| Literature DB >> 21687748 |
Zhanna A Ktsoyan1, Natalia V Beloborodova, Anahit M Sedrakyan, George A Osipov, Zaruhi A Khachatryan, Denise Kelly, Gayane P Manukyan, Karine A Arakelova, Alvard I Hovhannisyan, Andrey Y Olenin, Arsen A Arakelyan, Karine A Ghazaryan, Rustam I Aminov.
Abstract
The human gastrointestinal tract is inhabited by a diverse and dense symbiotic microbiota, the composition of which is the result of host-microbe co-evolution and co-adaptation. This tight integration creates intense cross-talk and signaling between the host and microbiota at the cellular and metabolic levels. In many genetic or infectious diseases the balance between host and microbiota may be compromised resulting in erroneous communication. Consequently, the composition of the human metabolome, which includes the gut metabolome, may be different in health and disease states in terms of microbial products and metabolites entering systemic circulation. To test this hypothesis, we measured the level of hydroxy, branched, cyclopropyl and unsaturated fatty acids, aldehydes, and phenyl derivatives in blood of patients with a hereditary autoinflammatory disorder, familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), and in patients with peptic ulceration (PU) resulting from Helicobacter pylori infection. Discriminant function analysis of a data matrix consisting of 94 cases as statistical units (37 FMF patients, 14 PU patients, and 43 healthy controls) and the concentration of 35 microbial products in the blood as statistical variables revealed a high accuracy of the proposed model (all cases were correctly classified). This suggests that the profile of microbial products and metabolites in the human metabolome is specific for a given disease and may potentially serve as a biomarker for disease.Entities:
Keywords: discriminant function analysis; familial Mediterranean fever; gas chromatography/mass spectrometry; metabolome; microbial fatty acids; peptic ulcer; phenolic compounds
Year: 2011 PMID: 21687748 PMCID: PMC3109323 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2010.00148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Concentration of compounds and their potential microbial source in blood of FMF and PU patients and healthy controls.
| Substance | Potential microbial source | Healthy controls | FMF remission | FMF attack | PU patients |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Hydroxy lauric (2hC12:0) | 0.90 | 2.4 (1.5–3.9) | 1.35 (0.75–1.75) | 2.35 (1.55–2.50) | |
| 3-Hydroxy lauric (3hC12:0) | 2.70 (2.00–3.65) | 4.5 (4.0–5.9) | 2.15 (1.18–3.35) | 5.30 (3.44–6.03) | |
| 3-Hydroxy stearic (3hC18:0) | 11.3 (9.2–16.0) | 40.9 (19.7– 50.4) | 12.0 (9.88–36.4) | 39.35 (34.4–44.1) | |
| 10-Hydroxy stearic (10hC18:0) | 27.4 (16.7–36.45) | 61.8 (43.9–71.6) | 30.1 (21.7–46.2) | 65.2 (50.3–73.73) | |
| Iso-myristic (iC14:0) | 69.8 (50.7–108.8) | 70.6 (54.9–100.5) | 53 (39.9–85.3) | 139 (99–204) | |
| Iso-pentadecanoic (iC15:0) | 366.4 (292–621) | 429 (237–480) | 286 (221–511) | 783 (442–1023) | |
| Iso-palmitic (iC16:0) | 1193 (862–1563) | 1330 (804–1457) | 1052 (796–1343) | 1863 (1470–2309) | |
| Iso-heptadecanoic (iC17:0) | 2794 (1824–3921) | 2902 (2655–3749) | 2567 (1902–3636) | 4275 (3470–5868) | |
| Iso-stearic (iC18:0) | 26.7 (16.75–36.5) | 69.4 (45.7–112.9) | 43.2 (25.3–121.8) | 100.9 (90.15–130.4) | |
| Anteiso-pentadecanoic (aC15:0) | 377 (316–607) | 411 (336–628) | 319 (270–563) | 858 (487–1228) | |
| Anteiso-heptadecanoic (aC17:0) | 1601 (1215–2232) | 1879 (1332–2131) | 1542 (1052–2108) | 2943 (2517–3955) | |
| Anteiso-nonadecanoic (aC19:0) | 179 (136–213) | 205 (174–212) | 176 (143–216) | 123.5 (97.9–137.5) | |
| Cyclopropyl heptadecanoic (C17cyc) | 1.60 (1.05–2.25) | 5.0 (4.2–5.9) | 2.50 (1.73–5.80) | 10.35 (7.88–23.38) | |
| Cyclopropyl nonadecanoic (C19cyc) | 19.9 (13.05–32.7) | 53.7 (42.3–112.4) | 28.5 (19.6–98.9) | 49.95 (40.53–70.95) | |
| 20.00 (7.45–28.75) | 17.6 (8.3–29.6) | 9.20 (6.10–18.55) | 11.65 (9.23–18.42) | ||
| 142 (78–364) | 167 (130–200) | 74.7 (50.7–124.5) | 297 (206–429) | ||
| 8.30 (5.00–15.15) | 8.0 (6.5–23.3) | 5.60 (4.65–11.93) | 5.1 (3.6–6.4) | ||
| 1054 (859–1290) | 955 (741–1082) | 835 (617–994) | 964 (868–1227) | ||
| 157 (110–236) | 189 (129–200) | 108 (80–156) | 238 (189–284) | ||
| 210 (149–301) | 414 (336–691) | 280 (212–501) | 596 (483–921) | ||
| 4594 (2655–5915) | 4372 (3897–5595) | 4445 (3203–5452) | 7605 (6798–10102) | ||
| 840 (725–954) | 920 (851–1044) | 775 (645–862) | 1072 (866–1243) | ||
| 72.2 (54.6–100.9) | 81.4 (74.4–100.8) | 63.2 (50.5–81.7) | 57.7 (38.0–77.5) | ||
| Iso-myristic (iC14A) | 92.6 (57.4–131.3) | 69.2 (65.2–77.6) | 106.3 (78.8–131.3) | 84.6 (78.2–128.0) | |
| Myristic (C14A) | 85.3 (61.3–134.0) | 102.0 (66.4–136.0) | 95.5 (81.6–118.4) | 173 (136–249) | |
| Anteiso-pentadecanoic (aC15A) | 119 (75–184) | 102 (83–164) | 105.1 (85.6–152.8) | 89.4 (79.8–120.4) | |
| Iso-palmitic (iC16A) | 386 (278–538) | 352 (249–372) | 462 (339–585) | 466 (309–568) | |
| anteiso-heptadecanoic (aCa17A) | 1014 (688–1474) | 788 (724–901) | 1287 (959–1807) | 1454 (836–1710) | |
| Oleic (C18:1d9A) | 11518 (9277–13406) | 9110 (7882–9278) | 9502 (8300–11835) | 11267 (9647–14147) | |
| 4072 (3260–5252) | 3219 (2101–3631) | 3217 (2470–4595) | 3190 (2881–4116) | ||
| Benzoic acid | 104 (75.3–144.9) | 210 (138–283) | 185 (93–315) | 230 (224–276) | |
| 3-Phenylpropionic acid | 99.2 (49.6–167.0) | 70.4 (44.0–120.7) | 63.5 (16.7–113.2) | 24.7 (17.1–41.3) | |
| Phenylacetic acid | 66.8 (25.4–141.5) | 66.2 (0.0–144.9) | 54.7 (24.8–77.9) | 67.7 (46.2–115.1) | |
| 3-Phenyllactic acid | 54.7 (45.0–81.4) | 47.7 (42.4–57.7) | 77.6 (58.5–115.2) | 65.7 (57.3–75.1) | |
| 3-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-lactic acid | 303 (222–377) | 261 (206–307) | 300 (232–478) | 302.5 (264–393) | |
.
.
.
*p < 0.05 significance compared to healthy controls.
< 0.05 significance between FMF and PU patients.
< 0.05 significance between FMF stages.
.
Figure 1Scatterplot of DA model based on concentration of fatty acids and phenolics in blood. Number of variables in model: 35; grouping – 4 groups. Root 1, 2 – discriminant functions 1 and 2 (first and second canonical roots). Healthy controls are shown in blue circles; FMF attack – in green circles; FMF remission – in yellow circles; and PU – in purple circles. Class centers are shown in dark blue squares.
Classification table of correct estimates based on 35 variables set.
| Groups | DA accuracy (%) | Predicted group membership | Total ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control ( | FMF attack ( | FMF remission ( | PU ( | |||
| Control | 100.0 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43 |
| FMF attack | 100.0 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 24 |
| FMF remission | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| PU | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Total | 100.0 | 43 | 24 | 13 | 14 | 94 |
Wilks’ lambda test of class center separation.
| Test of function (s) | Wilks’ lambda | Chi-square | Discriminant function | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 through 3 | 0.007 | 360.316 | 105 | 0.000 |
| 2 through 3 | 0.095 | 172.905 | 68 | 0.000 |
| 3 | 0.402 | 67.021 | 33 | 0.000 |