| Literature DB >> 21688926 |
Brett Pelham1, Mauricio Carvallo.
Abstract
This article addresses Simonsohn's (2011) critique of field studies of implicit egotism. We argue that Simonsohn provides no compelling theoretical reason to believe that implicit egotism should be valid only in the laboratory. In addition, we argue that a careful analysis of most of Simonsohn's studies of implicit egotism shows that they provide little or no power to reveal real effects of implicit egotism. We conclude that it is more constructive to try to identify theoretically derived moderators of implicit egotism than to try to document that it is always spurious in the field. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved.Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21688926 DOI: 10.1037/a0023526
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pers Soc Psychol ISSN: 0022-3514