Literature DB >> 21684303

Spatial frequency and visual discomfort.

Louise O'Hare1, Paul B Hibbard.   

Abstract

Images created from noise filtered to have an approximately 1/f amplitude spectrum were altered by adding excess energy concentrated at various spatial frequencies. The effects of this manipulation on judgements of visual discomfort were studied. Visual noise with a 1/f amplitude spectrum (typical of natural images) was judged more comfortable than any image with a relative increase in contrast energy within a narrow spatial frequency band. A peak centred on 0.375-1.5cycles/degree of spatial frequency was consistently judged as more uncomfortable than a peak at a higher spatial frequency. This finding was robust to slight differences in eccentricity, and when stimuli were matched for perceived contrast across spatial frequency. These findings are consistent with the idea that deviation from the statistics of natural images could cause discomfort because the visual system is optimised to encode images with the particular statistics typical of natural scenes.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21684303     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  27 in total

1.  Visual discomfort from flicker: Effects of mean light level and contrast.

Authors:  Sanae Yoshimoto; Fang Jiang; Tatsuto Takeuchi; Arnold J Wilkins; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Visual discomfort and flicker.

Authors:  Sanae Yoshimoto; Jesel Garcia; Fang Jiang; Arnold J Wilkins; Tatsuto Takeuchi; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Visual discomfort and depth-of-field.

Authors:  Louise O'Hare; Tingting Zhang; Harold T Nefs; Paul B Hibbard
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-05-16

4.  Emotional effects of dynamic textures.

Authors:  Alexander Toet; Menno Henselmans; Marcel P Lucassen; Theo Gevers
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2011-11-24

5.  Illusory visual motion stimulus elicits postural sway in migraine patients.

Authors:  Shu Imaizumi; Motoyasu Honma; Haruo Hibino; Shinichi Koyama
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-28

6.  Lexical decisions in adults with low and high susceptibility to pattern-related visual stress: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  James M Gilchrist; Peter M Allen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-14

7.  VEP Responses to Op-Art Stimuli.

Authors:  Louise O'Hare; Alasdair D F Clarke; Petra M J Pollux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Uncomfortable images produce non-sparse responses in a model of primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Paul B Hibbard; Louise O'Hare
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Combining universal beauty and cultural context in a unifying model of visual aesthetic experience.

Authors:  Christoph Redies
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  From regular text to artistic writing and artworks: Fourier statistics of images with low and high aesthetic appeal.

Authors:  Tamara Melmer; Seyed A Amirshahi; Michael Koch; Joachim Denzler; Christoph Redies
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.