Literature DB >> 21683563

Feasibility of case-based beam generation for robotic radiosurgery.

Alexander Schlaefer1, Sonja Dieterich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Robotic radiosurgery uses the kinematic flexibility of a robotic arm to target tumors and lesions from many different directions. This approach allows to focus the dose to the target region while sparing healthy surrounding tissue. However, the flexibility in the placement of treatment beams is also a challenge during treatment planning. We study an approach to make the search for treatment beams more efficient by considering previous treatment plans. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Conventionally, a beam generation heuristic based on randomly selected candidate beams has been proven to be most robust in clinical practice. However, for prevalent types of cancer similarities in patient anatomy and dose prescription exist. We present a case-based approach that introduces a problem specific measure of similarity and allows to generate candidate beams from a database of previous treatment plans. Similarity between treatments is established based on projections of the organs and structures considered during planning, and the desired dose distribution. Solving the inverse planning problem a subset of treatment beams is determined and adapted to the new clinical case.
RESULTS: Preliminary experimental results indicate that the new approach leads to comparable plan quality for substantially fewer candidate beams. For two prostate cases, the dose homogeneity in the target region and the sparing of critical structures is similar for plans based on 400 and 600 candidate beams generated with the novel and the conventional method, respectively. However, the runtime for solving the inverse planning problem for could be reduced by up to 47%, i.e., from approximately 19 min to less than 11 min.
CONCLUSION: We have shown the feasibility of case-based beam generation for robotic radiosurgery. For prevalent clinical cases with similar anatomy the cased-based approach could substantially reduce planning time while maintaining high plan quality.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21683563     DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2011.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Intell Med        ISSN: 0933-3657            Impact factor:   5.326


  5 in total

1.  Treatment Planning Considerations for Robotic Guided Cardiac Radiosurgery for Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Oliver Blanck; Svenja Ipsen; Mark K Chan; Ralf Bauer; Matthias Kerl; Peter Hunold; Volkmar Jacobi; Ralf Bruder; Achim Schweikard; Dirk Rades; Thomas J Vogl; Peter Kleine; Frank Bode; Jürgen Dunst
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-07-20

2.  Inverse treatment planning for spinal robotic radiosurgery: an international multi-institutional benchmark trial.

Authors:  Oliver Blanck; Lei Wang; Wolfgang Baus; Jimm Grimm; Thomas Lacornerie; Joakim Nilsson; Sergii Luchkovskyi; Isabel Palazon Cano; Zhenyu Shou; Myriam Ayadi; Harald Treuer; Romain Viard; Frank-Andre Siebert; Mark K H Chan; Guido Hildebrandt; Jürgen Dunst; Detlef Imhoff; Stefan Wurster; Robert Wolff; Pantaleo Romanelli; Eric Lartigau; Robert Semrau; Scott G Soltys; Achim Schweikard
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Methods for a similarity measure for clinical attributes based on survival data analysis.

Authors:  Christian Karmen; Matthias Gietzelt; Petra Knaup-Gregori; Matthias Ganzinger
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  AI-based optimization for US-guided radiation therapy of the prostate.

Authors:  Stefan Gerlach; Theresa Hofmann; Christoph Fürweger; Alexander Schlaefer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.421

5.  Similar-case-based optimization of beam arrangements in stereotactic body radiotherapy for assisting treatment planners.

Authors:  Taiki Magome; Hidetaka Arimura; Yoshiyuki Shioyama; Katsumasa Nakamura; Hiroshi Honda; Hideki Hirata
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-02       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.