Literature DB >> 21684044

[Bacterial identification methods in the microbiology laboratory].

Germán Bou1, Ana Fernández-Olmos, Celia García, Juan Antonio Sáez-Nieto, Sylvia Valdezate.   

Abstract

In order to identify the agent responsible of the infectious process and understanding the pathogenic/pathological implications, clinical course, and to implement an effective antimicrobial therapy, a mainstay in the practice of clinical microbiology is the allocation of species to a microbial isolation. In daily routine practice microbiology laboratory phenotypic techniques are applied to achieve this goal. However, they have some limitations that are seen more clearly for some kinds of microorganism. Molecular methods can circumvent some of these limitations, although its implementation is not universal. This is due to higher costs and the level of expertise required for thei implementation, so molecular methods are often centralized in reference laboratories and centers. Recently, proteomics-based methods made an important breakthrough in the field of diagnostic microbiology and will undoubtedly have a major impact on the future organization of the microbiology services. This paper is a short review of the most noteworthy aspects of the three bacterial identification methods described above used in microbiology laboratories.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier España, S.L. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21684044     DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2011.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin        ISSN: 0213-005X            Impact factor:   1.731


  4 in total

1.  Identification of Escherichia coli and Trueperella pyogenes isolated from the uterus of dairy cows using routine bacteriological testing and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  María Jaureguiberry; Laura Vanina Madoz; Mauricio Javier Giuliodori; Karen Wagener; Isabella Prunner; Tom Grunert; Monika Ehling-Schulz; Marc Drillich; Rodolfo Luzbel de la Sota
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 1.695

2.  Structural differences in gut bacteria communities in developmental stages of natural populations of Lutzomyia evansi from Colombia's Caribbean coast.

Authors:  Rafael José Vivero; Natalia Gil Jaramillo; Gloria Cadavid-Restrepo; Sandra I Uribe Soto; Claudia Ximena Moreno Herrera
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.876

3.  High clinical impact of rapid susceptibility testing on CHROMID ESBL® medium directly from swabs.

Authors:  Álvaro Romo-Ibáñez; Elisabeth Calatrava-Hernández; Blanca Gutiérrez-Soto; Mercedes Pérez-Ruiz; José María Navarro-Marí; José Gutiérrez-Fernández
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-05

4.  Performance of TDR-300B and VITEK®2 for the identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in comparison with VITEK®-MS.

Authors:  Lucky Hartati Moehario; Enty Tjoa; Hans Putranata; Shikha Joon; Daniel Edbert; Thomas Robertus
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.671

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.