .01). In patients who had at least 1 morbidity, mortality was 10.1% in the elderly compared with 4.1% in the younger patients (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Advanced age is independently associated with morbidity and death following pancreaticoduodenectomy. In addition, the elderly have a higher mortality after a complication compared with that of younger patients, suggesting that advanced age may have a role in "failure to rescue."
Authors: Nina P Tamirisa; Abhishek D Parmar; Gabriela M Vargas; Hemalkumar B Mehta; E Molly Kilbane; Bruce L Hall; Henry A Pitt; Taylor S Riall Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: John R Bergquist; Christopher R Shubert; Daniel S Ubl; Cornelius A Thiels; Michael L Kendrick; Mark J Truty; Elizabeth B Habermann Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Eran Sadot; Diane L Reidy-Lagunes; Laura H Tang; Richard Kinh Gian Do; Mithat Gonen; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; T Peter Kingham; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Brian R Untch; Murray F Brennan; William R Jarnagin; Peter J Allen Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Russell Lewis; Jeffrey A Drebin; Mark P Callery; Douglas Fraker; Tara S Kent; Jenna Gates; Charles M Vollmer Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2012-09-24 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Mary A Waterhouse; Elizabeth A Burmeister; Dianne L O'Connell; Emma L Ballard; Susan J Jordan; Neil D Merrett; David Goldstein; David Wyld; Monika Janda; Vanessa L Beesley; Madeleine E Payne; Helen M Gooden; Rachel E Neale Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Jukes P Namm; Kiran H Thakrar; Chi-Hsiung Wang; Susan J Stocker; Malini D Sur; Jonathan Berlin; William Dale; Mark S Talamonti; Kevin K Roggin Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2017-12