Literature DB >> 21685356

Inconsistencies in findings from the early lung cancer action project studies of lung cancer screening.

Peter B Bach1.   

Abstract

Long-standing guidelines against screening high-risk individuals for lung cancer may change following the publication of the randomized National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), which shows a benefit of computed tomography compared with chest x-ray screening. Guideline panels will likely also seek additional information from nonrandomized studies of computed tomography screening, such as the Early Lung Cancer Action Project (ELCAP). However, for the ELCAP findings to be incorporated into new guidelines, some inconsistencies in the published data should first be resolved. Specifically, some of the reports from ELCAP appear to contradict others in terms of important endpoints, and several findings from ELCAP appear to be statistically improbable or outliers when compared with analyses and studies by other research groups. Clarification of both internal and external inconsistencies is a prerequisite for evaluation of the body of work published by ELCAP investigators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21685356     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  5 in total

Review 1.  Screening for lung cancer using low-dose spiral CT: 10 years later, state of the art.

Authors:  M Zompatori; M Mascalchi; F Ciccarese; N Sverzellati; U Pastorino
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Cancer screening: the journey from epidemiology to policy.

Authors:  Stephen A Deppen; Melinda C Aldrich; Patricia Hartge; Christine D Berg; Graham A Colditz; Diana B Petitti; Robert A Hiatt
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  MiR-15a-16 represses Cripto and inhibits NSCLC cell progression.

Authors:  Feng Chen; Shi-ke Hou; Hao-jun Fan; Ying-fu Liu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.396

4.  Statistical learning methods as a preprocessing step for survival analysis: evaluation of concept using lung cancer data.

Authors:  Madhusmita Behera; Erin E Fowler; Taofeek K Owonikoko; Walker H Land; William Mayfield; Zhengjia Chen; Fadlo R Khuri; Suresh S Ramalingam; John J Heine
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  IGDB.NSCLC: integrated genomic database of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Sen Kao; Cheng-Kai Shiau; De-Leung Gu; Chun-Ming Ho; Wen-Hui Su; Chian-Feng Chen; Chi-Hung Lin; Yuh-Shan Jou
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.