BACKGROUND: Although assisted reproductive technology (ART) is reported to result in abnormal genomic imprinting and/or altered genomic methylation, few if any studies have used high-throughput methods to analyze genomic methylation in ART embryos. We hypothesized that a microarray-based assessment of genomic methylation could be used to reveal differences between ART and normal preimplantation embryos. METHODS: In this pilot study, we performed methylation-sensitive amplification of genomic DNA from preimplantation mouse blastocysts, obtained by natural mating and either maintained in vivo until E3.5 (n = 4) or cultured in vitro (n = 4) from E0.5 until E3.5. An oligonucleotide microarray was then used to perform comparative hybridization of amplified DNA, allowing us to assess relative methylation at ~16,000 loci on mouse chromosome 7. RESULTS: We show that for in vivo derived embryos, the methylation/microarray results were strikingly consistent. In contrast, all four in vitro cultured embryos showed evidence of generalized hypermethylation as well as greater locus-to-locus variability, when compared with in vivo derived embryos. Genomic segments that overlapped exons and CpG islands were most likely to be hypomethylated in both normal and experimental blastocysts. Other sequence features, such as repetitive elements, were not associated with the presence of or the degree of methylation. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a general assessment of genomic methylation in blastocyst stage embryos is technically feasible. Data from this small sample suggest that in vitro embryo culture is associated with generalized hypermethylation as well as increased locus-to-locus variability in methylation. However, it is premature to conclude that this is a general property of in vitro cultured blastocysts.
BACKGROUND: Although assisted reproductive technology (ART) is reported to result in abnormal genomic imprinting and/or altered genomic methylation, few if any studies have used high-throughput methods to analyze genomic methylation in ART embryos. We hypothesized that a microarray-based assessment of genomic methylation could be used to reveal differences between ART and normal preimplantation embryos. METHODS: In this pilot study, we performed methylation-sensitive amplification of genomic DNA from preimplantation mouseblastocysts, obtained by natural mating and either maintained in vivo until E3.5 (n = 4) or cultured in vitro (n = 4) from E0.5 until E3.5. An oligonucleotide microarray was then used to perform comparative hybridization of amplified DNA, allowing us to assess relative methylation at ~16,000 loci on mouse chromosome 7. RESULTS: We show that for in vivo derived embryos, the methylation/microarray results were strikingly consistent. In contrast, all four in vitro cultured embryos showed evidence of generalized hypermethylation as well as greater locus-to-locus variability, when compared with in vivo derived embryos. Genomic segments that overlapped exons and CpG islands were most likely to be hypomethylated in both normal and experimental blastocysts. Other sequence features, such as repetitive elements, were not associated with the presence of or the degree of methylation. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a general assessment of genomic methylation in blastocyst stage embryos is technically feasible. Data from this small sample suggest that in vitro embryo culture is associated with generalized hypermethylation as well as increased locus-to-locus variability in methylation. However, it is premature to conclude that this is a general property of in vitro cultured blastocysts.
Authors: Béatrice de Montera; Eric Fournier; Habib Allah Shojaei Saadi; Dominic Gagné; Isabelle Laflamme; Patrick Blondin; Marc-André Sirard; Claude Robert Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2013-06-18 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: John Huntriss; Karen Hemmings; Praveen Baskaran; Lee Hazelwood; Kay Elder; Carl Virtanen; David Miller; Helen M Picton Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: J Salvaing; N Peynot; M N Bedhane; S Veniel; E Pellier; C Boulesteix; N Beaujean; N Daniel; V Duranthon Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 6.918