| Literature DB >> 21687548 |
Nikolaos J Tsagarakis1, Nektaria A Kentrou, Georgios Kakiopoulos, Georgios Androutsos, Athanasios Galanopoulos, Christos Michaelidis, Dimitra Rontogianni, Apostolos Tolis, Stavroula Chini, Georgios Gortzolidis, Konstantinos A Papadimitriou, Dimitra Skoumi, Konstantina Tzanetou, Georgios Paterakis.
Abstract
Aggressive lymphomas can present with symptoms mimicking life-threatening infection. Flow cytometry (FC) is usually recommended for the classification and staging of lymphomas in patients with organomegaly and atypical cells in effusions and blood, after the exclusion of other possible diagnoses. FC may also have a place in the initial diagnostic investigation of aggressive lymphoma. Three cases are presented here of highly aggressive lymphomas in young adults, which presented with the clinical picture of fever of unknown origin (FUO) in patients severely ill. All followed a life-threatening clinical course, and two developed the hemophagocytic syndrome (HPS), but microbiological, immunological, and morphological evaluation and immunohistochemistry (IHC) failed to substantiate an early diagnosis. FC was the technique that provided conclusive diagnostic evidence of lymphoma, subsequently verified by IHC. Our experience with these three cases highlights the potential role of FC as an adjunct methodology in the initial assessment of possible highly aggressive lymphoma presenting with the signs and symptoms of life-threatening infection, although the definitive diagnosis should be established by biopsy. In such cases, FC can contribute to the diagnosis of lymphoma, independently of the presence of HPS.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21687548 PMCID: PMC3114563 DOI: 10.1155/2011/743817
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Med
The main clinical features and laboratory results.
| Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical features | |||
| Fever | + | + | + |
| Hepatosplenomegaly | + | + | + |
| Lymphadenopathy | + | + | + |
| Weakness | + | + | + |
| Weight loss | − | + | − |
| DIC signs | − | − | + |
| Swellings | − | − | + |
| Pleural effusion | + |
| + |
| Hepatic failure | + | − | + |
| Renal failure | + | + | + |
|
| |||
| Laboratory findings | |||
| hemoglobin (Hb) | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ |
| platelets (PLTs) | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ |
| White blood cells (WBCs) | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ |
| C-reactive protein (CRP) | ↑ |
|
|
| Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) | ↑ |
| ~ |
| Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) | ↑ |
|
|
|
| ↑ |
|
|
| Ferritin | ↑ |
|
|
| d-dimers | − |
| ~ |
| CMV, EBV, Parvo-B19, herpes viruses and Coxsackie B1-B6 | − | − | − |
| Hepatitis-B virus (HBV) | − | + | − |
| Hepatitis-C virus (HCV) | − | − | − |
| Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) | − | − | − |
| Human T-lymphotropic viruses (HTLV-I, -II) | − | − | − |
| Syphilis (VDRL) | − | − | − |
|
| − | − | N |
|
| − | − | − |
|
| − | − | N |
|
| − | N | − |
|
| − | N | − |
|
| N | − | N |
|
| − | N | − |
|
| N | − | N |
|
| N | − | N |
|
| N | − | − |
|
| − | N | − |
|
| N | − | − |
|
| − | N | − |
| CSF | − | N | N |
↑: increase, ↓: decrease, +: positive, ~: not stable, NS: no significant alteration, N: not evaluated, DIC: disseminated intravascular coagulation, VDRL: Venereal Disease Research Laboratory test.
Immunophenotype of atypical cell populations.
| Case 1 | Case 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PB | LN | BM, PB | |
| Atypical lymphocytes | T (31%*) | T (30.5%*) | T8 (3%*) |
| CD3 | 1% | 1% | 100% |
| cCD3 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| CD4 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
| CD8 | 1% | 1% | 100% |
| CD2 | 100% | N | 5% |
| CD7 | 35% | 54% | 95% |
| CD5 | 9% | 8% | 3% |
| TCR | 0.4% | 0.5% | 100% |
| TCR | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0% |
| Tdt | 1% | N | 0% |
| CD34 | 1% | N | 0% |
| CD30(Ki-1) | 55% | 79.5% | 41% |
| EMA | 47% | 30% | 80% |
| CD15 | 3% | 6% | 2% |
| ALK | N | N | 0% |
| CD10 | 0% | N | 0% |
| CD19 | 0% | N | 0% |
| CD20 | 0% | N | 0% |
| CD16 | 1.3% | N | 0% |
| CD56 | 1% | N | 0% |
| HLA-DR | 78% | N | N |
| CD25 | 5% | 15% | N |
| CD14 | 0% | N | 0% |
| Ki-67 | 3% | 22.6% | 40% |
| CD45R0 | 100% | N | N |
| CD45RA | 0.7% | N | N |
PB: peripheral blood, BM: bone marrow, LN: lymph node, c: cytoplasmic, N: not evaluated, *(%) of total nucleated cells, while all other percentages refer to the atypical cell populations.
Figure 1Flow cytometry of the bone marrow and peripheral blood of patient 2, showing a monoclonal TCR Vβ13.2 T-cell population, CD3+, TCRαβ+, CD8+, CD7+, CD30+, EMA+, ALK−, of high mitotic index (Ki-67 = 40%).
Figure 2Flow cytometry of sample from the lymph node of patient 3. The coexpression of CD30 and CD71, in a CD45 and CD3 positive population of high forward scatter characteristics, indicated the possibility of Hodgkin and Reed Sternberg (HRS) cells, based on T cell rosetting around HRS cells. This composite immunophenotype (CD45+/CD30+/CD71+/CD3+/CD20−) (gate HD) was considered due to contributions by the HRS cells and the surrounding T cells.
Figure 3Microscopy of pleural effusion specimen from patient 3 showing Hodgkin-like cells, surrounded by atypical lymphocytes, probably T-cells (HRS-cell-T-cell rosette).