Literature DB >> 21684232

Observation of resident clinical skills: outcomes of a program of direct observation in the continuity clinic setting.

Ellen K Hamburger1, Sandra Cuzzi, Dale A Coddington, Angela M Allevi, Joseph Lopreiato, Rachel Moon, Clifton Yu, J Lindsey Lane.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of a new multi-institutional program of direct observation and report what faculty observed and the feedback they provided.
METHODS: A program of direct observation of real patient encounters was implemented in 3 pediatric residency programs using a structured clinical observation (SCO) form to document what was observed and the feedback given. Outcome variables included the number of observations made, the nature of the feedback provided, resident attitudes about direct observation before and after implementation, and the response of the faculty.
RESULTS: Seventy-nine preceptors and 145 residents participated; 320 SCO forms were completed. Faculty provided feedback in 4 areas: content, process of the encounter, patient-centered attitudes and behaviors, and interpersonal skills. Feedback was 85% specific and 41% corrective. Corrective feedback was most frequent for physical examination skills. After program implementation, residents reported an increase in feedback and a decrease in discomfort with direct observation; in addition, they agreed that direct observation was a valuable component of their education. Participation rates among faculty were high.
CONCLUSIONS: Direct observation using SCOs results in timely and specific feedback to residents about behaviors rarely observed in traditional precepting models. Resident competency in these clinical skill domains is critical for assessing, diagnosing, and managing patients. The SCO methodology is a feasible way to provide formative feedback to residents about their clinical skills.
Copyright © 2011 Academic Pediatric Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21684232     DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2011.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Pediatr        ISSN: 1876-2859            Impact factor:   3.107


  7 in total

1.  A Pediatric Resident Curriculum for the Use of Health Literacy Communication Tools.

Authors:  Marguerite Costich; Gabriela Bisono; Nicole Meyers; Mariellen Lane; Dodi Meyer; Suzanne Friedman
Journal:  Health Lit Res Pract       Date:  2022-06-06

2.  Direct Versus Remote Clinical Observation: Assessing Learners' Milestones While Addressing Adolescent Patients' Needs.

Authors:  Sarah Pitts; Joshua Borus; Adrianne Goncalves; Holly Gooding
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-06

3.  A Comparison of Assessment Tools: Is Direct Observation an Improvement Over Objective Structured Clinical Examinations for Communications Skills Evaluation?

Authors:  Abraham M Goch; Raj Karia; David Taormina; Adina Kalet; Joseph Zuckerman; Kenneth A Egol; Donna Phillips
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-04

4.  Milestones-based direct observation tools in internal medicine resident continuity clinic.

Authors:  Jonathan P B Berz; Teresa Cheng; Lisa M Quintiliani
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Guidelines: The do's, don'ts and don't knows of direct observation of clinical skills in medical education.

Authors:  Jennifer R Kogan; Rose Hatala; Karen E Hauer; Eric Holmboe
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2017-10

6.  Narrative descriptions should replace grades and numerical ratings for clinical performance in medical education in the United States.

Authors:  Janice L Hanson; Adam A Rosenberg; J Lindsey Lane
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-21

Review 7.  Identifying educator behaviours for high quality verbal feedback in health professions education: literature review and expert refinement.

Authors:  Christina E Johnson; Jennifer L Keating; David J Boud; Megan Dalton; Debra Kiegaldie; Margaret Hay; Barry McGrath; Wendy A McKenzie; Kichu Balakrishnan R Nair; Debra Nestel; Claire Palermo; Elizabeth K Molloy
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.