Literature DB >> 21689187

Polymorphism in the couch potato gene clines in eastern Australia but is not associated with ovarian dormancy in Drosophila melanogaster.

Siu F Lee1, Carla M Sgrò, Jennifer Shirriffs, Choon W Wee, Lea Rako, Belinda van Heerwaarden, Ary A Hoffmann.   

Abstract

Natural selection can generate parallel latitudinal clines in traits and gene frequencies across continents, but these have rarely been linked. An amino acid (isoleucine to lysine, or I462K) polymorphism of the couch potato (cpo) gene in Drosophila melanogaster is thought to control female reproductive diapause cline in North America (Schmidt et al. 2008, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 105, 16207-16211). Here, we show that under standard diapause-inducing conditions (12 °C and short photoperiod) (Saunders et al. 1989, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 86, 3748-3752), egg maturation in Australian flies is delayed, but not arrested at previtellogenic stages. At 12 °C, the phenotypic distribution in egg development was bimodal at stages 8 and 14 and showed a strong nonlinear pattern on the east coast of Australia, with incidence of egg maturation delay (ovarian dormancy) increasing both toward tropical and temperate climates. Furthermore, we found no evidence for an association between the cpo I462K polymorphism and ovarian dormancy at either 12 or 10 °C (when egg maturation was often delayed at stage 7). Owing to strong linkage disequilibrium, the latitudinal cline in cpo allele frequencies was no longer evident once variation in the In(3R)P inversion polymorphism was taken into account. Our results suggest that the standard diapause-inducing conditions (12 °C and short photoperiod) were not sufficient to cause the typical previtellogenic developmental arrest in Australian flies and that the cpo I462K polymorphism does not explain the observed delay in egg development. In conclusion, ovarian dormancy does not show a simple latitudinal cline, and the lack of cpo-dormancy association suggests a different genetic basis to reproductive dormancy in North America and Australia.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21689187     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05155.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  15 in total

Review 1.  Revisiting classic clines in Drosophila melanogaster in the age of genomics.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Adrion; Matthew W Hahn; Brandon S Cooper
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 2.  Pleiotropy, constraint, and modularity in the evolution of life histories: insights from genomic analyses.

Authors:  Kimberly A Hughes; Jeff Leips
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Polymorphism in the neurofibromin gene, Nf1, is associated with antagonistic selection on wing size and development time in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Siu F Lee; Ying Chen Eyre-Walker; Rahul V Rane; Caroline Reuter; Giovanna Vinti; Lea Rako; Linda Partridge; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Secondary contact and local adaptation contribute to genome-wide patterns of clinal variation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Alan O Bergland; Ray Tobler; Josefa González; Paul Schmidt; Dmitri Petrov
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Persistence of a Wolbachia infection frequency cline in Drosophila melanogaster and the possible role of reproductive dormancy.

Authors:  Peter Kriesner; William R Conner; Andrew R Weeks; Michael Turelli; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Drosophila americana Diapausing Females Show Features Typical of Young Flies.

Authors:  Micael Reis; Felipe B Valer; Cristina P Vieira; Jorge Vieira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An Intronic Polymorphism in couch potato Is Not Distributed Clinally in European Drosophila melanogaster Populations nor Does It Affect Diapause Inducibility.

Authors:  Valeria Zonato; Giorgio Fedele; Charalambos P Kyriacou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Life-History Evolution and the Genetics of Fitness Components in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Thomas Flatt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  A collection of Australian Drosophila datasets on climate adaptation and species distributions.

Authors:  Sandra B Hangartner; Ary A Hoffmann; Ailie Smith; Philippa C Griffin
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 6.444

10.  The Insulin-Like Proteins dILPs-2/5 Determine Diapause Inducibility in Drosophila.

Authors:  Luca Schiesari; Gabriele Andreatta; Charalambos P Kyriacou; Michael B O'Connor; Rodolfo Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.