Literature DB >> 21684534

Omental infarction caused by laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: CT findings.

J Y Oh1, J H Cho, M J Kang, J H Lee, H J Kwon, K J Nam, M C Kim, H Choi.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the computed tomography (CT) imaging features of omental infarction in patients who underwent laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) for gastric cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 390 patients who underwent LAG for gastric cancer. Two radiologists evaluated the CT images for the presence of omental infarction. The CT pattern was characterized at initial presentation and the evolutional changes were evaluated. The initial CT appearance of omental infarctions were categorized into the following four types: type 1 (ill-defined, heterogeneous, fat density lesion); type 2 (well-defined fat density lesion with rim enhancement); type 3 (well-defined heterogeneous lesion with fat component); and type 4 (well-defined heterogeneous lesion without a fat component).
RESULTS: Of the 390 patients involved, nine patients (2.3%; six male and three female with a mean age of 57 years) were diagnosed with omental infarction. Infarctions averaged 4.1 cm (range 2-7.3 cm) in diameter. Among nine patients with omental infarction, two patients had type 1 lesions, two had type 2, two had type 3, and three type 4. All infarctions became smaller and better defined with evolution. In two patients who presented with type 1 lesions on initial CT, each lesion was progressed to type 2 and type 3 on follow-up CT. In two patients with type 3 lesions on initial CT, the lesions changed to type 4 on follow-up CT.
CONCLUSION: An awareness of the various CT features and evolutional changes in omental infarction after LAG for gastric cancer can help ensure the correct diagnosis and to avoid misdiagnosis for omental implants.
Copyright © 2011 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21684534     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  7 in total

1.  Is partial omentectomy feasible at radical gastrectomy for advanced cancer?

Authors:  Aydin Aktas; Ersin Gundogan; Fatih Sumer; Cuneyt Kayaalp
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-02-23

Review 2.  Postoperative Omental Infarct After Distal Pancreatectomy: Appearance, Etiology Management, and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Ammar A Javed; Fabio Bagante; Ralph H Hruban; Matthew J Weiss; Martin A Makary; Kenzo Hirose; John L Cameron; Christopher L Wolfgang; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Gastric cancer with large bowel obstruction as the first presentation: A case report.

Authors:  Xiuyan Yu; Junshu Zhang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  The Oncological Value of Omentectomy in Gastrectomy for Cancer.

Authors:  Leonie Haverkamp; Hylke J F Brenkman; Jelle P Ruurda; Fiebo J W Ten Kate; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Normal and Abnormal Postoperative Imaging Findings after Gastric Oncologic and Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Cheong Il Shin; Se Hyung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Efficiency of complete omentectomy in patients with resectable gastric cancer: a meta‑analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Akao Zhu; Guang Yin; Xinchun Liu; Wencheng Kong; Yu Zhang; Yuqiang Shan; Rongchao Ying; Jian Zhang; Chunhua Zhou
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  A comparison of total versus partial omentectomy for advanced gastric cancer in laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Authors:  Dong Jin Kim; Jun Hyun Lee; Wook Kim
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.754

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.