STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multi-institutional database review. OBJECTIVE: To determine if minimally invasive interbody fusion is associated with cost savings when compared with open surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgeries are increasingly recognized as equivalent to open procedures. Although these techniques have been advocated for reducing pain, disability, and length of hospitalization, to date there has been little data demonstrating these benefits. METHODS: This study analyzed inpatient hospital records from the Premier Perspective database (2002 to 2009), including patients who underwent a posterior lumbar fusion with interbody cage placement by ICD-9 code, and had implant charge codes that allowed determination if MIS pedicle screws were utilized. Exclusion criteria included a refusion surgery, deformity, >2 levels, and anterior fusion. Total costs were adjusted for covariates (age, sex, race, hospital geography and setting, payor, and comorbidities) using an analysis of covariance model. RESULTS: A total of 6106 patients were identified (1667 MIS and 4439 open). Length of stay (LOS) for 1-level MIS surgery averaged of 3.35 days versus 3.6 days for open surgery (P≤0.006). For 2-level MIS surgery LOS averaged of 3.4 days versus 4.03 days for open surgery (P≤0.001). Total inflation-adjusted acute hospitalization cost averaged $29,187 for 1-level MIS procedures versus $29,947 for open surgery, a nonsignificant difference (P=0.55). Total inflation-adjusted acute hospitalization cost averaged $2106 lower for 2-level MIS surgery (total costs of $33,879 for MIS vs. $35,984 for open surgery, P=0.0023). Cost savings were attributable primarily to lower room and board ($857), operating room ($359), pharmacy ($304), and laboratory ($166) costs in the MIS group. High variances in the 2-level open surgery with prolonged hospital stay also accounted for overall cost differences. CONCLUSIONS: This data from a large nationwide sample of hospitalizations demonstrates that MIS lumbar interbody fusion results in a statistically significant reduction in hospital LOS and a reduction in total hospital costs with 2-level surgery after adjusting for significant covariates. The majority of cost savings from MIS surgery were due to more rapid mobilization and discharge, as well as a reduction in outliers with extended hospitalizations.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multi-institutional database review. OBJECTIVE: To determine if minimally invasive interbody fusion is associated with cost savings when compared with open surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgeries are increasingly recognized as equivalent to open procedures. Although these techniques have been advocated for reducing pain, disability, and length of hospitalization, to date there has been little data demonstrating these benefits. METHODS: This study analyzed inpatient hospital records from the Premier Perspective database (2002 to 2009), including patients who underwent a posterior lumbar fusion with interbody cage placement by ICD-9 code, and had implant charge codes that allowed determination if MIS pedicle screws were utilized. Exclusion criteria included a refusion surgery, deformity, >2 levels, and anterior fusion. Total costs were adjusted for covariates (age, sex, race, hospital geography and setting, payor, and comorbidities) using an analysis of covariance model. RESULTS: A total of 6106 patients were identified (1667 MIS and 4439 open). Length of stay (LOS) for 1-level MIS surgery averaged of 3.35 days versus 3.6 days for open surgery (P≤0.006). For 2-level MIS surgery LOS averaged of 3.4 days versus 4.03 days for open surgery (P≤0.001). Total inflation-adjusted acute hospitalization cost averaged $29,187 for 1-level MIS procedures versus $29,947 for open surgery, a nonsignificant difference (P=0.55). Total inflation-adjusted acute hospitalization cost averaged $2106 lower for 2-level MIS surgery (total costs of $33,879 for MIS vs. $35,984 for open surgery, P=0.0023). Cost savings were attributable primarily to lower room and board ($857), operating room ($359), pharmacy ($304), and laboratory ($166) costs in the MIS group. High variances in the 2-level open surgery with prolonged hospital stay also accounted for overall cost differences. CONCLUSIONS: This data from a large nationwide sample of hospitalizations demonstrates that MIS lumbar interbody fusion results in a statistically significant reduction in hospital LOS and a reduction in total hospital costs with 2-level surgery after adjusting for significant covariates. The majority of cost savings from MIS surgery were due to more rapid mobilization and discharge, as well as a reduction in outliers with extended hospitalizations.
Authors: Jason I Liounakos; Vignessh Kumar; Aria Jamshidi; Zmira Silman; Christopher R Good; Samuel R Schroerlucke; Andrew Cannestra; Victor Hsu; Jae Lim; Faissal Zahrawi; Pedro M Ramirez; Thomas M Sweeney; Michael Y Wang Journal: J Robot Surg Date: 2021-01-01
Authors: Timothy Y Wang; Vikram A Mehta; Mostafa Gabr; Eric W Sankey; Alexia Bwensa; C Rory Goodwin; Isaac O Karikari; John H Chi; Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr Journal: Int J Spine Surg Date: 2021-12
Authors: Gursukhman S Sidhu; Erik Henkelman; Alexander R Vaccaro; Todd J Albert; Alan Hilibrand; D Greg Anderson; Jeffrey A Rihn Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Mick J Perez-Cruet; Namath S Hussain; G Zachary White; Evan M Begun; Robert A Collins; Daniel K Fahim; Girish K Hiremath; Fadumo M Adbi; Sammy A Yacob Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2014-02-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Chantal E Holy; Katherine A Corso; Dawn E Bowden; Michael J Erb; Jill R Ruppenkamp; Sandra Coombs; John B Pracyk Journal: Med Devices (Auckl) Date: 2021-06-15