| Literature DB >> 21682854 |
Tawhida Y Abdel Ghaffar1, Solaf M Elsayed, Suzan Elnaghy, Ahmed Shadeed, Ezzat S Elsobky, Hartmut Schmidt.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Egypt, Wilson disease seems to be under diagnosed and clinical data on large cohorts are limited. The aim of this study is to highlight the clinical, laboratory and genetic characteristics of this disease in our pediatric population as well as to report our experience with both treatment options and outcome.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21682854 PMCID: PMC3132721 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-11-56
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pediatr ISSN: 1471-2431 Impact factor: 2.125
Demographic data and type of presentation of the studied group
| 1-18 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9.92 ± 0.37 | ||
| 10 ± 4 | ||
| 1.0 -19 | ||
| 10.96 ± 0.45 | ||
| 10 ± 4 | ||
| 43/34 | ||
| 56/71 (78.9%) | ||
| 50 | ||
| 25 (34.2%) | ||
| 30 (41.1%) | ||
| 12 (16.4%) | ||
| 6 (8.2%) | ||
| 35 (45.5%) | ||
| 6 (7.8%) | ||
| 9 (11.7%) | ||
| 27 (35.1%) | ||
N.B. Two adult patients with ages of 30 and 37 years (cousins of one of the children) were excluded when calculating the age ranges and mean.
M: male, F: female, SD: standard deviation, IR: interquartial range
Criteria used in diagnosis of WD in the studied group
| % | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 74 | |||
| 19.5 | |||
| 6.5 | |||
| 77.8 | |||
| 69.2 | |||
| 84.2 | |||
| 38.5 | |||
| 5.4 | |||
Comparison between different studied groups as regards clinical and laboratory data
| G1 (35) | G2 (6) | G3 (9) | G4 (27) | Total (77) | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20/15 | 4/2 | 7/2 | 12/15 | 43/34 | 0.32 | ||
| 10 (6-15) | 12 (10-14) | 11 (9-18) | 8 (1-17) | 10 (1-18) | 0.017 | ||
| 0.83 ± 3 | 4.75 ± 0.9 | 1.9 ± 0.6 | - | 1.03 ± 0.2 | 0.000* | ||
| 60.27 (0.25-156) | 32.5 (12-48) | 75.86 (12-156) | 89.55 (5-156) | 58.9 (0.25-156) | |||
| 25 (71.4) | 6 (100) | 7 (77.8) | 19 (70.4) | 57 (74) | |||
| 6 (17.1) | 0 (0) | 2 (22.2) | 7 (25.9) | 15 (19.5) | |||
| 4 (11.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.7) | 5 (6.5) | |||
| 22 (62.9) | 2 (33.3) | 5 (55.6) | 22 (81.5) | 51 (66.2) | 0.134 | ||
| 22 (62.9) | 1 (16.6) | 6 (66.6) | 9 (33.3) | 38 (49.4) | 0.006 | ||
| 24 (68.6) | 0 (0) | 2 (22.2) | 0 (0) | 26 (33.8) | 0.000* | ||
| 17 (48.6) | 0 (0) | 4 (44.4) | 0 (0) | 21 (27.3) | 0.000* | ||
| 15(42.9) | 0 (0) | 5(55.6) | 0 (0) | 20 (26) | 0.000* | ||
| 2 (5.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (2.6) | |||
| 2.8 ± 0.4 | 1.7 ± 0.8 | 1.7 ± 0.3 | 3.2 ± 0.5 | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 0.056 | ||
| 3.9 ± 0.5 | 1.0 | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 2.4 ± 0.3 | 3.2 ± 0.3 | 0.001* | ||
| 8.0 ± 1.7 | 2.5 ± 1.6 | 1.8 ± 0.5 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 4.2 ± 0.8 | 0.000* | ||
| 3.0 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 3.8 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.04 | 2.3 ± 3.4 | 0.000* | ||
| 2.6 ± 0.1 | 4.3 ± 0.1 | 3.0 ± 0.3 | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 3.2 ± 1.2 | 0.000* | ||
| 4/11 (36.4) | 1/4 (25) | 0/4 (0) | 7/20 (35) | 12/39 (30.8) | |||
| 7/11 (63.6) | 1/4 (25) | 4/4 (100) | 9/20 (45) | 21/39 (53.8) | |||
| 3/11 (27.3) | 1/4 (25) | 2/4 (50) | 2/20 (10) | 8/39 (20.5) | |||
| 2/11 (18.2) | 1/4 (25) | 0/4 (0) | 7 (35) | 10/39 (25.6) | |||
| 4/11 (36.4) | 0/4 (0) | 1/4 (25) | 5 (25) | 10/39 (25.6) | |||
| 1/11 (9) | 1/4 (25) | 0/4 (0) | 2 (10) | 4/39 (10.3) | |||
| 27/28 (96.4) | 6/6 (100) | 8/8 (100) | 4/23 (17.4) | 45/65 (69.2) | 0.000 | ||
Comparison between different types with hepatic involvement (G1 and G3)
| Chronic LD | Acute hepatitis | ALF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25/44 (56.8) | 6/44 (13.6) | 13/44 (29.5) | ||
| 13/12 | 3/3 | 11/2 | 0.178 | |
| 6-15 | 9-15 | 6-13 | ||
| 10.7 ± 2.8 | 11.57 ± 2.15 | 9.33 ± 2.01 | 1.49 | |
| 10.5 ± 4 | 11 ± 4 | 9 ± 3 | ||
| 19/20 (95%) | 6/6 (100) | 10/10 (100) | 0.276 | |
SD: standard deviation, IR: interquartial range, KF: Kayser-Fleisher
Homozygous mutations detected in children with Wilson disease in this study
| Mutation | Type of mutation | No. of patients | No. of chromosomes | Form of WD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deletion/frameshift | 1 | 2 | H (CLD) | |
| Nonsense | 3 | 6 | 2 C (CLD) | |
| N | ||||
| deletion/frameshift | 2 | 4 | C (CLD) | |
| Missense | 1 | 2 | C (CLD) | |
| Splice | 2 | 4 | 2 C (CLD) | |
| Missense | 1 | 2 | H (CLD) | |
| Missense | 2 | 4 | H (CLD) | |
| H (ALF) | ||||
| insertion/frameshift | 1 | 2 | A | |
| Missense | 1 | 2 | H (CLD) | |
| deletion/frameshift | 2 | 4 | H (CLD) | |
| Missense | 1 | 2 | Combined | |
| Missense | 2 | 4 | H (CLD) | |
| insertion/frameshift | 1 | 2 | H (ALF) | |
| Missense | 3 | 6 | H (CLD) | |
| deletion-insertion/frameshift | 4 | 8 | H (CLD) | |
| Missense | 1 | 2 | A | |
| Splice | 4 | 8 | H (ALF) | |
| C (CLD) | ||||
| H (CLD) | ||||
| C (CLD) | ||||
| Missense | 2 | 4 | C (CLD | |
| Missense | 3 | 6 | H (CLD) | |
| deletion/frameshift | 1 | 2 | H (ALF) | |
| Missense | C (CLD) | |||
| Nonsense | 3 | 6 | H (ALF) H (CLD) | |
| Missense | 2 | 4 | H (CLD) | |
| Missense | 1 | 2 | H (CLD) | |
| Missense | 1 | 2 | C (CLD) | |
| Nonsense | 1 | 2 | H (CLD) | |
| Missense | 1 | 2 | C (CLD) | |
| Missense | 1 | 2 | N | |
| H (CLD) | ||||
| deletion-insertion/frameshift | 1 | 2 | H (ALF) | |
| Missense | 2 | 4 | H (CLD) | |
| deletion/frameshift | 1 | 2 | C (CLD) | |
| Splice | 1 | 2 | C (CLD) | |
| Missense | 1 | 2 | H (CLD) |
1Suspected disease causing variants
(*): novel mutations detected in this study
*genbank sequences (NM_000053.2)
A: asymptomatic, H: hepatic, N, neurological, C: combined, AH: acute hepatitis, CLD: chronic liver disease. ALF: acute liver failure
Figure 1Scatter chart showing that non compliance increased with increasing age.
Figure 2Kaplan Meier curve showing a significant effect of compliance on survival (Blue line: non-compliance < 50% of follow up time. Red line: non-compliance ≥ 50% of follow up time).
Outcome of the studied patients
| G1 (27) | G2 (4) | G3 (8) | G4 (22) | Total (61) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 11 (18%) | |
| 11 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 30 (49.2%) | |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 (6.5%) | |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 (9.8%) | |
| 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 10 (16.4%) | |
Figure 3Kaplan Meier curve showing a significant effect of Dhawan et al [8]prognostic score on survival (red line: prognostic score ≥11. blue line: prognostic score <11)