Literature DB >> 21689331

Antegrade colonic enema for faecal incontinence in adults: long-term results of 75 patients.

N Chéreau1, J H Lefèvre, C Shields, N Chafai, M Lefrancois, E Tiret, Y Parc.   

Abstract

AIM: Faecal incontinence is a significant source of distress, and a permanent stoma is frequently offered to these patients. The antegrade colonic enema (ACE) procedure is an alternative approach to treat faecal incontinence. The long-term outcome remains unknown in adults with faecal incontinence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results of the ACE procedure for incontinence in adults and its impact upon quality of life.
METHOD: All patients who underwent an ACE procedure between 1999 and 2009 were included. Clinical and demographic data and postoperative course were obtained from a review of medical records and databases. Each patient underwent a telephone interview. Quality of life was assessed using the GIQLI and SF36 scores, and faecal incontinence was evaluated using the Wexner score.
RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (54 females; 72%) were included. An ileal neoappendicostomy was performed in 68 patients (90%). The mean hospital stay was 9 days (range 6-24 days). Early complications occurred in four patients and late surgical complications (after 3 months) were observed in 12 (16%) patients. At a median follow up of 48 months, 64 (91%) were still performing enemas, and treatment was judged to be successful in 55 (86%) of 64 patients. The Wexner score was 3.4 ± 2.4, showing a significant reduction when compared with the preoperative value (P < 0.0001). Quality of life scores were in the range of a control population.
CONCLUSION: The ACE procedure is an effective long-term strategy in the treatment of faecal incontinence, with low and acceptable morbidity, and should be preferred before definitive colostomy.
© 2011 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2011 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21689331     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02651.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current status: new technologies for the treatment of patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Andreas M Kaiser; Guy R Orangio; Massarat Zutshi; Suraj Alva; Tracy L Hull; Peter W Marcello; David A Margolin; Janice F Rafferty; W Donald Buie; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Clinical Challenges of Fecal Incontinence in the Elderly.

Authors:  Hadie Razjouyan; Shanti Prasad; Sita Chokhavatia
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09

Review 3.  Ileal neoappendicostomy for antegrade colonic enema (ACE) in the treatment of fecal incontinence and chronic constipation: a systematic review.

Authors:  H A Abildgaard; M Børgager; M B Ellebæk; N Qvist
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Malone Antegrade Continence Enema in Patients with Perineal Colostomy After Rectal Resection.

Authors:  Jin-Hai Wang; Jia-He Xu; Feng Ye; Xiang-Ming Xu; Jian-Jiang Lin; Wen-Bin Chen
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 0.656

5.  Percutaneous endoscopic caecostomy for severe constipation in adults: feasibility, durability, functional and quality of life results at 1 year follow-up.

Authors:  Emilie Duchalais; Guillaume Meurette; Surendra K Mantoo; Marc Le Rhun; Stanislas Bruley des Varannes; Paul-Antoine Lehur; Emmanuel Coron
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Long-term outcomes of a Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) for the treatment of fecal incontinence or constipation in adults.

Authors:  R Sturkenboom; A A van der Wilt; S M J van Kuijk; A Ahmad; P T Janssen; L P S Stassen; J Melenhorst; S O Breukink
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.571

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.