Literature DB >> 21683861

Support surfaces for intraoperative prevention of pressure ulcers in patients undergoing surgery: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Ba' Pham1, Laura Teague, James Mahoney, Laurie Goodman, Mike Paulden, Jeff Poss, Jianli Li, Nancy Joan Sikich, Rosemarie Lourenco, Luciano Ieraci, Steven Carcone, Murray Krahn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients who undergo prolonged surgical procedures are at risk of developing pressure ulcers. Recent systematic reviews suggest that pressure redistribution overlays on operating tables significantly decrease the associated risk. Little is known about the cost effectiveness of using these overlays in a prevention program for surgical patients.
METHODS: Using a Markov cohort model, we evaluated the cost effectiveness of an intraoperative prevention strategy with operating table overlays made of dry, viscoelastic polymer from the perspective of a health care payer over a 1-year period. We simulated patients undergoing scheduled surgical procedures lasting ≥90 min in the supine or lithotomy position.
RESULTS: Compared with the current practice of using standard mattresses on operating tables, the intraoperative prevention strategy decreased the estimated intraoperative incidence of pressure ulcers by 0.51%, corresponding to a number-needed-to-treat of 196 patients. The average cost of using the operating table overlay was $1.66 per patient. Compared with current practice, this intraoperative prevention strategy would increase slightly the quality-adjusted life days of patients and by decreasing the incidence of pressure ulcers, this strategy would decrease both hospital and home care costs for treating fewer pressure ulcers originated intraoperatively. The cost savings was $46 per patient, which ranged from $13 to $116 by different surgical populations. Intraoperative prevention was 99% likely to be more cost effective than the current practice.
CONCLUSION: In patients who undergo scheduled surgical procedures lasting ≥90 min, this intraoperative prevention strategy could improve patients' health and save hospital costs. The clinical and economic evidence support the implementation of this prevention strategy in settings where it has yet to become current practice.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21683861     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  8 in total

1.  The cost-benefit of using soft silicone multilayered foam dressings to prevent sacral and heel pressure ulcers in trauma and critically ill patients: a within-trial analysis of the Border Trial.

Authors:  Nick Santamaria; Wei Liu; Marie Gerdtz; Sarah Sage; Jane McCann; Amy Freeman; Theresa Vassiliou; Stephanie DeVincentis; Ai W Ng; Elizabeth Manias; Jonathan Knott; Danny Liew
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Length of surgery and pressure ulcers risk in cardiovascular surgical patients: a dose-response meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hong-Lin Chen; Wang-Qin Shen; Peng Liu; Kun Liu
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Rhabdomyolysis after neurosurgery: a review and a framework for prevention.

Authors:  Claudio De Tommasi; Michael D Cusimano
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 4.  Health technologies for the improvement of chronic disease management: a review of the Medical Advisory Secretariat evidence-based analyses between 2006 and 2011.

Authors:  M Nikitovic; S Brener
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2013-09-01

5.  Evaluation of external pressure to the sacral region in the lithotomy position using the noninvasive pressure distribution measurement system.

Authors:  Ju Mizuno; Toru Takahashi
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Value of hospital resources for effective pressure injury prevention: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  William V Padula; Peter J Pronovost; Mary Beth F Makic; Heidi L Wald; Dane Moran; Manish K Mishra; David O Meltzer
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 7.035

7.  Use of an Alternating Inflatable Head Pad inPatients Undergoing Open Heart Surgery.

Authors:  Weijian Huang; Yongjian Zhu; Hua Qu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-02-16

8.  Comparison of Interface Pressures and Subjective Comfort of Pressure-Relieving Overlays on the Operating Table for Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Min Jung Han; Sangjin Ko
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.