Literature DB >> 21685350

Comparing two forms of dynamic assessment and traditional assessment of preschool phonological awareness.

Patricia Thatcher Kantor1, Richard K Wagner, Joseph K Torgesen, Carol A Rashotte.   

Abstract

The goal of the current study was to compare two forms of dynamic assessment and standard assessment of preschool children's phonological awareness. The first form of dynamic assessment was a form of scaffolding in which item formats were modified in response to an error so as to make the task easier or more explicit. The second form of dynamic assessment was direct instruction of the phonological awareness tasks. The results indicate that preschool children's phonological awareness can be assessed using standard assessment procedures, provided the items require processing units larger than the individual phoneme. No advantage was found in reliability or validity for either dynamic assessment condition relative to the standard assessment condition. Dynamic assessment does not appear to improve reliability or validity of phonological awareness assessments when preschool children are given tasks that they can perform using standard administration procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21685350      PMCID: PMC3179788          DOI: 10.1177/0022219411407861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Learn Disabil        ISSN: 0022-2194


  8 in total

1.  Development of emergent literacy and early reading skills in preschool children: evidence from a latent-variable longitudinal study.

Authors:  Christopher J Lonigan; Stephen R Burgess; Jason L Anthony
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2000-09

2.  The relationship between phonological awareness and reading: implications for the assessment of phonological awareness.

Authors:  Tiffany P Hogan; Hugh W Catts; Todd D Little
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Response to intervention and dynamic assessment: do we just appear to be speaking the same language?

Authors:  Carol S Lidz; Elizabeth D Peña
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 1.761

4.  Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: a 5-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  R K Wagner; J K Torgesen; C A Rashotte; S A Hecht; T A Barker; S R Burgess; J Donahue; T Garon
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1997-05

5.  Assessment information for predicting upcoming change in language production.

Authors:  L B Olswang; B A Bain
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1996-04

6.  Beginning reading intervention as inoculation or insulin: first-grade reading performance of strong responders to kindergarten intervention.

Authors:  Michael D Coyne; Edward J Kame'enui; Deborah C Simmons; Beth A Harn
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr

Review 7.  Dynamic assessment and response to intervention: two sides of one coin.

Authors:  Elena L Grigorenko
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2008-12-10

Review 8.  Child development and emergent literacy.

Authors:  G J Whitehurst; C J Lonigan
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1998-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.