Literature DB >> 21684715

Interim analysis results from the RESTORE-CLI, a randomized, double-blind multicenter phase II trial comparing expanded autologous bone marrow-derived tissue repair cells and placebo in patients with critical limb ischemia.

Richard J Powell1, Anthony J Comerota, Scott A Berceli, Raul Guzman, Timothy D Henry, Edith Tzeng, Omaida Velazquez, William A Marston, Ronnda L Bartel, Amy Longcore, Theresa Stern, Sharon Watling.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Cell therapy is a novel experimental treatment modality for patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) of the lower extremities and no other established treatment options. This study was conducted to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of intramuscular injection of autologous tissue repair cells (TRCs).
METHODS: A prospective, randomized double-blinded, placebo controlled, multicenter study (RESTORE-CLI) was conducted at 18 centers in the United States in patients with CLI and no option for revascularization. Enrollment of 86 patients began in April 2007 and ended in February 2010. For the prospectively planned interim analysis, conducted in February 2010, 33 patients had the opportunity to complete the trial (12 months of follow-up), and 46 patients had completed at least 6 months of follow-up. The interim analysis included analysis of both patient populations. An independent physician performed the bone marrow or sham control aspiration. The aspirate was processed in a closed, automated cell manufacturing system for approximately 12 days to generate the TRC population of stem and progenitor cells. An average of 136 ± 41 × 10(6) total viable cells or electrolyte (control) solution were injected into 20 sites in the ischemic lower extremity. The primary end point was safety as evaluated by adverse events, and serious adverse events as assessed at multiple follow-up time points. Clinical efficacy end points included major amputation-free survival and time to first occurrence of treatment failure (defined as any of the following: major amputation, death, de novo gangrene, or doubling of wound size), as well as major amputation rate and measures of wound healing.
RESULTS: There was no difference in adverse or serious adverse events between the two groups. Statistical analysis revealed a significant increase in time to treatment failure (log-rank test, P = .0053) and amputation-free survival in patients receiving TRC treatment, (log-rank test, P = .038). Major amputation occurred in 19% of TRC-treated patients compared to 43% of controls (P = .14, Fisher exact test). There was evidence of improved wound healing in the TRC-treated patients when compared with controls at 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Intramuscular injection of autologous bone marrow-derived TRCs is safe and decreases the occurrence of clinical events associated with disease progression when compared to placebo in patients with lower extremity CLI and no revascularization options.
Copyright © 2011 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21684715     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  39 in total

1.  Adult stem cells and cardiac regeneration.

Authors:  Kursad Turksen
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 2.  Modulating the vascular response to limb ischemia: angiogenic and cell therapies.

Authors:  John P Cooke; Douglas W Losordo
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  Fabrication and characterization of injectable hydrogels derived from decellularized skeletal and cardiac muscle.

Authors:  J L Ungerleider; T D Johnson; N Rao; K L Christman
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 4.  Concise review: therapeutic potential of adipose tissue-derived angiogenic cells.

Authors:  Krisztina Szöke; Jan E Brinchmann
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 5.  The current state of stem cell therapy for peripheral artery disease.

Authors:  Nitin K Gupta; Ehrin J Armstrong; Sahil A Parikh
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Management of infrapopliteal peripheral arterial occlusive disease.

Authors:  Warren J Gasper; Sara J Runge; Christopher D Owens
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2012-04

Review 7.  Clinical trials of adult stem cell therapy for peripheral artery disease.

Authors:  Crystal M Botham; William L Bennett; John P Cooke
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

Review 8.  Mesenchymal stem cells as a treatment for peripheral arterial disease: current status and potential impact of type II diabetes on their therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  Jinglian Yan; Guodong Tie; Ting Yu Xu; Katharine Cecchini; Louis M Messina
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 9.  Medical management for chronic atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease.

Authors:  Farzana Nawaz Ali; Teresa L Carman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Bone marrow aspirate injection for treatment of critical limb ischemia with comparison to patients undergoing high-risk bypass grafts.

Authors:  Kristina A Giles; Eva M Rzucidlo; Philip P Goodney; Daniel B Walsh; Richard J Powell
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 4.268

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.