Literature DB >> 21689280

The first 3 years of national bowel cancer screening at a single UK tertiary centre.

S Gupta1, B P Saunders, C Fraser, R H Kennedy, A Ignjatovic, S Sala, S Marshall, N Suzuki, M Vance, S Thomas-Gibson.   

Abstract

AIM: St Mark's Bowel Cancer Screening Centre commenced screening in October 2006 as a contributor to the national programme. The first 35 months' experience is reported.
METHOD: Individuals with a positive faecal occult blood test (FOBT) were offered colonoscopy or alternatives if they had significant comorbidity. All screening data were collected prospectively.
RESULTS: Of the 98 815 FOBT kits issued, 42 523 were returned (43% uptake; 20.79% men). In total, 1339/1488 (90%) FOBT-positive participants attended the nurse clinic (57% men). Of these, 1057 had an index colonoscopy, 115 had a computed tomography colonoscopy (CTC) and eight had a flexible sigmoidoscopy. Five hundred and seventeen (44%) procedures were 'normal' (no polyps/cancers). Eighty (6%) individuals had colorectal cancer. The polyp detection rate in index procedures, including colonoscopy, CTC and flexible sigmoidoscopy, was 50%. The adenoma detection rate of all colonoscopies was 62.8%. The median polyp size was 5 (1-80) mm. In total, 1200 colonoscopies were performed by five accredited colonoscopists (96% completion rate). There were 13 (1%) adverse events with < 1 in 500 patients undergoing polypectomy requiring a transfusion. There was one 30-day postsurgical mortality, one perforation and no colonoscopy-related mortality. Almost all 39/40 (97%) patients in the BCS programme felt that the findings were adequately explained compared with 21/32 (64%) elective patients (P < 0.001) within the same unit.
CONCLUSIONS: At this bowel cancer screening single centre, colonoscopy completion rates were high (unadjusted caecal intubation rate of 96%) and complication rates were low. In contrast to other published data, the uptake and cancer-detection rates were lower.
© 2011 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2011 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21689280     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02567.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  5 in total

1.  Response to Jacobo Dib Jr.

Authors:  Ankie Reumkens; Silvia Sanduleanu
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Post-Colonoscopy Complications: A Systematic Review, Time Trends, and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Studies.

Authors:  Ankie Reumkens; Eveline J A Rondagh; C Minke Bakker; Bjorn Winkens; Ad A M Masclee; Silvia Sanduleanu
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Sex is a stronger predictor of colorectal adenoma and advanced adenoma than fecal occult blood test.

Authors:  Monika Ferlitsch; Georg Heinze; Petra Salzl; Martha Britto-Arias; Elisabeth Waldmann; Karoline Reinhart; Christina Bannert; Elisabeth Fasching; Peter Knoflach; Werner Weiss; Michael Trauner; Arnulf Ferlitsch
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  A cost-efficacy decision analysis of prophylactic clip placement after endoscopic removal of large polyps.

Authors:  Neehar D Parikh; Kyle Zanocco; Rajesh N Keswani; Andrew J Gawron
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 5.  Anticoagulation and antiplatelet management in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A review of current evidence.

Authors:  Andrew Chan; Hamish Philpott; Amanda H Lim; Minnie Au; Derrick Tee; Damian Harding; Mohamed Asif Chinnaratha; Biju George; Rajvinder Singh
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-11-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.