Literature DB >> 21689314

Validation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis (AJCC TNM) staging in patients with stage II and stage III colorectal carcinoma: analysis of 2511 cases from a medical centre in Korea.

K H Kim1, S S Yang, Y S Yoon, S-B Lim, C S Yu, J C Kim.   

Abstract

AIM: The sixth and seventh editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system for patients with stage II and stage III colorectal carcinoma (AJCC-6 and AJCC-7) were compared.
METHOD: Between 2000 and 2007, 2511 stage II/III colorectal carcinoma patients received primary surgical resection at the Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea). All patients were staged using AJCC-6 and AJCC-7 TNM systems. Patients with synchronous or other cancers, those given preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy and those in whom fewer than 12 lymph nodes were resected, were excluded. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared.
RESULTS: Of 2511 patients, 255 (10.2%) had different stages in the AJCC-6 and AJCC-7. For the AJCC-7, the 5-year OS by stage was 94.2% for stage IIA, 88.8% for stage IIB, 83.5% for stage IIC, 91.8% for stage IIIA, 81.8% for stage IIIB and 72.0% for stage IIIC. The OS and the DFS were not significantly different for the new substages IIB (n = 57) and IIC (n = 34) (P = 0.34 and P = 0.87, respectively). For the 187 patients with stage T3N2a cancer, the OS and the DFS were significantly different from stage IIIB other than T3N2a (P = 0.008 and P = 0.01, respectively) and there were no statistically significant differences in OS between the T3N2a group and the IIIC group (P = 0.46).
CONCLUSION: The study indicates that AJCC-7 has better prognostic validity than AJCC-6 for staging of patients with stage II and stage III colorectal carcinoma.
© 2011 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2011 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21689314     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02625.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  17 in total

1.  Should isolated peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer be sub-classified into stage IVB in era of modern chemotherapy?

Authors:  H Ishida; K Kumamoto; K Ishibashi; S Hatano; T Matsuzawa; N Okada; Y Kumagai; H Baba; N Haga
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  High expression levels of unc-51-like kinase 1 as a predictor of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yifeng Zou; Zexian Chen; Xiaowen He; Xiaosheng He; Xianrui Wu; Yufeng Chen; Xiaojian Wu; Jianping Wang; Ping Lan
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Lymph node ratio as an independent prognostic indicator in stage III colorectal cancer: especially for fewer than 12 lymph nodes examined.

Authors:  Kewei Jiang; Yi Zhu; Yan Liu; Yingjiang Ye; Qiwei Xie; Xiaodong Yang; Shan Wang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-08-21

4.  Tumor deposit is a poor prognostic indicator in patients who underwent simultaneous resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Qi Lin; Ye Wei; Li Ren; Yunshi Zhong; Chunzhi Qin; Peng Zheng; Pingping Xu; Dexiang Zhu; Meiling Ji; Jianmin Xu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  ROR1 expression as a biomarker for predicting prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jian-Kang Zhou; Yu-Zhu Zheng; Xue-Sha Liu; Qiheng Gou; Rui Ma; Cheng-Lin Guo; Carlo M Croce; Lunxu Liu; Yong Peng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-16

6.  Is the prediction of prognosis not improved by the seventh edition of the TNM classification for colorectal cancer? Analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database.

Authors:  Peng Gao; Yong-xi Song; Zhen-ning Wang; Ying-ying Xu; Lin-lin Tong; Jing-xu Sun; Miao Yu; Hui-mian Xu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Which is a more accurate predictor in colorectal survival analysis? Nine data mining algorithms vs. the TNM staging system.

Authors:  Peng Gao; Xin Zhou; Zhen-ning Wang; Yong-xi Song; Lin-lin Tong; Ying-ying Xu; Zhen-yu Yue; Hui-mian Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Clinical Features and Prognosis of Resectable Primary Colorectal Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ho-Su Lee; Jae Seung Soh; Seohyun Lee; Jung Ho Bae; Kyung-Jo Kim; Byong Duk Ye; Jeong-Sik Byeon; Seung-Jae Myung; Suk-Kyun Yang; Sun A Kim; Young Soo Park; Seok-Byung Lim; Jin Cheon Kim; Chang Sik Yu; Dong-Hoon Yang
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2015-10-15

9.  Association between ERCC1 and TS mRNA levels and disease free survival in colorectal cancer patients receiving oxaliplatin and fluorouracil (5-FU) adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Sheng Li; Liangjun Zhu; Li Yao; Lei Xia; Liangxi Pan
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Benchmarking trial between France and Australia comparing management of primary rectal cancer beyond TME and locally recurrent rectal cancer (PelviCare Trial): rationale and design.

Authors:  Quentin Denost; Florence Saillour; Lindy Masya; Helene Maillou Martinaud; Stephanie Guillon; Marion Kret; Eric Rullier; Bruno Quintard; Michael Solomon
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.