Y Edden1, S D Wexner, M Berho. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida 33331, USA.
Abstract
AIM: The response to combined neoadjuvant therapy for advanced stage rectal adenocarcinoma is predictive of outcome. In addition to both clinical and pathological features, the expression of a variety of molecules may provide another method of identifying tumour responsiveness to pre-operative therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate several markers in the apoptotic pathway as well as expression of Cox-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to determine their ability to predict response to neoadjuvant therapy. METHOD: In total, 152 patients with advanced rectal adenocarcinoma were treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection. Paraffin-embedded sections obtained before and after therapy were assessed by immunohistochemical staining for Cox-2, VEGF, p53, p21, p27, Bax, BCL-2 and apoptosis protease-activating factor 1 (APAF-1). These stains were correlated with tumour regression grade, complete pathological response and T-downstaging of the surgical specimen. Clinical and pathological data were also collected. Data were analysed using the χ2 and Spearman's correlation tests. RESULTS: Pathological complete response was seen in 24.5% of patients. Amongst the apoptosis-associated markers, only APAF-1 expression was found to be significantly associated with tumour regression grade (P<0.001), complete pathological response (P<0.031) and T-downstaging (P<0.004). On multivariate analysis, APAF-1 expression was found to be independently associated with good tumour regression grade. In contrast, overexpression of Cox-2 and VEGF in pretreatment biopsies was related to less tumour regression (P<0.003) and less likelihood of T-downstaging (P<0.03). CONCLUSION: Immunohistochemical evaluation of initial biopsy specimens of rectal cancer with APAF-1, Cox-2 and VEGF may predict tumour response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. Those with an expected limited response may be considered for other investigational neoadjuvant protocols.
AIM: The response to combined neoadjuvant therapy for advanced stage rectal adenocarcinoma is predictive of outcome. In addition to both clinical and pathological features, the expression of a variety of molecules may provide another method of identifying tumour responsiveness to pre-operative therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate several markers in the apoptotic pathway as well as expression of Cox-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to determine their ability to predict response to neoadjuvant therapy. METHOD: In total, 152 patients with advanced rectal adenocarcinoma were treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection. Paraffin-embedded sections obtained before and after therapy were assessed by immunohistochemical staining for Cox-2, VEGF, p53, p21, p27, Bax, BCL-2 and apoptosis protease-activating factor 1 (APAF-1). These stains were correlated with tumour regression grade, complete pathological response and T-downstaging of the surgical specimen. Clinical and pathological data were also collected. Data were analysed using the χ2 and Spearman's correlation tests. RESULTS: Pathological complete response was seen in 24.5% of patients. Amongst the apoptosis-associated markers, only APAF-1 expression was found to be significantly associated with tumour regression grade (P<0.001), complete pathological response (P<0.031) and T-downstaging (P<0.004). On multivariate analysis, APAF-1 expression was found to be independently associated with good tumour regression grade. In contrast, overexpression of Cox-2 and VEGF in pretreatment biopsies was related to less tumour regression (P<0.003) and less likelihood of T-downstaging (P<0.03). CONCLUSION: Immunohistochemical evaluation of initial biopsy specimens of rectal cancer with APAF-1, Cox-2 and VEGF may predict tumour response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. Those with an expected limited response may be considered for other investigational neoadjuvant protocols.
Authors: Sunil V Patel; Campbell S Roxburgh; Efsevia Vakiani; Jinru Shia; J Joshua Smith; Larissa K Temple; Philip Paty; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Garrett Nash; Jose Guillem; Abraham Wu; Marsha Reyngold; Martin R Weiser Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Tobias Leibold; Vanessa W Hui; Jinru Shia; Jeannine A Ruby; Elyn R Riedel; José G Guillem Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2014-04-13 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: María González-González; Jacinto Garcia; José A Alcazar; María L Gutiérrez; Luis M Gónzalez; Oscar Bengoechea; María M Abad; Angel Santos-Briz; Oscar Blanco; Manuela Martín; Ana Rodríguez; Manuel Fuentes; Luis Muñoz-Bellvis; Alberto Orfao; Jose M Sayagues Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Jeong Won Lee; Jong Hoon Lee; Byoung Yong Shim; Sung Hwan Kim; Mi-Joo Chung; Bong-Hyeon Kye; Hyung Jin Kim; Hyeon Min Cho; Hong Seok Jang Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 1.889