BACKGROUND: Comorbidities may affect survival and choice of treatment among cancer patients. In fact, comorbidities have been identified as significant determinants of response to therapy in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia, breast cancer, head and neck cancer, and lung cancer. The Charlson comorbidity index and adult comorbidity evaluation-27 are lists of comorbidities with a weight assigned from 1 to 6 for the former and from 0 to 3 for the latter score, derived from relative risk estimates of a proportional hazard regression model using clinical data. DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the Charlson index and adult comorbidity evaluation-27 score in a cohort of 125 elderly (> 60 years) patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia who received dasatinib after showing resistance or intolerance to imatinib with the aim of establishing associations between comorbidities and the development of pleural effusions or compliance with the drug treatment. RESULTS: We found a significant association between the Charlson index as well as the adult comorbidity evaluation-27 score and the rate of drug reduction or suspension: with regards to the Charlson index, 49% of score 0 patients had a dose reduction compared to 63% of patients with score 1, 74% of those with score 2 and 100% of patients with score 3-5 (P=0.03); with regards to the adult comorbidity evaluation-27 score, 45% of patients had score 0-1 and 69% of patients with score 2-3 had a dose reduction. Of the 65 patients with Charlson score 0, 29% had at least one suspension of treatment (79% for hematologic and 21% for non-hematologic toxicity), compared to 46% of patients with score 1 (37% for hematologic and 69% for non-hematologic toxicity), 58% of patients with score 2 (36% for hematologic and 64% for non-hematologic toxicity) and 100% of patients with score 3 or 4 (all patients for both types of toxicity). High adult comorbidity index-27 scores identified patients at high risk of grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity. Forty-one patients (32.8%) experienced pleural effusion during treatment: the highest scores for both indices were associated with an increased risk of pleural effusions. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with dasatinib, the rate of drug reduction or suspension and the incidence of pleural effusions seem to be associated with the presence of comorbidities: stratification according to the Charlson index and adult comorbidity evaluation-27 score before dasatinib therapy may enable the identification of patients at risk of major toxicities.
BACKGROUND: Comorbidities may affect survival and choice of treatment among cancerpatients. In fact, comorbidities have been identified as significant determinants of response to therapy in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia, breast cancer, head and neck cancer, and lung cancer. The Charlson comorbidity index and adult comorbidity evaluation-27 are lists of comorbidities with a weight assigned from 1 to 6 for the former and from 0 to 3 for the latter score, derived from relative risk estimates of a proportional hazard regression model using clinical data. DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the Charlson index and adult comorbidity evaluation-27 score in a cohort of 125 elderly (> 60 years) patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia who received dasatinib after showing resistance or intolerance to imatinib with the aim of establishing associations between comorbidities and the development of pleural effusions or compliance with the drug treatment. RESULTS: We found a significant association between the Charlson index as well as the adult comorbidity evaluation-27 score and the rate of drug reduction or suspension: with regards to the Charlson index, 49% of score 0 patients had a dose reduction compared to 63% of patients with score 1, 74% of those with score 2 and 100% of patients with score 3-5 (P=0.03); with regards to the adult comorbidity evaluation-27 score, 45% of patients had score 0-1 and 69% of patients with score 2-3 had a dose reduction. Of the 65 patients with Charlson score 0, 29% had at least one suspension of treatment (79% for hematologic and 21% for non-hematologic toxicity), compared to 46% of patients with score 1 (37% for hematologic and 69% for non-hematologic toxicity), 58% of patients with score 2 (36% for hematologic and 64% for non-hematologic toxicity) and 100% of patients with score 3 or 4 (all patients for both types of toxicity). High adult comorbidity index-27 scores identified patients at high risk of grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity. Forty-one patients (32.8%) experienced pleural effusion during treatment: the highest scores for both indices were associated with an increased risk of pleural effusions. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with dasatinib, the rate of drug reduction or suspension and the incidence of pleural effusions seem to be associated with the presence of comorbidities: stratification according to the Charlson index and adult comorbidity evaluation-27 score before dasatinib therapy may enable the identification of patients at risk of major toxicities.
Authors: Mohamed L Sorror; Michael B Maris; Rainer Storb; Frederic Baron; Brenda M Sandmaier; David G Maloney; Barry Storer Journal: Blood Date: 2005-06-30 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Kimmo Porkka; H Jean Khoury; Ronald L Paquette; Yousif Matloub; Ritwik Sinha; Jorge E Cortes Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Neil P Shah; Hagop M Kantarjian; Dong-Wook Kim; Delphine Réa; Pedro E Dorlhiac-Llacer; Jorge H Milone; Jorge Vela-Ojeda; Richard T Silver; H Jean Khoury; Aude Charbonnier; Nina Khoroshko; Ronald L Paquette; Michael Deininger; Robert H Collins; Irma Otero; Timothy Hughes; Eric Bleickardt; Lewis Strauss; Stephen Francis; Andreas Hochhaus Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Arti Hurria; Ilene S Browner; Harvey Jay Cohen; Crystal S Denlinger; Mollie deShazo; Martine Extermann; Apar Kishor P Ganti; Jimmie C Holland; Holly M Holmes; Mohana B Karlekar; Nancy L Keating; June McKoy; Bruno C Medeiros; Ewa Mrozek; Tracey O'Connor; Stephen H Petersdorf; Hope S Rugo; Rebecca A Silliman; William P Tew; Louise C Walter; Alva B Weir; Tanya Wildes Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Wolfgang R Sperr; Thomas Pfeiffer; Gregor Hoermann; Susanne Herndlhofer; Christian Sillaber; Christine Mannhalter; Michael Kundi; Peter Valent Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2014-12-15 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Peter Valent; Emir Hadzijusufovic; Gregor Hoermann; Wolfgang Füreder; Gerit-Holger Schernthaner; Wolfgang R Sperr; Rudolf Kirchmair; Dominik Wolf Journal: Leuk Res Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 3.156
Authors: Susanne Saussele; Marie-Paloma Krauss; Rüdiger Hehlmann; Michael Lauseker; Ulrike Proetel; Lida Kalmanti; Benjamin Hanfstein; Alice Fabarius; Doris Kraemer; Wolfgang E Berdel; Martin Bentz; Peter Staib; Maike de Wit; Martin Wernli; Florian Zettl; Holger F Hebart; Markus Hahn; Jochen Heymanns; Ingo Schmidt-Wolf; Norbert Schmitz; Michael J Eckart; Winfried Gassmann; Andrea Bartholomäus; Antonio Pezzutto; Elisabeth Oppliger Leibundgut; Dominik Heim; Stefan W Krause; Andreas Burchert; Wolf-Karsten Hofmann; Joerg Hasford; Andreas Hochhaus; Markus Pfirrmann; Martin C Müller Journal: Blood Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: D Rea; T Mirault; E Raffoux; N Boissel; A L Andreoli; P Rousselot; H Dombret; E Messas Journal: Leukemia Date: 2014-12-08 Impact factor: 11.528